ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Inferring intent in eye-based interfaces: tracing eye movements with process models
Full text PdfPdf (1.05 MB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 254 - 261  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:0-201-48559-1
Author
Dario D. Salvucci  Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 62,   Citation Count: 28
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/302979.303055
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While current eye-based interfaces offer enormous potential for efficient human-computer interaction, they also manifest the difficulty of inferring intent from user eye movements. This paper describes how fixation tracing facilitates the interpretation of eye movements and improves the flexibility and usability of eye-based interfaces. Fixation tracing uses hidden Markov models to map user actions to the sequential predictions of a cognitive process model. In a study of eye typing, results show that fixation tracing generates significantly more accurate interpretations than simpler methods and allows for more flexibility in designing usable interfaces. Implications for future research in eye-based interfaces and multimodal interfaces are discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
 
3
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
4
 
5
Frey, L. A., White, K. P., & Hutchinson, T. E. (1990). Eye-gaze word processing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20, 944-950.
 
6
Goldberg, J. H., & Schryver, J. C. (1995). Eye-gaze determination of user intent at the computer interface. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye Movement Research." Mechanisms, Processes, and Applications (pp. 491-502). New York: Elsevier Science Publishing.
 
7
Hutchinson, T. E., White, K. P., Martin, W. N., Reichert, K. C., & Frey, L. A. (1989). Humancomputer interaction using eye-gaze input. 1EEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19, 1527-1534.
 
8
 
9
Lohse, G. L., & Johnson, E. J. (1996). A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 28-43.
 
10
Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77, 257-286.
 
11
Salvucci, D. D., & Anderson, J. R. (1998). Tracing eye movement protocols with cognitive process models. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 923-928). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
12
Stampe, D. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1995). Selection by looking: A novel computer interface and its application to psychological research. In J. M. Fiiadlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes, and Applications (pp. 467- 478). New York: Elsevier Science Publishing.
 
13

CITED BY  28
 
 


Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: