skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3026040acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opportunities and Design Considerations for Peer Support in a Hospital Setting

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although research has demonstrated improved outcomes for outpatients who receive peer support-such as through online health communities, support groups, and mentoring systems-hospitalized patients have few mechanisms to receive such valuable support. To explore the opportunities for a hospital-based peer support system, we administered a survey to 146 pediatric patients and caregivers, and conducted semi-structured interviews with twelve patients and three caregivers in a children's hospital. Our analysis revealed that hospitalized individuals need peer support for five key purposes: (1) to ask about medical details-such as procedures, treatments, and medications; (2) to learn about healthcare providers; (3) to report and prevent medical errors; (4) to exchange emotional support; and (5) to manage their time in the hospital. In this paper, we examine these themes and describe potential barriers to using a hospital-based peer support system. We then discuss the unique opportunities and challenges that the hospital environment presents when designing for peer support in this setting.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p867-haldar.mp4

mp4

164.8 MB

References

  1. Marina Bers, Clement Chau, Keiko Satoh, and Laura Beals. 2007. Virtual Communities of Care: Online Peer Networks with Post-Organ Transplant Youth. International Society of the Learning Sciences. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Marina U. Bers, Joseph Gonzalez-Heydrich, and David Ray DeMaso. 2001. Identity construction environments: supporting a virtual therapeutic community of pediatric patients undergoing dialysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '01, 380--387. http://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365302 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sharon H. Campbell, Marie Rose Phaneuf, and Karen Deane. 2004. Cancer peer support programs "do they work" Patient Education and Counseling 55, 1: 3--15. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.10.001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Yu Chen, Mirana E. Randriambelonoro, Antoine Geissbuhler, and Pearl Pu. 2016. Social Incentives in Pervasive Fitness Apps for Obese and Diabetic patients. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion - CSCW '16 Companion, 245--248. http://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2869093 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jui-Chih Chin and Mengping Tsuei. 2009. Multiuser Narrative Sharing System for Children with Chronic Illness. In 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 479--481. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2009.154 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Andrea Civan, David W. McDonald, Kenton T. Unruh, and Wanda Pratt. 2009. Locating patient expertise in everyday life. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work - GROUP '09: 291--300. http://doi.org/10.1145/1531674.1531718 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Andrea Civan and Wanda Pratt. 2007. Threading together patient expertise. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium: 140--144. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Threading- Together-Patient-Expertise-Hartzler-Pratt/64eed14b34218d8626d5411c0af9e8bd4630179c/pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R J Cline and K M Haynes. 2001. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Education Research 16, 6: 671--92. http://doi.org/10.1093/HER/16.6.671 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. R. Dale, S. M. Williams, and V. Bowyer. 2012. What is the effect of peer support on diabetes outcomes in adults? A systematic review. Diabetic Medicine 29, 11: 1361--1377. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464--5491.2012.03749.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Honglu Du, Michael G. Youngblood, and Peter Pirolli. 2014. Efficacy of a Smartphone System to Support Groups in Behavior Change Programs. In Proceedings of the Wireless Health 2014 on National Institutes of Health - WH '14, 1--8. http://doi.org/10.1145/2668883.2668887 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jordan Eschler, Zakariya Dehlawi, and Wanda Pratt. 2015. Self-Characterized Illness Phase and Information Needs of Participants in an Online Cancer Forum. Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media: 101--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Susannah Fox and Sydney Jones. 2009. The social life of health information. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project: 2009--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Victoria Louise Franklin, Alexandra Greene, Annalu Waller, Stephen Alan Greene, and Claudia Pagliari. 2008. Patients' Engagement with "Sweet Talk" - A Text Messaging Support System for Young People with Diabetes. Journal of Medical Internet Research 10, 2: e20. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.962Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jeana H Frost and Michael P Massagli. 2008. Social Uses of Personal Health Information Within PatientsLikeMe, an Online Patient Community: What Can Happen When Patients Have Access to One Another's Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 10, 3. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1053 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jeremy A. Greene, Niteesh K. Choudhry, Elaine Kilabuk, and William H. Shrank. 2011. Online Social Networking by Patients with Diabetes: A Qualitative Evaluation of Communication with Facebook. Journal of General Internal Medicine 26, 3: 287--292. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010--1526--3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Shefali Haldar, Alex Filipkowski, Sonali R Mishra, et al. 2016. "Scared to go to the Hospital": Inpatient Experiences with Undesirable Events. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium 2016: 609--617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Andrea L. Hartzler, Megan N. Taylor, Albert Park, et al. 2016. Leveraging cues from person-generated health data for peer matching in online communities. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 23, 3: 496--507. http://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv175 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Andrea L Hartzler, David W Mcdonald, Albert Park, Jina Huh, Charles Weaver, and Wanda Pratt. 2014. Evaluating Health Interest Profiles Extracted from Patient-Generated Data. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium 2014: 626--635.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Andrea Hartzler and Wanda Pratt. 2011. Managing the Personal Side of Health: How Patient Expertise Differs from the Expertise of Clinicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13, 3: e62. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1728Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Michele Heisler, Sandeep Vijan, Fatima Makki, and John D. Piette. 2010. Diabetes Control With Reciprocal Peer Support Versus Nurse Care Management: A Randomized Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 153, 8: 507--515. http://doi.org/10.7326/0003--4819--153--8- 201010190-00007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mette Terp Høybye, Christoffer Johansen, and Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen. 2005. Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an internet breast cancer support group. Psycho-Oncology 14, 3: 211--220. http://doi.org/10.1002/pon.837 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jina Huh and Mark S. Ackerman. 2012. Collaborative help in chronic disease management. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '12: 853. http://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145331 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jina Huh, Leslie S Liu, Tina Neogi, Kori Inkpen, and Wanda Pratt. 2014. Health Vlogs as Social Support for Chronic Illness Management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 21, 4: 23. http://doi.org/10.1145/2630067Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Maia Jacobs, James Clawson, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2014. Cancer Navigation: Opportunities and Challenges for Facilitating the Breast Cancer Journey. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '14: 1467--1478. http://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531645Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Elizabeth Kaziunas, Ayse G Buyuktur, Jasmine Jones, et al. 2015. Transition and Reflection in the Use of Health Information : The Case of Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Caregivers. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15: 1763--1774.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Logan Kendall, Sonali R Mishra, Ari Pollack, Barry Aaronson, and Wanda Pratt. 2015. Making background work visible: opportunities to address patient information needs in the hospital. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium 2015: 1957--66. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26958295Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sharon Lawn, Ann Smith, and Kelly Hunter. 2008. Mental health peer support for hospital avoidance and early discharge: An Australian example of consumer driven and operated service. Journal of Mental Health 17, 5: 498--508. http://doi.org/10.1080/09638230701530242 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Victor Li, David W. McDonald, Elizabeth V. Eikey, et al. 2014. Losing It Online: CharacterizingParticipation in an Online Weight Loss Community. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work - GROUP '14, 35--45. http://doi.org/10.1145/2660398.2660416Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Leslie S Liu, Jina Huh, Tina Neogi, Kori Inkpen, and Wanda Pratt. 2013. Health Vlogger-Viewer Interaction in Chronic Illness Management. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13: 49--58. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470663Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Leslie S Liu, Kori M. Inkpen, and Wanda Pratt. 2015. "I'm Not Like My Friends": Understanding How Children with a Chronic Illness Use Technology to Maintain Normalcy. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15: 1527--1539. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kate Lorig, Philip L. Ritter, Diana D. Laurent, et al. 2010. Online Diabetes Self-Management Program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care 33, 6: 1275--1281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Julie Maitland and Matthew Chalmers. 2011. Designing for peer involvement in weight management. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '11: 315--324. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978988 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Martin A Makary and Michael Daniel. 2016. Medical error the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 353: i2139. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2139 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Danielle M. McCarthy, Emily P. Ellison, Arjun K. Venkatesh, et al. 2013. Emergency department team communication with the patient: The patient's perspective. Journal of Emergency Medicine 45, 2: 262--270. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.052 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Andrew D Miller, Sonali R Mishra, Logan Kendall, Shefali Haldar, Ari H Pollack, and Wanda Pratt. 2016. Partners in Care: Design Considerations for Caregivers and Patients During a Hospital Stay. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion - CSCW '16. http://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819983Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Andrew D Miller, Ari H Pollack, Wanda Pratt, and Seattle Children. 2016. Bursting the Information Bubble : Identifying Opportunities for Pediatric Patient-Centered Technology. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium: 894--903.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sonali R Mishra, Shefali Haldar, Ari H Pollack, et al. 2016. "Not Just a Receiver": Understanding Patient Behavior in the Hospital Environment. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16: 3103--3114. http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858167Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. S Anne Moorhead, Diane E Hazlett, Laura Harrison, Jennifer K Carroll, Anthea Irwin, and Ciska Hoving. 2013. A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, 4. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1933Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Dan Morris and Amy Karlson. 2011. Dynamic Accessibility Requirements for Hospital Patients. Human Factors: 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Mark W. Newman, Debra Lauterbach, Sean A. Munson, Paul Resnick, and Margaret E. Morris. 2011. It's not that i don't have problems, i'm just not putting them on facebook. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '11: 341. http://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958876 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Ari H Pollack, Uba Backonja, Andrew D Miller, et al. 2016. Closing the Gap: Supporting Patients' Transition to Self-Management after Hospitalization. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16: 5324--5336. http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858240Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Jenny Preece. 1998. Empathic communities: reaching out across the Web. Interactions 5, 2: 32--43. http://doi.org/10.1145/274430.274435 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus, Mark Tomlinson, Margaret Gwegwe, W Scott Comulada, Neal Kaufman, and Marion Keim. 2012. Diabetes buddies: peer support through a mobile phone buddy system. The Diabetes educator 38, 3: 357--65. http://doi.org/10.1177/014572171244461744. J. Sarasohn-Kahn and California Healthcare Foundation. 2008. The Wisdom of Patients: Health Care Meets Online Social Media. California HealthCare Foundation, April. Retrieved from http://www.chcf.org/publications/2008/04/thewisdom-of-patients-health-care-meets-onlinesocial-mediaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. William H. Sledge, Martha Lawless, David Sells, Melissa Wieland, Maria J. O'Connell, and Larry Davidson. 2011. Effectiveness of Peer Support in Reducing Readmissions of Persons With Multiple Psychiatric Hospitalizations. Psychiatric Services 62, 5: 541--544. http://doi.org/10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0541 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Juliet M. Strauss, Anselm L.; Corbin. 1998. Basicsof Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. M W Verheijden, J C Bakx, C van Weel, M A Koelen, and W A van Staveren. 2005. Role of social support in lifestyle-focused weight management interventions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 59: S179--S186. http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602194 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Marianne Webb, Jane Burns, and Philippa Collin. 2008. Providing online support for young people with mental health difficulties: challenges and opportunities explored. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 2, 2: 108--113. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751--7893.2008.00066.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Mary Webster, Emma Foster, Rob Comber, Simon Bowen, Tim Cheetham, and Madeline Balaam. 2015. Understanding the lived experience of adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC '15: 140--149. http://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771854 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. M White and S M Dorman. 2001. Receiving social support online: implications for health education. Health Education Research 16, 6: 693--707. http://doi.org/10.1093/HER/16.6.693 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Andrew J. Winzelberg, Catherine Classen, Georg W. Alpers, et al. 2003. Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer 97, 5: 1164--1173. http://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11174 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. 2014. Fast Facts on US Hospitals. Retrieved from http://www.aha.org/research/rc/stat-studies/fastfacts.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Opportunities and Design Considerations for Peer Support in a Hospital Setting

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader