skip to main content
research-article

Do Health Information Exchanges Deter Repetition of Medical Services?

Published:27 April 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Repetition of medical services by providers is one of the major sources of healthcare costs. The lack of access to previous medical information on a patient at the point of care often leads a physician to perform medical procedures that have already been done. Multiple healthcare initiatives and legislation at both the federal and state levels have mandated Health Information Exchange (HIE) systems to address this problem. This study aims to assess the extent to which HIE could reduce these repetitions, using data from Centers for Medicare 8 Medicaid Services and a regional HIE organization. A 2-Stage Least Square model is developed to predict the impact of HIE on repetitions of two classes of procedures: diagnostic and therapeutic. The first stage is a predictive analytic model that estimates the duration of tenure of each HIE member-practice. Based on these estimates, the second stage predicts the effect of providers’ HIE tenure on their repetition of medical services. The model incorporates moderating effects of a federal quality assurance program and the complexity of medical procedures with a set of control variables. Our analyses show that a practice's tenure with HIE significantly lowers the repetition of therapeutic medical procedures, while diagnostic procedures are not impacted. The medical reasons for the effects observed in each class of procedures are discussed. The results will inform healthcare policymakers and provide insights on the business models of HIE platforms.

References

  1. Allison, P. When Can You Safely Ignore Multicollinearity? 2012. Retrieved from http://statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. AMA. 2015. Physician Quality Reporting System. Retrieved February 2016 From http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/clinical-practice-improvement/clinical-quality/physician-quality-reporting-system.page.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Angrist and A. B. Krueger. 2001. Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. National Bureau of Economic Research 25 (2001), 69--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Aron, S. Dutta, R. Janakiraman, and P. A. Pathak. 2011. The impact of automation of systems on medical errors: Evidence from field research. Inform. Syst. Res. 22, 3 (2011), 429--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. S. Ash, M. A. Posner, J. Speckman, S. Franco, A. C. Yacht, and L. Bramwell. 2003. Using claims data to examine mortality trends following hospitalization for heart attack in Medicare. Health Serv. Res. 38, 5 (2003), 1253--1262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. M. Audet, M. M. Doty, J. Peugh, J. Shamasdin, K. Zapert, and S. Schoenbaum. 2004. Information technologies: When will they make it into physicians’ black bags. Medscape Gen. Med. 6, 4 (2004), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Baicker and J. Skinner. 2010. Health care spending growth and the future of US tax rates. In Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 25. University of Chicago Press, 39--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. E. Bailey, J. Y. Wan, L. M. Mabry, S. H. Landy, R. A. Pope, T. M. Waters, and M. E. Frisse. 2013. Does health information exchange reduce unnecessary neuroimaging and improve quality of headache care in the emergency department? J. Gen. Int. Med. 28, 2 (2013), 176--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. Banks and E. Galvez. 2012. E-prescribing adoption: A prescription for progress. 2012. Retrieved March 2016 from https://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/state-hie/eprescribing-adoption/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. I. Bardhan, S. Ayabakan, E. Zheng, and K. Kirksey. 2014. Value of health information sharing in reducing healthcare waste: An analysis of duplicate testing across hospitals. In Proceedings of the Thirty Fifth International Conference on Information Systems. Auckland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. I. Bardhan, K. Kirksey, J. h. Oh, and E. Zheng. 2011. A predictive model for readmission of patients with congestive heart failure: A multi-hospital perspective. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems 2011. 1--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. W. Bates, L. L. Leape, D. J. Cullen, N. Laird, L. A. Petersen, J. M. Teich, E. Burdick, M. Hickey, S. Kleefield, and B. Shea. 1998. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 280, 15 (1998), 1311--1316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. K. Bekelis, M. J. McGirt, S. L. Parker, C. M. Holland, J. Davies, C. J. Devin, T. Atkins, J. Knightly, R. Groman, and I. Zyung. 2015. The present and future of quality measures and public reporting in neurosurgery. Neurosurg. Focus 39, 6 (2015), E3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. G. Bentley, R. M. Effros, K. Palar, and E. B. Keeler. 2008. Waste in the US health care system: A conceptual framework. Milbank Quart. 86, 4 (2008), 629--659. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. D. M. Berwick and A. D. Hackbarth. 2012. Eliminating waste in US health care. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 307, 14 (2012), 1513--1516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. D. Blumenthal and M. Tavenner. 2010. The meaningful use regulation for electronic health records. New Engl. J. Med. 363, 6 (2010), 501--504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. P. Branger, A. van't Hooft, and H. Van Der Wouden. 1994. Coordinating shared care using electronic data interchange. Medinfo. 8 (1994), 1669--1669.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. L. Brown, G. F. Riley, N. Schussler, and R. Etzioni. 2002. Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from SEER-Medicare data. Med. Care 40, 8 (2002), IV-104-IV--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. B. Buntin, M. F. Burke, M. C. Hoaglin, and D. Blumenthal. 2011. The benefits of health information technology: A review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs 30, 3 (2011), 464--471. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. J. B. Buntin, J. J. Escarce, D. Goldman, H. Kan, M. J. Laugesen, and P. Shekelle. 2004. Increased Medicare expenditures for physicians’ services: What are the causes? J Health Care Organiz Provis. Financ. 41, 1 (2004), 83--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. C. W. Burt and E. Hing. 2005. Use of computerized clinical support systems in medical settings: United States, 2001--03. Adv. Data 353, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. K. R. Campbell. 2016. Fixing our EHR mess: What needs to be done. 2016. Retrieved October 2016 from http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2016/09/fixing-ehr-mess-needs-done.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. B. Chaudhry, J. Wang, S. Wu, M. Maglione, W. Mojica, E. Roth, S. C. Morton, and P. G. Shekelle. 2006. Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Int. Med. 144, 10 (2006), 742--752. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M. E. Chernew, K. Baicker, and J. Hsu. 2010. The specter of financial armageddon—health care and federal debt in the United States. New Engl. J. Med. 362, 13 (2010), 1166--1168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. CMS. About CMS. 2016. Retrieved March 2016 from https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/About-CMS.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 8 (1989), 982--1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. K. Davis, C. Schoen, and K. Stremikis. 2010. Mirror, mirror on the wall: How the performance of the U.S. Health Care System Compares InternationallyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. DHHS. Better Health Channel. 2015. Retrieved March 2016 from https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. B. E. Dowd, T. Swenson, S. Parashuram, R. Coulam, and R. Kane. 2016. PQRS Participation, inappropriate utilization of health care services, and Medicare expenditures. Medical Care Research and Review 1 (2016), 106--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. H. Fazio and M. P. Zanna. 1978. On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence1. J. Pers. 46, 2 (1978), 228--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. R. H. Fazio, M. P. Zanna, and J. Cooper. 1978. Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency: An information processing analysis. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 4, 1 (1978), 48--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. E. W. Ford, N. Menachemi, and M. T. Phillips. 2006. Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: When will health care be paperless? J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 13, 1 (2006), 106--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. A. J. Forster, H. J. Murff, J. F. Peterson, T. K. Gandhi, and D. W. Bates. 2003. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann. Int. Med. 138, 3 (2003), 161--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. J. F. Fries, C. E. Koop, C. E. Beadle, P. P. Cooper, M. J. England, R. F. Greaves, J. J. Sokolov, and D. Wright. 1993. Reducing health care costs by reducing the need and demand for medical services. New Engl. J. Med. 329, 5 (1993), 321--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. A. M. Garber and J. Skinner. 2008. Is American health care uniquely inefficient? J. Econ. Perspect. 22, 4 (2008), 27--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. A. Gelman. 2012. Multilevel (hierarchical) modeling: What it can and cannot do. Technometrics 48, 3 (2006), 432--435. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. G. D. Goetz, A. J. Kuzel, L. B. Feng, J. P. DeShazo, and L. E. Love. 2012. EHRs in primary care practices: Benefits, challenges, and successful strategies. Am. J. Manag. Care 18, 2 (2012), e48--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. HealthAffairs. 2015. Where Is HITECH's $35 Billion Dollar Investment Going? Retrieved from http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2015/03/04/where-is-hitechs-35-billion-dollar-investment-going/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. HealthcareITNews. 2015. Electronic Health Records. Retrieved October 2016 from http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/senator-blasts-ehr-program.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. HEALTHeLINK. 2016. Participating HEALTHeLINK Providers. Retrieved September 2014 from http://wnyhealthelink.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. H. R. Hetico and D. E. Marcinko. 2010. The Business of Medical Practice: Transformational Health 2.0 Skills for Doctors. Springer, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. R. Hillestad, J. Bigelow, A. Bower, F. Girosi, R. Meili, R. Scoville, and R. Taylor. 2005. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, Savings, and costs. Health Affairs 24, 5 (2005), 1103--1117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. J. M. Holroyd-Leduc, D. Lorenzetti, S. E. Straus, L. Sykes, and H. Quan. 2011. The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: A systematic review of the evidence. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 18, 6 (2011), 732--737. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. W. C. Hsiao, D. B. Yntema, P. Braun, D. Dunn, and C. Spencer. 1988. Measurement and analysis of intraservice work. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 260, 16 (1988), 2361--2370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. A. Jamal, K. McKenzie, and M. Clark. 2009. The impact of health information technology on the quality of medical and health care: a systematic review. Health Inf. Manag. J. 38, 3 (2009), 26--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. D. C. Kaelber and D. W. Bates. 2007. Health information exchange and patient safety. J. Biomed. Informat. 40, 6 (2007), S40--S45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. M. C. Katapodi, K. A. Lee, N. C. Facione, and M. J. Dodd. 2004. Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. Prev. Med. 38, 4 (2004), 388--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. L. T. Kohn, J. M. Corrigan, and M. S. Donaldson. 2000. To Err Is H uman: Building a Safer Health System. National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. J. Kwok and B. Jones. 2005. Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory. J. Clin. Pathol. 58, 5 (2005), 457--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. E. J. Lammers, J. Adler-Milstein, and K. E. Kocher. 2014. Does health information exchange reduce redundant imaging? Evid. Emerg. Dep. Med. Care 52, 3 (2014), 227--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. A. Lloyd. 2001. The extent of patients’ understanding of the risk of treatments. Qual. Health Care 10, suppl. 1 (2001), i14--i18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. C. H. Mason and W. D. Perreault Jr. 1991. Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. J. Market. Res. 268--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. S. Maxwell and S. Zuckerman. 2007. Impact of resource-based practice expenses on the medicare physician volume. Health Care Financ. Rev. 29, 2 (2007), 65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. D. J. Mazur, D. H. Hickam, and M. D. Mazur. 1999. How patients’ preferences for risk information influence treatment choice in a case of high risk and high therapeutic uncertainty asymptomatic localized prostate cancer. Med. Dec. Making 19, 4 (1999), 394--398. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. I. McDonald, J. Daly, V. Jelinek, F. Panetta, and J. Gutman. 1996. Opening pandora's box: The unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test result. Br. Med. J. 313, 7053 (1996), 329--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. A. R. Miller and C. Tucker. 2009. Privacy protection and technology diffusion: The case of electronic medical records. Manag. Sci. 55, 7 (2009), 1077--1093. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. S. Miyakis, G. Karamanof, M. Liontos, and T. D. Mountokalakis. 2006. Factors contributing to inappropriate ordering of tests in an academic medical department and the effect of an educational feedback strategy. Postgrad. Med. J. 82, 974 (2006), 823--829. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. C. Z. Mooney, R. D. Duval, and R. Duval. 1993. Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference. Sage, Thousans Oaks, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. J. A. Nelder and R. J. Baker. 1972. Generalized linear models. In Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. J. Neter, W. Wasserman, and M. H. Kutner. 1989. Applied Regression Models. Irwin, Homewood, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. L. Nguyen, E. Bellucci, and L. T. Nguyen. 2014. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. Int. J.Med. Inf. 83, 11 (2014), 779--796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. P. R. Orszag. 2008a. Evidence on the costs and benefits of health information technology. Testimony Before Congress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. P. R. Orszag. 2008b. The overuse, underuse, and misuse of health care. Statement Before the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. J. W. Osborne. 2000. The advantages of hierarchical linear modeling. Practical Assessment and Research Evaluation 7, 1 (2000). Available from: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=78n=1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Z. Ozdemir, J. Barron, and S. Bandyopadhyay. 2011. An analysis of the adoption of digital health records under switching costs. Inf. Syst. Res. 22, 3 (2011), 491--503. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. S. G. Pauker and J. P. Kassirer. 1975. Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis. New Engl. J. Med. 293, 5 (1975), 229--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. W. L. S. Peter, J. Liu, E. Weinhandl, and Q. Fan. 2008. A comparison of sevelamer and calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality, hospitalization, and morbidity in hemodialysis: A secondary analysis of the Dialysis Clinical Outcomes Revisited (DCOR) randomized trial using claims data. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 51, 3 (2008), 445--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. R. Platt and A. Ommaya. 2005. A beneficial side effect of the Medicare drug benefit. New Engl. J. Med. 353, 26 (2005), 2742--2743. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. L. Poissant, J. Pereira, R. Tamblyn, and Y. Kawasumi. 2005. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 12, 5 (2005), 505--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. S. Raudenbush and A. S. Bryk. 1986. A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociol. Educ. 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. W. A. Ray. 1997. Policy and program analysis using administrative databases. Ann. Int. Med. 127, 8 Part 2 (1997), 712--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. S. K. Riegg. 2008. Causal inference and omitted variable bias in financial aid research: Assessing solutions. Rev. High. Educ. 31, 3 (2008), 329--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. J. D. Sargan. 1958. The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica. 393--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. P. Shekelle, S. C. Morton, and E. B. Keeler. 2006. Costs and benefits of health information technology. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality US (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK37988/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. M. Sipkoff. 2010. HIEs are slow going but critical part of HIT. Manag. Care (Langhorne, PA) 19, 3 (2010), 30--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. S. Sivell, G. Elwyn, C. L. Gaff, A. J. Clarke, R. Iredale, C. Shaw, J. Dundon, H. Thornton, and A. Edwards. 2008. How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: Systematic review. J. Gen. Counsel. 17, 1 (2008), 30--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. P. C. Smith, R. Araya-Guerra, C. Bublitz, B. Parnes, L. M. Dickinson, R. Van Vorst, J. M. Westfall, and W. D. Pace. 2005. Missing clinical information during primary care visits. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 293, 5 (2005), 565--571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. M. Tabriz, K. Riederer, J. Baran, and R. Khatib. 2004. Repeating blood cultures during hospital stay: Practice pattern at a teaching hospital and a proposal for guidelines. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10, 7 (2004), 624--627. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. W. M. Tierney, C. J. McDondald, D. K. Martin, S. L. Hui, and M. P. Rogers. 1987. Computerized display of past test results: Effect on outpatient testing. Ann. Int. Med. 107, 4 (1987), 569--574. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. UCLA. 2016. How can I bootstrap estimates in SAS? Retrieved from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/faq/bootstrap.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. D. L. Veenstra, J. A. Roth, L. P. Garrison, S. D. Ramsey, and W. Burke. 2010. A formal risk-benefit framework for genomic tests: Facilitating the appropriate translation of genomics into clinical practice. Genet. Med. 12, 11 (2010), 686--693. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46, 2 (2000), 186--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. J. R. Vest, L. M. Kern, M. D. Silver, and R. Kaushal. 2015. The potential for community based health information exchange systems to reduce hospital readmissions. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 22, 2 (2015), 435--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. J. E. Wennberg, E. S. Fisher, T. A. Stukel, and S. M. Sharp. 2004. Use of medicare claims data to monitor provider-specific performance among patients with severe chronic illness. Health Affairs. VAR5-VAR18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. J. Westgard, T. Groth, T. Aronsson, H. Falk, and C. De Verdier. 1977. Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: probabilities for false rejection and error detection. Clin. Chem. 23, 10 (1977), 1857--1867.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. E. T. Wong. 1995. Improving laboratory testing: Can we get physicians to focus on outcome? Clin. Chem. 41, 8 (1995), 1241--1247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. J. M. Wooldridge. 2012. Instrumental variables estimation and two-stage least squares. J. M. Wooldridge (ed.). Introductory Econometrics (3rd ed.). 510--551.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. N. Yaraghi. 2015a. The benefits of health information exchange platforms: Measuring the returns on a half a billion dollar investment. Brookings Institution.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. N. Yaraghi. 2015b. An empirical analysis of the financial benefits of health information exchange in emergency departments. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 22, 6 (2015), 1169--1172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. N. Yaraghi, A. Y. Du, R. Sharman, R. D. Gopal, and R. Ramesh. 2013. Network effects in health information exchange growth. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 4, 1 (2013), 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. N. Yaraghi, A. Y. Du, R. Sharman, R. D. Gopal, and R. Ramesh. 2014a. Health information exchange as a multisided platform: Adoption, usage, and practice involvement in service co-production. Inf. Syst. Res. 26, 1 (2014a), 1--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. N. Yaraghi, A. Y. Du, R. Sharman, R. D. Gopal, R. Ramesh, R. Singh, and G. Singh. 2014b. Professional and geographical network effects on healthcare information exchange growth: Does proximity really matter? J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 21, 4 (2014b), 671--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, M. P. Couper, E. Singer, C. A. Levin, F. J. Fowler, S. Ziniel, P. A. Ubel, and A. Fagerlin. 2010. The DECISIONS study: A nationwide survey of united states adults regarding 9 common medical decisions. Med. Dec. Making 30, 5 Suppl. (2010), 20S--34S. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Do Health Information Exchanges Deter Repetition of Medical Services?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
      ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 8, Issue 1
      March 2017
      80 pages
      ISSN:2158-656X
      EISSN:2158-6578
      DOI:10.1145/3068852
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2017
      • Accepted: 1 February 2017
      • Revised: 1 December 2016
      • Received: 1 March 2016
      Published in tmis Volume 8, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader