skip to main content
10.1145/3041021.3051153acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Extracting Implicit Social Relation for Social Recommendation Techniques in User Rating Prediction

Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommendation plays an increasingly important role in our daily lives. Recommender systems automatically suggest items to users that might be interesting for them. Recent studies illustrate that incorporating social trust in Matrix Factorization methods demonstrably improves accuracy of rating prediction. Such approaches mainly use the trust scores explicitly expressed by users. However, it is often challenging to have users provide explicit trust scores of each other. There exist quite a few works, which propose Trust Metrics to compute and predict trust scores between users based on their interactions. In this paper, first we present how social relation can be extracted from users' ratings to items by describing Hellinger distance between users in recommender systems. Then, we propose to incorporate the predicted trust scores into social matrix factorization models. By analyzing social relation extraction from three well-known real-world datasets, which both: trust and recommendation data available, we conclude that using the implicit social relation in social recommendation techniques has almost the same performance compared to the actual trust scores explicitly expressed by users. Hence, we build our method, called Hell-TrustSVD, on top of the state-of-the-art social recommendation technique to incorporate both the extracted implicit social relations and ratings given by users on the prediction of items for an active user. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to extend TrustSVD with extracted social trust information. The experimental results support the idea of employing implicit trust into matrix factorization whenever explicit trust is not available, can perform much better than the state-of-the-art approaches in user rating prediction.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Context-aware recommender systems. Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 217--253, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. I. Csiszár and P. C. Shields. Information Theory and Statistics: A Tutorial, volume 1. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Davoudi and M. Chatterjee. Modeling trust for rating prediction in recommender systems. In SIAM Workshop on Machine Learning Methods for Recommender Systems, SIAM, pages 1--8, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. Fang, Y. Bao, and J. Zhang. Leveraging decomposed trust in probabilistic matrix factorization for effective recommendation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 30--36. AAAI Press, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Fazeli, B. Loni, A. Bellogin, H. Drachsler, P. Sloep, and B. L. Soude Fazeli Alejandro Bellogín, Hendrik Drachsler, Peter B. Sloep. Implicit vs. explicit trust in social matrix factorization. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems - RecSys '14, pages 14--17, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Forsati, M. Mahdavi, M. Shamsfard, and M. Sarwat. Matrix factorization with explicit trust and distrust side information for improved social recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 32(4):17, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Guo, J. Zhang, and D. Thalmann. A simple but effective method to incorporate trusted neighbors in recommender systems. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), volume 7379 LNCS, pages 114--125, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. Guo, J. Zhang, D. Thalmann, and N. Yorke-Smith. Etaf: An extended trust antecedents framework for trust prediction. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pages 540--547, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. G. Guo, J. Zhang, and N. Yorke-Smith. A novel bayesian similarity measure for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 2619--2625, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Guo, J. Zhang, and N. Yorke-Smith. Leveraging multiviews of trust and similarity to enhance clustering-based recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 74:14--27, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Guo, J. Zhang, and N. Yorke-smith. TrustSVD: Collaborative Filtering with Both the Explicit and Implicit Influence of User Trust and of Item Ratings. AAAI 2015: Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 123--129, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Guo, J. Zhang, and N. Yorke-Smith. A novel recommendation model regularized with user trust and item ratings. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 28(7):1607--1620, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. Guo, J. Ma, H.-R. Jiang, Z.-M. Chen, and C.-M. Xing. Social trust aware item recommendation for implicit feedback. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 30(5):1039--1053, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. H Alizadeh and L. Sheugh. Merging similarity and trust based social networks to enhance the accuracy of trust-aware recommender systems. Journal of Computer & Robotics, 8(2):43--51, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. F. M. Harper and J. A. Konstan. The movielens datasets: History and context. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 5(4):19, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. W. Harris and H. Stöcker. Handbook of mathematics and computational science. Springer Science & Business Media, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G.-N. Hu, X.-Y. Dai, Y. Song, S.-J. Huang, and J.-J. Chen. A synthetic approach for recommendation: combining ratings, social relations, and reviews. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.02327, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L.-w. Huang, G.-s. Chen, Y.-c. Liu, and D.-y. Li. Enhancing recommender systems by incorporating social information. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C, 14(9):711--721, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. K. Hunter. An Introduction to Real Analysis, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. F. Isinkaye, Y. Folajimi, and B. Ojokoh. Recommendation systems: Principles, methods and evaluation. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 16(3):261--273, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Jamali and M. Ester. A matrix factorization technique with trust propagation for recommendation in social networks. Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems - RecSys '10, pages 135--142, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Kabbur and G. Karypis. FISM : Factored Item Similarity Models for Top-N Recommender Systems. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 659--667, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood. In Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD 08, page 426, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Y. Koren. Factor in the neighbors: Scalable and accurate collaborative filtering. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 4(1):1, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Y. Koren, R. Bell, C. Volinsky, et al. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. F. Liu and H. J. Lee. Use of social network information to enhance collaborative filtering performance. Expert systems with applications, 37(7):4772--4778, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Y. Liu, P. Zhao, X. Liu, M. Wu, and X.-L. Li. Learning Optimal Social Dependency for Recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04522, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. H. Ma, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Learning to recommend with social trust ensemble. Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval SIGIR 09, 29A(6):203--210, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. H. Ma, H. Yang, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. SoRec : Social Recommendation Using Probabilistic Matrix Factorization. Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, 08pages: 0--9, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. H. Ma, D. Zhou, C. Liu, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Recommender systems with social regularization. Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, (January 2016):287--296, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. H. Mahyar. Detection of Top-K Central Nodes in Social Networks: A Compressive Sensing Approach. In IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2015, Paris, France, pages 902--909, Aug. 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. H. Mahyar, H. R. Rabiee, and Z. S. Hashemifar. UCS-NT: An Unbiased Compressive Sensing Framework for Network Tomography. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2013, Vancouver, Canada, pages 4534--4538, May 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. H. Mahyar, H. R. Rabiee, Z. S. Hashemifar, and P. Siyari. UCS-WN: An Unbiased Compressive Sensing Framework for Weighted Networks. In Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2013, Baltimore, USA, pages 1--6, Mar. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. H. Mahyar, H. R. Rabiee, A. Movaghar, E. Ghalebi, and A. Nazemian. CS-ComDet: A Compressive Sensing Approach for Inter-Community Detection in Social Networks. In IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2015, Paris, France, pages 89--96, Aug. 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. H. Mahyar, H. R. Rabiee, A. Movaghar, R. Hasheminezhad, E. Ghalebi, and A. Nazemian. A Low-cost Sparse Recovery Framework for Weighted Networks under Compressive Sensing. In IEEE International Conference on Social Computing and Networking, SocialCom 2015, Chengdu, China, pages 183--190, Dec. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. P. Mandl. Asymptotic Statistics 2., volume 42. 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. P. Massa and P. Avesani. Controversial users demand local trust metrics: an experimental study on epinions.com community. In Proc. American Association for Artificial Intelligence Conf., pages 121--126, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. M. S. Nikulin. Hellinger distance. Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. W. Reafee, N. Salim, and A. Khan. The power of implicit social relation in rating prediction of social recommender systems. PloS one, 11(5):e0154848, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. F. Ricci, L. Rokach, and B. Shapira. Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook. In Recommender Systems Handbook, number OCTOBER, pages 1--35. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. G. Shani and A. Gunawardana. Evaluating recommendation systems. Recommender systems handbook, pages 257--298, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. X. Su and T. M. Khoshgoftaar. A Survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques. Adv. Artif. Intell., 3(Section 3):1--19, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Z. Sun, G. Guo, and J. Zhang. Exploiting implicit item relationships for recommender systems. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pages 252--264. Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Z. Sun, L. Han, W. Huang, X. Wang, X. Zeng, M. Wang, and H. Yan. Recommender systems based on social networks. Journal of Systems and Software, 99: 109--119, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. J. Tang, X. Hu, H. Gao, and H. Liu. Exploiting Local and Global Social Context for Recommendation. In IJCAI, pages 264--269, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. M. Tavakolifard and S. J. Knapskog. Trust Evaluation Initialization Using Contextual Information. Number August. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Y. Wang, L. Li, and G. Liu. Social context-aware trust inference for trust enhancement in social network based recommendations on service providers. World Wide Web, 18(1):159--184, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. B. Yang, Y. Lei, D. Liu, and J. Liu. Social collaborative filtering by trust. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2747--2753, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. X. Yang, Y. Guo, Y. Liu, and H. Steck. A survey of collaborative filtering based social recommender systems. Computer Communications, 41:1--10, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. W. Yao, J. He, G. Huang, and Y. Zhang. Modeling dual role preferences for trust-aware recommendation. In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval, pages 975--978. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. W. Yuan, D. Guan, Y.-K. Lee, S. Lee, and S. J. Hur. Improved trust-aware recommender system using small-worldness of trust networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3):232--238, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Y. Zhang, W. Chen, and Z. Yin. Collaborative filtering with social regularization for tv program recommendation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 54:310--317, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. J. Zhu, H. Ma, C. Chen, and J. Bu. Social recommendation using low-rank semidefinite program. In AAAI, pages 158--163, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Extracting Implicit Social Relation for Social Recommendation Techniques in User Rating Prediction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader