skip to main content
10.1145/305619.305620acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Time-constrained scheduling of weighted packets on trees and meshes

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 June 1999Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.M. Adler, A.L. Rosenberg, R.K. Sitaraman, and W. Unger (1998), "Scheduling time-constrained communication in linear networks", l Oth A CM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures 269-278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.M. Andrews, A. Fernandez, M. Harchol-Balter, F.T. Leighton, L. Zhang (1997): General dynamic routing with per-packet delay guarantees of O(distance + 1/session rate). 38th IEEE Syrup. on Foundations of Computer Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.M. Andrews and L. Zhang (1999): Packet routing with arbitrary end-to-end delay requirements. 31st A CM Syrup. on Theory of Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.S.N. Bhatt, G. Bilardi, G. Pucci, A.G. Ranade, A.L. Rosenberg, E.J. Schwabe (1996): On bufferless routing of variable-length messages in leveled networks. IEEE Trans. Cornp. ~5, 714-729. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.R. Games, A. Kevsky, P. Krupp, L. Monk (1995): Realtime communications scheduling for massively parallel processors. Real-Time Technology and Applications Syrnp., 76-85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.S.J. Golestani (1991): Congestion-free communication in high-speed packet networks. IEEE Trans. Communications 39, 1802-1812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. 7.V. Guruswami, S. Khanna, B. Shepherd, R. Rajaraman and M. Yannakakis (1999). Near-Optimal Hardness Results and Approximation Algorithms for Edge-Disjoint Paths and Related Problems. To appear in 31st ACM Syrup. on Theory of Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.J. H&stad. Clique is hard to approximate within n1-e (1996). 37th IEEE Syrup. on Foundations of Computer Science, 627-636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.J.H. Kim and A.A. Chien (1996): Rotating Combined Queuing (RCQ): Bandwidth and latency guarantees in low-cost, high-performance networks. 23rd Intl. Syrup. on Computer Architecture, 226-236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.C. Lam, H. Jiang, V.C. Hamacher (1995): Design and analysis of hierarchical ring networks for shared-memory multiprocessors. Intl. Conf. on Parallel Processing, I:46-50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.F.T. Leighton (1992): Methods for message routing in parallel machines (invited survey). 2~th A CM Syrnp. on Theory of Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.F.T. Leighton (1992): Introduction to Parallel Algorithms and Architectures: Arrays ~ Trees , Hypercubes. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.J. Liebeherr (1995): Multimedia networks: issues and challenges. IEEE Computer 28 (4) 68-69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.J.-P. Li and M.W. Mutka (1994): Priority based realtime communication for large scale wormhole networks. Intl. Parallel Proc. Syrup., 433-438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.K.-S. Lui and S. Zaks (1998): Scheduling in synchronous networks and the greedy algorithm. Theoretical Comp. Sci. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.M.W. Mutka (1994): Using rate monotonic scheduling technology for real-time communications in a wormhole network. Wkshp. on Parallel and Distr. Real-Time Computing Systs. and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.A.K. Parekh and R.G. Gallager (1993): A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks: the single-node case. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking i, 344-357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.A.K. Parekh and R.G. Gallager (1994): A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks: the multiple-node case. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 2, 137-150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.h. eietracaprina and F.P. Preparata (1995): Bufferless packet routing in high-speed networks. Typescript, Brown Univ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.J. Rexford, J. Hall, K.G. Shin. (1996): ~A router architecture for real-time point-to-point networks. 23rd Intl. Syrnp. Computer Architecture. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.A. Saha (1995): Simulator for real-time parallel processing architectures. IEEE Ann. Simulation Syrup., 74-83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.L.R. Welch and K. Toda (1994): Architectural support for real-time systems: issues and trade-offs. Intl. Wkshp. on Real-Time Computing Systs. and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.L. Zhang (1990): Virtual clock: A new traffic control algorithm for packet switching networks. A CM SIGCOMM, 19-29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.W. Zhao, J.A. Stankovic, K. Ramamritham (1990)- A window protocol for transmission of time-constrained messages. {EEE Trans. Computers 39, 1186-1203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Time-constrained scheduling of weighted packets on trees and meshes

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SPAA '99: Proceedings of the eleventh annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures
              June 1999
              261 pages
              ISBN:1581131240
              DOI:10.1145/305619

              Copyright © 1999 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 June 1999

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              SPAA '99 Paper Acceptance Rate26of90submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate447of1,461submissions,31%

              Upcoming Conference

              SPAA '24

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader