ABSTRACT
Immersive theatre is a growing trend within theatre entertainment: audience members can now wander around performances and choose how the story unfolds in front of them. Technology can be used to create novel, multi-modal experiences for audiences in these performances; but when the rules of such an experience are ill-defined, how do users react to this technology? We present an evaluation of 25 performances of an immersive, in the dark performance. Issues of control can arise in situations where technology becomes an important part of such a performance. Participants take and relinquish control in three key areas: navigation, exploration and attention during the performance, and this affects their perception of both technology and the piece itself. We discuss how technology can play a positive role in immersive theatre and other cultural settings, yet its use must be carefully choreographed to ensure the audience experience matches the intended goal.
- Edwin Abbott Abbott. 1884. Flatland: A romance of many dimensions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Adam Alston. 2013. Audience Participation and Neoliberal Value?: Risk, agency and responsibility in immersive theatre. Performance Research 18, 2, 128--138.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul M Aoki, Rebecca E Grinter, Amy Hurst, Margaret H Szymanski, James D Thornton, and Allison Woodruff. 2002. Sotto Voce : Exploring the Interplay of Conversation and Mobile Audio Spaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02), ACM, 431--438. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dominique Barni. 2011. The Handheld Museum. Retrieved from http://museumsandmobiledevices.wordpress.com/Google Scholar
- Steve Benford, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, et al. 2006. Can You See Me Now? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 13, 1, 100--133. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve Benford, Gabriella Giannachi, Boriana Koleva, and Tom Rodden. 2009. From interaction to trajectories : Designing coherent journeys through user experiences. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), 709--718. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden. 2012. Uncomfortable Interactions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2005--2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew Chalmers and Areti Galani. 2004. Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems. Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, 243--252. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steven Dow, Jaemin Lee, Christopher Oezbek, Blair Macintyre, Jay David Bolter, and Maribeth Gandy. 2005. Exploring Spatial Narratives and Mixed Reality Experiences in Oakland Cemetery. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference Advances in Computer Entertainment (ACE '05), 51--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tom Froese and Adam Spiers. 2007. Toward a Phenomenological Pragmatics of Enactive Perception. Proceedings of the Conference on Enactive Interfaces (Enactive '07), 105--108.Google Scholar
- Alison L. Grinder and E. Sue McCoy. 1985. The Good Guide: A Sourcebook for Interpreters, Docents and Tour Guides. Ironwood Press.Google Scholar
- Nicholas A Guidice and Gordon E Legge. 2008. Blind navigation and the role of technology. In The Engineering Handbook of Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence. 479--500.Google Scholar
- Charlene Jennett, Paul Cairns, and Andrew Epps. Measuring and Defining the Experience of Immersion in Games. 1--44.Google Scholar
- Janet van der Linden, Yvonne Rogers, Maria Oshodi, et al. 2011. Haptic Reassurance in the Pitch Black for an Immersive Theatre Experience Conference Item Theatre Experience. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, 143--152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paige Mcginley. 2010. Next Up Downtown: A New Generation of Ensemble Performance. TDR/The Drama Review 4, 54, 11--38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Mcloughlin. 2011. Design Interventions for Open-Air Museums : Applying and Extending the Principles of "Assembly." Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 553--556. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald A Norman. 1986. Cognitive Engineering. In User Centred System Design, Donald A Norman and Stephen W Draper (eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 31--62.Google Scholar
- Spyros Papaioannou. 2014. Immersion, "smooth" spaces and critical voyeurism in the work of Punchdrunk. Studies in Theatre and Performance 34, 2, 160--174.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lisa Ran, Sumi Helal, and Steve Moore. 2004. Drishti: An integrated indoor/outdoor blind navigation system and service. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom '04), 23--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stuart Reeves. 2011. Designing interfaces in public settings: Understanding the role of the spectator in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Robinson, M. Jones, P. Eslambolchilar, R. Murray-Smith, and M. Lindborg. 2010. "I did it my way": moving away from the tyranny of turn-byturn pedestrian navigation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Mobile HCI '10), 341--344. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Z Saltz. 2001. Live Media : Interactive Technology and Theatre. Theatre Topics 11, 2, 107--130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying Open to Interpretation : Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation. Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, 99--108. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adam Spiers, Janet van der Linden, Maria Oshodi, Sarah Wiseman, and Aaron M Dollar. 2015. Flatland : an immersive theatre experience centered on shape changing haptic navigation technology Conference Item. IEEE World Haptics Conference 2015.Google Scholar
- Gareth White. 2012. On Immersive Theatre. Theatre Research International 37, 3, 221--235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Doug Williams, Ian Kegel, Marian Ursu, et al. 2015. A Distributed Theatre Experiment with Shakespeare. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia., 281--290. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scooter Willis and Sumi Helal. 2005. RFID information grid for blind navigation and wayfinding. Proceedings of International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '05), 34--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Massimo Zancanaro, Elena Not, Daniela Petrelli, et al. 2015. Recipes for tangible and embodied visit experiences. Proceedings of Museums and the Web (MW2015).Google Scholar
Index Terms
Control and Being Controlled: Exploring the use of Technology in an Immersive Theatre Performance
Recommendations
Haptic reassurance in the pitch black for an immersive theatre experience
UbiComp '11: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computingAn immersive theatre experience was designed to raise awareness and question perceptions of 'blindness', through enabling both sighted and blind members to experience a similar reality. A multimodal experience was created, comprising ambient sounds and ...
Analogue and digital immersive experiences: what should digital creators learn from live theatre makers?
EVA '18: Proceedings of the Conference on Electronic Visualisation and the ArtsIn every century, there are different apparatuses that are redefining and refining the notion of immersion. After experiencing panoramas, planetariums or even IMAX movies, we are now longing to see whether VR can really fulfil our expectations. We are ...
Engagement: the inputs and the outputs: conference overview
Inputs-Outputs '13: Proceedings of the 2013 Inputs-Outputs Conference: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Engagement in HCI and PerformanceThe Inputs-Outputs interdisciplinary conference on engagement (and related terms) was structured to cross-fertilise the relevant researchers from the arts, sciences and engineering on the causes, consequences and assessment of engagement. The goal of ...
Comments