skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3026045acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Understanding Volunteer AT Fabricators: Opportunities and Challenges in DIY-AT for Others in e-NABLE

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the results of a study of e-NABLE, a distributed, collaborative volunteer effort to design and fabricate upper-limb assistive technology devices for limb-different users. Informed by interviews with 14 stakeholders in e-NABLE, including volunteers and clinicians, we discuss differences and synergies among each group with respect to motivations, skills, and perceptions of risks inherent in the project. We found that both groups are motivated to be involved in e-NABLE by the ability to use their skills to help others, and that their skill sets are complementary, but that their different perceptions of risk may result in uneven outcomes or missed expectations for end users. We offer four opportunities for design and technology to enhance the stakeholders' abilities to work together.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn4891p.mp4

mp4

947.1 KB

References

  1. Chris Anderson. 2014. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Crown Business.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cynthia L Bennett, Keting Cen, Katherine M Steele, and Daniela K Rosner. 2016. An Intimate Laboratory?: Prostheses as a Tool for Experimenting with Identity and Normalcy. In CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1745--1756. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 1999. Contextual Design. interactions 6, 1 (Jan. 1999), 32--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Elaine A Biddiss and Tom T Chau. 2007. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthetics and orthotics international 31, 3 (2007), 236--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Leah Buechley and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2012. Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 19, 3 (Oct. 2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Erin Buehler, Stacy Branham, Abdullah Ali, Jeremy J Chang, Megan Kelly Hofmann, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Sharing is Caring: Assistive Technology Designs on Thingiverse. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 525--534. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Erin Buehler, Shaun K. Kane, and Amy Hurst. 2014. ABC and 3D: Opportunities and Obstacles to 3D Printing in Special Education Environments. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Matthew B Burn, Anderson Ta, and Gloria R Gogola. 2016. Three-Dimensional Printing of Prosthetic Hands for Children. The Journal of hand surgery 41, 5 (2016), e103--e109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2014. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jayne Cravens. 2000. Virtual Volunteering: Online Volunteers Providing Assistance to Human Service Agencies. Journal of Technology in Human Services 17, 2--3 (Oct. 2000), 119--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Laura Dabbish, Colleen Stuart, Jason Tsay, and Jim Herbsleb. 2012. Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 1277--1286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J L Davidson, U A Mannan, R Naik, and I Dua. 2014. Older Adults and Free/Open Source Software: A Diary Study of First-Time Contributors. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Open Collaboration. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lieven De Couvreur, Walter Dejonghe, Jan Detand, and Richard Goossens. 2013. The Role of Subjective Well-Being in Co-Designing Open-Design Assistive Devices. 7, 3 (2013), 57--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Erving Goffman. 1963. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. (1963).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Megan Hofmann, Julie Burke, Jon Pearlman, Goeran Fiedler, Andrea Hess, Jon Schull, Scott Hudson, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2016. Clinical and Maker Perspectives on the Design of Assistive Technology with Rapid Prototyping Technologies. In ASSETS '16: Proceedings of the 18th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility. 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jonathan Hook, Sanne Verbaan, Abigail Durrant, Patrick Olivier, and Peter Wright. 2014. A study of the challenges related to DIY assistive technology in the context of children with disabilities. In DIS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. NY, NY, USA, 597--606. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nathaniel Hudson, Celena Alcock, and Parmit K. Chilana. 2016. Understanding Newcomers to 3D Printing: Motivations, Workflows, and Barriers of Casual Makers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 384--396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Amy Hurst and Shaun K. Kane. 2013. Making "making" accessible. In IDC '13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Amy Hurst and Jasmine Tobias. 2011. Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. ACM, 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sofia Hussain, Elizabeth B N Sanders, and Martin Steinert. 2012. Participatory Design with Marginalized People in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities Experienced in a Field Study in Cambodia. International Journal of Design 6, 2 (2012), 91--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lesley Hustinx and Frans Lammertyn. 2003. Collective and Reflexive Styles of Volunteering: A Sociological Modernization Perspective. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 14, 2 (2003), 167--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Aniket Kittur and Robert E Kraut. 2008. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press, NY, NY, USA, 37--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Stacey Kuznetsov and Eric Paulos. 2010. Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures. In NordiCHI '10: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Silvia Lindtner, Garnet D Hertz, and Paul Dourish. 2014. Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators. In CHI'14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Audris Mockus, Roy T Fielding, and James D Herbsleb. 2002. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 11, 3 (2002), 309--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Seyed Mehdi Nasehi, Jonathan Sillito, Frank Maurer, and Chris Burns. 2012. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE, NY, NY, USA, 25--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Betsy Phillips and Hongxin Zhao. 2010. Predictors of Assistive Technology Abandonment. Assistive Technology 5, 1 (Oct. 2010), 36--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. K Postema, V Van der Donk, J Van Limbeek, R AJ Rijken, and MJ Poelma. 1999. Prosthesis rejection in children with a unilateral congenital arm defect. Clinical rehabilitation 13, 3 (1999), 243--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Daniela Rosner and Jonathan Bean. 2009. Learning from IKEA Hacking: "I'm Not One to Decoupage a Tabletop and Call It a Day." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 419--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Daniela K. Rosner and Morgan Ames. 2014. Designing for Repair?: Infrastructures and Materialities of Breakdown. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 319--331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sonali K Shah. 2006. Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development. Management science 52, 7 (July 2006), 1000--1014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. In the Shadow of Misperception: Assistive Technology Use and Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 705--714. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Joshua G Tanenbaum, Amanda M Williams, Audrey Desjardins, and Karen Tanenbaum. 2013. Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Amy Voida, Zheng Yao, and Matthias Korn. 2015. (Infra)structures of Volunteering. In 18th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Work. 1704--1716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jing Wang, Patrick C Shih, and John M Carroll. 2015. Revisiting Linus's Law: Benefits and challenges of open source software peer review. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 77, May 2015 (May 2015), 52--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yunwen Ye and K Kishida. 2003. Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers. In Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 25th International Conference on. IEEE, 419--429. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Volunteer AT Fabricators: Opportunities and Challenges in DIY-AT for Others in e-NABLE

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2017
        7138 pages
        ISBN:9781450346559
        DOI:10.1145/3025453

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader