Hybrid Trust-Aware Model for Personalized Top-N Recommendation

ABSTRACT

Due to the large quantity and diversity of content being easily available to users, recommender systems (RS) have become an integral part of nearly every online system. They allow users to resolve the information overload problem by proactively generating high-quality personalized recommendations. Trust metrics help leverage preferences of similar users and have led to improved predictive accuracy which is why they have become an important consideration in the design of RSs. We argue that there are additional aspects of trust as a human notion, that can be integrated with collaborative filtering techniques to suggest to users items that they might like. In this paper, we present an approach for the top-N recommendation task that computes prediction scores for items as a user specific combination of global and local trust models to capture differences in preferences. Our experiments show that the proposed method improves upon the standard trust model and outperforms competing top-N recommendation approaches on real world data by upto 19%.

References

1. S. Adali, R. Escriva, M. K. Goldberg, M. Hayvanovych, M. Magdon-Ismail, B. K. Szymanski, W. Wallace, G. Williams, et al. Measuring behavioral trust in social networks. In Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, pages 150--152. IEEE, 2010.
2. A.-L. Barabasi and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. science, 286(5439):509--512, 1999.
3. E. Christakopoulou and G. Karypis. Local item-item models for top-n recommendation. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 67--74. ACM, 2016.
4. L. De Lathauwer, B. De Moor, and J. Vandewalle. A multilinear singular value decomposition. SIAM journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 21(4):1253--1278, 2000.
5. J. Golbeck, B. Parsia, and J. Hendler. Trust networks on the semantic web. Springer, 2003.
6. Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 263--272. Ieee, 2008.
7. S. P. Marsh. Formalising trust as a computational concept. 1994.
8. P. Massa and P. Avesani. Trust-aware recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 17--24. ACM, 2007.
9. A. Merchant, T. Jha, and N. Singh. The use of trust in social machines. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pages 787--792. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2016.
10. X. Ning and G. Karypis. Slim: Sparse linear methods for top-n recommender systems. In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining, pages 497--506. IEEE, 2011.
11. J. O'Donovan and B. Smyth. Trust in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 167--174. ACM, 2005.
12. N. Pappas and A. Popescu-Belis. Combining content with user preferences for ted lecture recommendation. In Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI), 2013 11th International Workshop on, pages 47--52. IEEE, 2013.
13. W. Sherchan, S. Nepal, and C. Paris. A survey of trust in social networks. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(4):47, 2013.
14. S. Trifunovic, F. Legendre, and C. Anastasiades. Social trust in opportunistic networks. In INFOCOM IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, 2010, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2010.
15. C.-N. Ziegler. Towards decentralized recommender systems. PhD thesis, Institut für Informatik, 2005.