Exploring bimanual camera control and object manipulation in 3D graphics interfaces

ABSTRACT

We explore the use of the non-dominant hand to control a virtual camera while the dominant hand performs other tasks in a virtual 3D scene. Two experiments and an informal study are presented which evaluate this interaction style by comparing it to the status-quo unimanual interaction. In the first experiment, we find that for a target selection task, performance using the bimanual technique was 20% faster. Experiment 2 compared performance in a more complicated object docking task. Performance advantages are shown, however, only after practice. Free-form 3D painting was explored in the user study. In both experiments and in the user study participants strongly preferred the bimanual technique. The results also indicate that user preferences concerning bimanual interaction may be driven by factors other than simple time-motion performance advantages.

REFERENCES

• 1: Ravin Balakrishnan , Thomas Baudel , Gordon Kurtenbach , George Fitzmaurice, The Rockin'Mouse: integral 3D manipulation on a plane, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.311-318, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258778]
• 2: Eric A. Bier , Maureen C. Stone , Ken Pier , William Buxton , Tony D. DeRose, Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.73-80, September 1993 [doi>10.1145/166117.166126]
• 3: Braunstein, M.L. (1976). Depth perception through motion. Academic Press.
• 4: W. Buxton , B. Myers, A study in two-handed input, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.321-326, April 13-17, 1986, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 5: Lawrence D. Cutler , Bernd Fröhlich , Pat Hanrahan, Two-handed direct manipulation on the responsive workbench, Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.107-114, April 27-30, 1997, Providence, Rhode Island, United States [doi>10.1145/253284.253315]
• 6: Cutting, J.E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion, MIT Press.
• 7: Guiard, Y. (1987). Asymmetric division of labour in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a model. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 19, 486-517.
• 8: Haber, R.N., & Hershenson, M. (1973). The psychology of visual perception. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
• 9: Ken Hinckley , Randy Pausch , John C. Goble , Neal F. Kassell, Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.452-458, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/191666.191821]
• 10: Ken Hinckley , Randy Pausch , Dennis Proffitt , James Patten , Neal Kassell, Cooperative bimanual action, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.27-34, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258571]
• 11: Ken Hinckley , Randy Pausch , Dennis Proffitt, Attention and visual feedback: the bimanual frame of reference, Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.121-ff., April 27-30, 1997, Providence, Rhode Island, United States [doi>10.1145/253284.253318]
• 12: johnsgard, T. (1994). Fitts' Law with a virtual reality glove and a mouse: Effects of gain. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 1994, 8-15, Canadian Information Processing Society.
• 13: Paul Kabbash , William Buxton , Abigail Sellen, Two-handed input in a compound task, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.417-423, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/191666.191808]
• 14: Kirsh, D. & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513-549.
• 15: Gordon Kurtenbach , George Fitzmaurice , Thomas Baudel , Bill Buxton, The design of a GUI paradigm based on tablets, two-hands, and transparency, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.35-42, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258574]
• 16: Andrea Leganchuk , Shumin Zhai , William Buxton, Manual and cognitive benefits of two-handed input: an experimental study, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.5 n.4, p.326-359, Dec. 1998 [doi>10.1145/300520.300522]
• 17: Multigen Inc., SmartScene. http://www.multigen.com/
• 18: Poulton, E.C. (1989). Bias in quantifying judgements. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• 19: Emanuel Sachs , Andrew Roberts , David Stoops, 3-Draw: A Tool for Designing 3D Shapes, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.11 n.6, p.18-26, November 1991 [doi>10.1109/38.103389 ]
• 20: Colin Ware , Kathy Lowther, Selection using a one-eyed cursor in a fish tank VR environment, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.4 n.4, p.309-322, Dec. 1997 [doi>10.1145/267135.267136]
• 21: Wickens, C.D., Todd, S., & Seidler, K. (1989). Three dimensional displays: Perception, implementation, and applications. CSERIAC Rep: CSERIAC-SOAR-89-O01. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
• 22: Wickens, C.D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. Harper Collins.
• 23: Robert C. Zeleznik , Andrew S. Forsberg , Paul S. Strauss, Two pointer input for 3D interaction, Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.115-ff., April 27-30, 1997, Providence, Rhode Island, United States [doi>10.1145/253284.253316]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: User interface management systems (UIMS)

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

General Terms:
Experimentation, Management

Keywords:
3D interfaces, bimanual input, camera control, empirical evaluation, interaction techniques