Nidhi Vij
J. Ramon Gil-Garcia
ABSTRACT
Adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) in governance contexts is considered empowering for governments and the citizens. Digital governance aims at transforming internal processes, structures and working practices leading to greater efficiency and transparency. Simultaneously, with open and digital governance accompanied by the Internet and other emergent technologies, the engagement between citizens and governments is expected to be greater than ever. However, it is not clear to what extent ICT initiatives are truly empowering citizens and government managers. In order to understand how ICT initiatives have been empowering citizens, we propose a conceptual framework and some preliminary findings. Based on a systematic review of recent literature, the framework should be useful for assessing the levels of empowerment produced or facilitated by different ICT initiatives. As an ongoing research, we also share some preliminary findings from selected ICT initiatives across India.
- Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. and Grimes, J.M. 2010. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly. 27, 3 (2010), 264--271.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bhatnagar, S.C. 2004. E-Government: From Vision to Implementation: A Practical Guide with Case Studies. Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
- Bhatnagar, S.C. 2000. Social implications of information and communication technology in developing countries: lessons from Asian success stories. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries. 1, 4 (2000), 1--9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bhatnagar, S.C. and Schware, R. 2000. Information and communication technology in development: cases from India. Sage Publications Ltd. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cecchini, S. and Scott, C. 2003. Can information and communications technology applications contribute to poverty reduction? Lessons from rural India. Information Technology for Development. 10, 2 (2003), 73--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chawla, R. and Bhatnagar, S. 2004. Online delivery of land titles to rural farmers in Karnataka, India. A case study from reducing poverty, sustaining growth: What works, what doesn't, and why a global exchange for scaling up success (Shanghai, May 2004).Google Scholar
- Collins, D. 1995. Rooting for Empowerment? Empowerment in Organizations. 3, 2 (1995), 25--33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. 1988. The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review. 13, 3 (1988), 471--482.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Florin, P. and Wandersman, A. 1990. An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology. 18, 1 (Feb. 1990), 41--54.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kelly Garrett, R. 2006. Protest in an Information Society: a review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society. 9, 2 (2006), 202--224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keniston, K. 2002. Grassroots ICT projects in India: Some preliminary hypotheses. ASCI Journal of Management. 31, 1 (2002), 2.Google Scholar
- Laverack, G. and Wallerstein, N. 2001. Measuring community empowerment: a fresh look at organizational domains. Health Promotion International. 16, 2 (2001), 179.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lyons, M., Smuts, C. and Stephens, A. 2001. Participation, empowerment and sustainability:(How) do the links work? Urban Studies. 38, 8 (2001), 1233.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maru, V. 2010. Allies unknown: social accountability and legal empowerment. Legal Empowerment: Practitioners' Perspectives. (2010), 81.Google Scholar
- McWhirter, E.H. 1991. Empowerment in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development. 69, 3 (1991), 222--27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moore, M. 2001. Empowerment at last? Journal of International Development. 13, 3 (2001), 321--329.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Perkins, D.D. and Zimmerman, M.A. 1995. Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology. 23, 5 (1995), 569--579.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pimbert, M. and Wakeford, T. 2001. Overview: Deliberative democracy and citizen empowerment. PLA notes. 40, (2001), 23--28.Google Scholar
- Renn, O. and Schweizer, P.-J. 2009. Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making. Environmental Policy and Governance. 19, 3 (May 2009), 174--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rowlands, J. 1995. Empowerment examined. Development in Practice. 5, 2 (1995), 101--107.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas, P. 2009. Bhoomi, Gyan Ganga, e-governance and the right to information: ICTs and development in India. Telematics and Informatics. 26, 1 (Feb. 2009), 20--31. Google ScholarDigital Library
- United Nations 2016. United Nations Global E-Government Ranking Index.Google Scholar
- Vij, N. 2013. Empowering the marginalized: Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act in India. Human Affairs. 23, 1 (2013), 91--104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zimmerman, M.A. 1995. Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology. 23, 5 (1995), 581--599.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Promoting social participation through digital governance: identifying barriers in the brazilian public administration
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data AgePublic organizations are expanding their use of the democratic potential of information and communication technologies to promote the engagement of civil society in their organizational processes. Therefore, it is possible to perceive the transformation ...
Individual Empowerment through Digital Governance: Proposing an Assessment Framework for India
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the Special Collection on eGovernment Innovations in IndiaAdoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) in governance contexts is considered empowering for governments and citizens. Digital Governance aims at transforming internal processes, structures and working practices leading to greater ...
Convergence or Conflict?: Digital Identities vs. Citizenship Rights: Case Study of Unique Identification Number, Aadhaar, in India
ICEGOV '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceUse of biometric information to access communication devices or information has become the new standard against identity theft and cybersecurity. Integration of financial data with biometric information is enthusiastically offered as an innovative ...
Comments