Helena Strömberg
Wendy Ju
Nikolas Martelaro
ABSTRACT
Development of autonomous vehicles is progressing. As automation levels increase, the roles of both the driver and the vehicle are changing, meaning that they need to forge a new relationship to each other as the vehicle gains more agency. We believe this requires approaches that address that relationship early in the design process. One such approach is choosing a metaphor as a guiding principle for the interaction to set the preconditions for the relationship. Another approach is early evaluation of designs between system concept prototypes and the user. The aim of this one-day workshop is to explore the use of metaphors and evaluation though enactment in the design of human-vehicle interaction. This will be done through a short concept development process, where participants are asked to reflect on the process. Outcomes will be an evolved understanding of using the design approaches, as well as identified collaboration and research needs.
- Mattias Arvola and Henrik Artman. 2007. Enactments in interaction design: How designers make sketches behave. Artifact 1, 2 (2007), 106-- 119.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Victoria Banks and Neville Stanton 2016. Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future. Applied Ergonomics, 53, Part B, 389--395.Google Scholar
- Scott Davidoff, Min Kyung Lee, Anind K Dey, John Zimmerman. 2007. Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 429--446. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Staffan Davidsson and Håkan Alm. 2009. Applying the "Team Player" Approach on Car Design. In Proceedings of Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: 8th International Conference, EPCE 2009, San Diego, CA, USA, July 19--24, 2009. (pp. 349--357). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frank Flemisch, Catherine Adams, Sheila Conway, Ken Goodrich, Michael Palmer, Paul Schutte. 2003. The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction. NASA Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
- Google. 2015. Google Self-Driving Car Project. Retrieved December 3, 2015, from https://www.google.com/selfdrivingcar/Google Scholar
- Nikhil Gowda, Wendy Ju, Kirstin Kohler. 2014. Dashboard Design for an Autonomous Car. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Seattle, WA, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wendy Ju. 2015. The Design of Implicit Interactions. In Synthesis Lectures on HumanCentered Informatics 8, 2 (2015) 1--93 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob Markussen and Morten Mortensen. 2012. Choosing a personality for your car. In Student Interaction Design Research conference (SIDeR '12), Göteborg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
- Natasha Merat, Jamson Hamish, Frank Lai, Micheal Daly, Oliver Carsten. 2014. Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27: 274-- 282.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ingrid Pettersson and MariAnne Karlsson. 2015. Setting the stage for autonomous cars: a pilot study of future autonomous driving experiences. IET intelligent transport systems 9, 7, 694--701Google Scholar
- Ingrid Pettersson, Annie Rydström, Helena Strömberg, Lena Hylving, Jonas Andersson, Maria Klingegård, Marianne Karlsson. 2016. Living Room on the Move: Autonomous Vehicles and Social Experiences. 9th Nordic Conference on HumanComputer Interaction, NordiCHI 2016, Gothenburg, Sweden, 23--27 October 2016 Vol. 2 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dale Richards and Alex Stedmon. 2016. To delegate or not to delegate: A review of control frameworks for autonomous cars. Applied Ergonomics, 53, Part B, 383--388Google Scholar
- Volvo Cars (2017) Drive Me. Retrieved January 13, 2017. http://www.volvocars.com/intl/about/ourinnovation-brands/intellisafe/autonomousdriving/drive-me/real-lifeGoogle Scholar
- Everett Rogers. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press, Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Adam Waytz, Joy Heafner, Nicholas Epley. 2014. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 52:113--117.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Setting the Stage with Metaphors for Interaction -- Researching Methodological Approaches for Interaction Design of Autonomous Vehicles
Recommendations
HCI and Autonomous Vehicles: Contextual Experience Informs Design
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe interaction between drivers and their cars will change significantly with the introduction of autonomous vehicles. The driver's role will shift towards a supervisory control of their autonomous vehicle. The eventual relief from the driving task ...
Study on mixed traffic of autonomous vehicles and human-driven vehicles with different cyber interaction approaches
AbstractThe emergence of autonomous vehicles will significantly improve traffic efficiency and safety. Before the fully autonomous driving of traffic system, the mixed traffic with autonomous and human-driven vehicles will be a typical feature ...
Evaluating How Interfaces Influence the User Interaction with Fully Autonomous Vehicles
AutomotiveUI '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsWith increasing automation, occupants of fully autonomous vehicles are likely to be completely disengaged from the driving task. However, even with no driving involved, there are still activities that will require interfaces between the vehicle and ...
Comments