skip to main content
10.1145/3047273.3047398acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

The Power of WhatsApp as a Communication Tool for Elections Observation and Monitoring in KwaZulu-Natal: NGO Case Study in South Africa

Published:07 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The KwaZulu Natal Civil Society Coalition (KZNCSOC) deployed 28 monitors and 850 observers throughout the province to ensure the elections are conducted in a free and fair atmosphere. This paper presents experiences from this electoral team that utilized WhatsApp as a tool for relaying information amongst themselves and the control centre in reporting incidences as they occurred in various parts of the province. The main findings emanating from this project were that monitors found it easier to communicate with another while in the field and could secure critical advice real time for effective decision making. It also enabled real time reporting of incidences relating to electoral violence to security agencies who in most cases responded immediately and quelled violence. The paper contends that election monitoring and its management can be made effective when communication tools such as WhatsApp are utilized. The paper concludes that such platforms should be institutionalized by electoral agencies as effective tools for electoral monitoring and management.

References

  1. Aubyn, F.K., 2012. Election Observation and Democratic Consolidation in Africa: The Ghanaian Experience. Managing election-related violence for democratic stability in Ghana, 240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Diamond, L., Linz, J., and Lipset, S.M., 1990. Politics in developing countries. Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ekine, S., 2010. SMS uprising: Mobile activism in Africa. Fahamu/Pambazuka.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Etzo, S. and Collender, G., 2010. The mobile phone 'revolution'in africa: Rhetoric or realty? African affairs, adq045.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Litosseliti, L., 2003. Using focus groups in research. A&C Black.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Pran, V. and Merloe, P., 2007. Monitoring Electronic Technologies in Electoral Processes. National Democratic Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Schulz-Herzenberg, C., 2009. Elections and accountability in South Africa. Institute for Security Studies Papers, 188, 28 p.-28 p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Wasserman, H., 2011. Mobile phones, popular media, and everyday African democracy: Transmissions and transgressions. Popular Communication 9, 2, 146--158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
    March 2017
    657 pages
    ISBN:9781450348256
    DOI:10.1145/3047273

    Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 March 2017

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader