skip to main content
10.1145/3056662.3056707acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicscaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An axiomatic design framework for reliability improvement

Published:26 February 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Axiomatic Design methodology has been employed to solve technical problems in a variety of disciplines. This paper provides a robust framework useful to analyse the reliability of a large variety of systems, thus creating the correct environment to apply the AD axioms to develop good design solutions able to increase the system reliability. Furthermore, this paper proposes the use of a reliability matrix as a mean to evaluate the information content of the system through the analysis of the reliability of the components and of their dependent failure relationships. Once a global indicator is found, this data and the structure of reliability matrix can be used to evaluate and improve the proposed design solution.

References

  1. G. Arcidiacono, N. Costantino, K. Yang, "The AMSE Lean Six Sigma Governance Model" International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 7: 233--266 (2016)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. N.P. Suh. "Axiomatic Design advances and applications", Oxford Univ. Press. (2001)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Bhattacharya, "Reliability evaluation of systems with dependent failures", International Journal of Systems Science 27(9): 881--885 (1996)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. E.E. Lewis, "Introduction to reliability engineering", ed. J. Wiley p. 435 (1996)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. B. El-Haik, "Axiomatic quality: integrating axiomatic design with six-sigma, reliability, and quality engineering", ed. John Wiley 285 (2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. Arcidiacono, L. Bucciarelli, "TRIZ: Engineering Methodologies to Improve the Process Reliability", Quality Reliability Engineering International, (2016)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Arcidiacono, "Development of a FTA versus Parts Count Method Model: Comparative FTA" Quality Reliability Engineering International, 19: 411--424 (2004)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. Arcidiacono, P. Placidoli, "Reality and Illusion in Virtual Studios: Axiomatic Design Applied to Television Recording" Procedia CIRP 34: 137--142 (2015)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. Monti, A. Giorgetti, A. Girgenti, "An Axiomatic Design Approach for a Motorcycle Steering Damper" Procedia CIRP 34: 150--155 (2015)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. G. Arcidiacono, A. Giorgetti, M. Pugliese, "Axiomatic Design to improve PRM airport assistance". Procedia CIRP 34: 106--111 (2015)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. F. Rolli, A. Giorgetti, P. Citti, "Integration of Holistic Non-conformities Management and Axiomatic Design: A case study in Italian Income Tax Returns Management" Procedia CIRP 34: 256--261 (2015)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. K. Yang, J. Trewn, "A Treatise on System Reliability and Design Complexity", Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Axiomatic Design - ICAD2000: 162--168 (2000)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Yang, E. Cekecek, "Design Vulnerability Analysis and Design Improvement by Using Warranty Data" Quality Reliability Engineering International 20(2): 121--33 (2004)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. G. Arcidiacono, G. Campatelli, "Reliability Improvement of a Diesel Engine Using the FMETA Approach", Quality and Reliability Engineering International 20(2): 143--154 (2004)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. K. Yang, J. Trewn, "The relationship between system functions, reliability and dependent failures", International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics IEEE; 4722--7 (1998)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An axiomatic design framework for reliability improvement

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICSCA '17: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications
      February 2017
      339 pages
      ISBN:9781450348577
      DOI:10.1145/3056662

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 February 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader