skip to main content
10.1145/3047273.3047374acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring the Role of Social Media in e-Government: an Analysis of Emerging Literature

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Driven by rising citizen expectations and the need for government innovation, social media has become a key component of e-government in a very short period of time. A number of research papers have been published on the role of social media in e-government in last few years. This study performs a literature review of the articles on the use of social media for getting access to e-government websites from the perspective of citizens. The database search through Scopus resulted in 115 articles, which formed the basis of this literature review. The keywords analysis of these articles indicates that 'e-government' and 'social media' were the most explored keywords across these studies. The methodological analysis indicates that the majority of the studies were analytical/conceptual/descriptive/theoretical in nature. The theoretical analysis, however, indicates that there is a lack of such research that has used some well-established theories or models to understand this concept. The review of literature further indicates that research themes such as 'electronic participation', 'engagement', 'transparency', 'communication/ interaction', 'trust' and 'collaboration' were found as some of the most frequently used categories under this area of research.

References

  1. Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. 2015. Citizens' engagement on local governments' facebook sites. an empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32,1, 52--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. 2012. Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6, 1, 78--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chui, M., Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Sarrazin, H., Sands, G. and Westergren, M., 2012. The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. McKinsey Global Institute, 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Goncalves, J., Liu, Y., Xiao, B., Chaudhry, S., Hosio, S., & Kostakos, V. 2015. Increasing the reach of government social media: A case study in modeling government-citizen interaction on Facebook. Policy and Internet, 7,1, 80--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mergel, I. (2014). Social media adoption: Toward a representative, responsive or interactive government?. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research,163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kavanaugh, A. L., Fox, E. A., Sheetz, S. D., Yang, S., Li, L. T., Shoemaker, D. J., and Xie, L. 2012. Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 4, 480--491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Picazo-Vela, S., Gutierrez-Martınez, I., and Luna-Reyes, L. F. 2012. Understanding Risks, Benefits, and Strategic Alternatives of Social Media Applications in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 4, 504--511.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cotterill, S. and King, S., 2007, September. Public sector partnerships to deliver local e-government: A social network study. In International Conference on Electronic Government, 240--251, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kaigo, M., & Okura, S. 2016. Exploring fluctuations in citizen engagement on a local government Facebook page in japan. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 2, 584--595. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. 2013. Connecting citizens and local governments? social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 4, 351--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Alarabiat, A., Soares, D. S. and Estevez, E. 2016, September. Electronic Participation with a Special Reference to Social Media-A Literature Review. In International Conference on Electronic Participation 41--52. Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Boudjelida, A., Mellouli, S., and Lee, J. 2016. Electronic citizens participation: Systematic review. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (01-03-March-2016), 31--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Delone, W. H. and McLean, E. R., 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19, 4, 9--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Song, C., & Lee, J. 2015. Citizens use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government. Public Performance and Management Review, 39,2, 430--453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Al-Jamal, M., and Abu-Shanab, E. 2016. The influence of open government on e-government website: the case of Jordan. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 82, 159--179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bailey, A., & Ngwenyama, O. 2011. The challenge of e-participation in the digital city: Exploring generational influences among community telecentre users. Telematics and Informatics, 283, 204--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. 2015. Understanding risk communication gaps through E-government website and twitter hashtag content analyses: The case of indonesia's mt. sinabung eruption. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 12,2, 351--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kim, K., & Sun, W. 2012. Assessing citizen service platform system success in government 2.0. Paper presented at the Proceedings - 2012 IEEE Symposium on Robotics and Applications, (ISRA 2012), 396--399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Scott, M., DeLone, W., & Golden, W. 2011. IT quality and egovernment net benefits: A citizen perspective. Paper presented at the 19th European Conference on Information Systems, (ECIS 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Chatfield, A. T., Reddick, C. G., & Brajawidagda, U. 2015. Government surveillance disclosures, bilateral trust and indonesia-australia cross-border security cooperation: Social network analysis of twitter data. Government Information Quarterly, 32,2, 118--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Park, M. J., Choi, H., & Rho, J. J. 2014. Citizen patronage behavior of government social media services: Extended perspective of perceived value with the moderating effect of media synchronicity. Information Development, 32,3, 293--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Porumbescu, G. A. 2016. Linking public sector social media and e-government website use to trust in government. Government Information Quarterly, 33,2, 291--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Avison, D. E., Dwivedi, Y. K., Fitzgerald, G. and Powell, P., 2008. The beginnings of a new era: time to reflect on 17 years of the ISJ. Information Systems Journal, 18,1, 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Mustafee, N. and Williams, M. D., 2009. Profiling a decade of Information Systems Frontiers' research. Information Systems Frontiers, 11,1, 87--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Alexopoulos, C., Zuiderwijk, A., Charapabidis, Y., Loukis, E. and Janssen, M., 2014, September. Designing a second generation of open data platforms: Integrating open data and social media. In International Conference on Electronic Government, 230--241. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ayachi, R., Boukhris, I., Mellouli, S., Amor, N. B. and Elouedi, Z., 2015. Proactive and reactive e-government services recommendation. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ceron, A., & Negri, F. 2016. The "Social side" of public policy: Monitoring online public opinion and its mobilization during the policy cycle. Policy and Internet, 8,2, 131--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Joshi, D., & Rosenfield, E. 2013. MP transparency, communication links and social media: A comparative assessment of 184 parliamentary websites. Journal of Legislative Studies, 19,4, 526--545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Alzouma, G., 2015. 'The opportunity exists. Why don't they seize it?' Political In Competence and the Potential of ICTs for Good Governance in Niger Republic. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 4,1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Dixon, B. E. 2010. Towards e-government 2.0: An assessment of where e-government 2.0 is and where it is headed. Public Administration and Management, 15, 2, 418--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. MacIel, C., Roque, L., & Garcia, A. C. B. 2010. Interaction and communication resources in collaborative e-democratic environments: The democratic citizenship community. Information Polity, 15,1--2, 73--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Boudjelida, A. and Soares, D. S., 2016. Electronic Participation through Social Media. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 191--194. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ashby, S., Vieira, T., Hanna, J., Abreu, F., Oakley, I., & Campos, P. 2015. Citizen X: Designing for holistic community engagement. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 28, 178--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Bødker, S., & Zander, P. O. 2015. Participation in design between public sector and local communities. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (27-30-June-2015),49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Boughzala, I., Janssen, M., & Assar, S. 2015. E-government 2.0: Back to reality, a 2.0 application to vet. Case studies in E-government 2.0: Changing citizen relationships, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Brainard, L. A., & McNutt, J. G. 2010. Virtual government-citizen relations: Informational, transactional, or collaborative? Administration and Society, 42,7, 836--858.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Buccafurri, F., Fotia, L. and Lax, G. 2012, September. Allowing continuous evaluation of citizen opinions through social networks. In International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, 242--25, Springer Berlin Heidelber. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Elvira, M., & Martynov, A. 2016. Use of social media by the federal government in Russia. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (01-03-March-2016),394--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Chesñevar, C., Maguitman, A., Esteve, E., & Brena, R. 2012. Integrating argumentation technologies and context-based search for intelligent processing of citizens' opinion in social media. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 166--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Elvira, N. I. C. A., Popescu, G. H., NICOLĂESCU, E. and Constantin, V.D., 2014. The Effectiveness of Social Media Implementation at Local Government Levels. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 10, SI, 152--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ganapati, S. 2011. Uses of public participation geographic information systems applications in E-government. Public Administration Review, 71,3, 425--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Grigoryeva, I., Vidiasova, L., & Zhuk, D. 2016. Seniors' inclusion into e-governance: Social media, e-services, e-petitions usage. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (01-03-March-2016), 173--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., ... Pardo, T. 2012. Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, 17,2, 83--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Hwang, J., & Mohammed, A. B. 2008. Approaching e-democracy: A case study analysis from Jordan. Paper presented at the Proceedings - 3rd International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, (ICCIT 2008), 2, 932--939. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Máchová, R., & Lněnička, M. 2015. Reframing E-government development indices with respect to new trends in ICT. Review of Economic Perspectives, 15,4, 383--411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Mambrey, P. 2008. From participation to e-participation: The German case. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 35,1, 355--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Mureşan, M., 2010, August. E-governance-a challenge for the regional sustainable development in Romania. In International Conference on Electronic Government, 238--250, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Porwol, L., Hassan, I., Ojo, A. and Breslin, J., 2015, August. A Knowledge Extraction and Management Component to Support Spontaneous Participation. In International Conference on Electronic Participation, 68--80, Springer International Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Rojas, J. M., Ruiz, C. J., & Farfan, C. 2011. E-participation and e-governance at web 2.0 in local governments of Colombia. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 301--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. 2012. Are government Internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29,SUPPL. 1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Slaviero, C., Maciel, C., Alencar, F. B., Santana, E. C., & Souza, P. C. 2010. Designing a platform to facilitate the development of virtual e-participation environments. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 385--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Vicente, M. R., & Novo, A. 2014. An empirical analysis of e-participation: The role of social networks and e-government over citizens' online engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 31,3, 379--387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Wigand, F. D. L. 2010. A Framework for Citizen-Centric Government Websites. E-Government Website Development: Future Trends and Strategic Models: Future Trends and Strategic Models, 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Abdallah, S. and Khalil, A. 2009. Web 2.0 And E-Governments: An Exploration Of Potentials & Realities In The Arab World. In Proceeding of European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, (Crowne Plaza Hotel, Izmir, July, 2009), 13--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. 2012. Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 292, 123--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Fink, D. 2011. Road safety 2.0: A case of transforming government's approach to road safety by engaging citizens through web 2.0. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 13,3, 21--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Halpern, D., Rozaidi, N. A., & Ki, S. 2012. Towards a social network e-government agenda?: Measuring participation 2.0 in the Arab world. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 223--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Hepburn, P. 2014. Local democracy in a digital age: Lessons for local government from the Manchester congestion charge referendum. Local Government Studies, 40,1, 82--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Kim, B. J. and Kleinschmit, S. W., 2012, October. A logistic multilevel model for civic engagement and community group impact in the digital age. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance 34--37. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Levy, A., Bagby, J. W., & Trauth, E. M. 2013. E-government evolution in small municipalities in Pennsylvania in web 2.0 social environment: A poster. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 273--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Liden, G., & Larsson, A. O. 2016. From 1.0 to 2.0: Swedish municipalities online. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Liu, S. M., & Yuan, Q. 2015. The evolution of information and communication technology in public administration. Public Administration and Development, 35,2, 140--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Mejabi, O. V., & Fabgule, J. O. 2014. Engaging citizens through social media - how state governors in Nigeria are doing. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (2014-January), 85--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Missingham, R. 2011. E-parliament: Opening the door. Government Information Quarterly, 28,3, 426--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Pardo, T., Cook, M., & Hrdinová, J. 2011. Investing in open government: Applying lessons from research and practice. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 367--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Bargh, M. S., Meijer, R., Choenni, S., & Conradie, P. 2014. Privacy protection in data sharing: Towards feedback based solutions. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (2014-January 28--36). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Ganim, M. A. M., & Kamruzzaman, M. 2014. E-governance using social network: A model for strong democratic environment in Bangladesh. Paper presented at the 16th Int'l Conf. Computer and Information Technology, (ICCIT 2013), 218--223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Kacem, A., Belkaroui, R., Jemal, D., Ghorbel, H., Faiz, R., & Abid, I. H. 2016. Towards improving e-government services using social media-based citizen's profile investigation. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (01-03-March-2016),187--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Reddick, C. G., Chatfield, A. T., & Jaramillo, P. A. 2015. Public opinion on national security agency surveillance programs: A multi-method approach. Government Information Quarterly, 32,2, 129--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Chatfield, A. T., & Brajawidagda, U. 2014. Crowdsourcing hazardous weather reports from citizens via twittersphere under the short warning lead times of EF5 intensity tornado conditions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2231--2241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Chhabra, S., Pal, J., & Goel, D. 2013. Action will be taken: Delhi traffic police@fb. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development, (DEV 2013),19 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Cho, V. Y., Esfahbod, B., & Mansouri, M. 2012. City of New York on twitter: @NYCGov. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 274--275 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Shah, B. P., & Lim, N. 2011. Using social media to increase e-government adoption in developing countries. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 205--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Tsui, H. D., Lee, C. Y. and Yao, C.B. 2010. Creating a Web 2.0 government: Views and perspectives. 2010 2nd International Conference on Networking and Digital Society (ICNDS), 1, 648--651.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Tsui, H. D., Lee, C. Y. and Yao, C. B., 2010. E-government, politics and web 2.0. Paper presented at the NISS2010 - 4th International Conference on New Trends in Information Science and Service Science, 687--691.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Khasawneh, R. T., & Tarawneh, M. M. 2016. Citizens' attitudes towards e-government presence on social networks e-government 2.0: An empirical study. Paper presented at the 2016 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems, (ICICS 2016), 45--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. 2011. Social media in the public sector: Perceived benefits, costs and strategic alternatives. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 198--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Sun, P. L., Ku, C. Y. and Shih, D. H., 2015. An implementation framework for E-Government 2.0. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 3, 504--520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Yaseen, H., Dingley, K., & Adams, C. 2015. The government's role in raising awareness towards e-commerce adoption: The case of Jordan. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG,(2015-January), 316--323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Hui, G., & Hayllar, M. R. 2010. Creating public value in e-government: A public-private-citizen collaboration framework in web 2.0. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, SUPPL. 1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Kokkinakos, P., Koussouris, S., Panopoulos, D., Askounis, D., Ramfos, A., Georgousopoulos, C., & Wittern, E. 2012. Citizens collaboration and co-creation in public service delivery: The COCKPIT project. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 8, 3, 44--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Pop, D., Echeverria, A. and Vidagany, J. V., 2014, Integrating Social Media and Open Data in a Cloud-Based Platform for Public Sector Advertising. In International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (October, 2014),105--116. Springer International Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Traunmüller, R., 2010, August. Web 2.0 creates a new government. In International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, 77--83, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Szkuta, K., Pizzicannella, R. and Osimo, D. 2014. Collaborative approaches to public sector innovation: A scoping study. Telecommunications Policy, 38, 5, pp.558--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Linders, D. 2012. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29,4, 446--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. 2015. Active and passive crowdsourcing in government. Policy practice and digital science: Integrating complex systems, social simulation and public administration in policy research, 261--289Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Spiliotopoulou, L., Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E. N., & Diamantopoulou, V. 2014. A framework for advanced social media exploitation in government for crowdsourcing. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8,4, 545--568.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Warner, J., 2011. Next steps in e-government crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 177--181,ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Pop, D., Moumtzi, V. and Farinos, J. 2014. The good, the bad and the beauty of advertisement for public sector services. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on e-Government: (ECEG 2014), 210, Academic Conferences Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Prandini, M., & Ramilli, M. 2011. Security considerations about the adoption of web 2.0 technologies in sensitive e-government processes. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 285--288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Reddick, C., & Anthopoulos, L. 2014. Interactions with e-government, new digital media and traditional channel choices: Citizen-initiated factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8,3, 398--419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Alanazi, J. M., & Chatfield, A. T. 2012. Sharing government-owned data with the public: A cross-country analysis of open data practice in the Middle East. Paper presented at the 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2012, (AMCIS 2012), 1, 335--344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Williams, M. D., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B. and Schwarz, A., 2009. Contemporary trends and issues in IT adoption and diffusion research. Journal of Information Technology, 24, 1, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. Mulgan, G., & Blears, H. 2011. People & participation: How to put citizens at the heart of decision-making. Involve-Together-We-Can, 1--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Ferranti, D. M. D. 2009. How to improve governance: A new framework for analysis and action. Brookings Institution Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Florini, A. 2007. The right to know: Transparency for an open world. Columbia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., and Dwivedi, Y. K. (2012). A Bibliometric Analysis of Articles citing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. In Y.K. Dwivedi, M.R. Wade, S.L. Schneberger (Eds.): Information System Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, Vol. 1, 37--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  98. Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., and Williams, M. D. (2013). E-government adoption research: An analysis of the employee's perspective. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 14(4), 414--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., and Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Systematic Review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., and Williams, M. D. (2014). A Review and Weight Analysis of the Predictors and Linkages in Electronic Government Adoption Research. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 8(2), pp. 139--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Rana, N. P., Williams, M. D., and Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Analysing Challenges, Barriers and CSFs of E-Government Adoption Research. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 7(2), 177--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Exploring the Role of Social Media in e-Government: an Analysis of Emerging Literature

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
        March 2017
        657 pages
        ISBN:9781450348256
        DOI:10.1145/3047273

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 March 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader