skip to main content
10.1145/3064857.3079119acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Exploring the Materials of TUIs: A Multi-Method Approach

Published:10 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we report on the early developments and future plans of a study that aims to shed light on: (1) the material choices designers make when creating tangible user interfaces (TUIs), (2) how people characterise these materials, and (3) how these materials affect the way we experience TUIs. To achieve these goals we designed a study that involves a number of phases and methods, including surveying the range of materials used in TUIs, gathering accounts of how people characterise a selection of these materials and finally evaluating a wider range of materials based on these established characteristics. In the following we present our research approach and discuss the methodologies we will use throughout this study. We conclude by presenting our vision on how these phases will culminate in a better understanding of the material choices of TUIs and how this can be used to inform future designs. Finally, we present this work-in-progress to expose our methodological decisions to the wider DIS community, as we anticipate and welcome expert opinion and feedback on our approach and vision we have for this study.

References

  1. Stuart Cunningham (2010). Applying personal construct psychology in sound design using a repertory grid. In Proceedings of the 5th Audio Mostly Conference on A Conference on Interaction with Sound (AM '10). ACM. 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tanja Döring, Axel Sylvester and Albrecht Schmidt (2012). Exploring material-centered design concepts for tangible interaction. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (CHI EA '12). 1523. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mark Easterby-Smith (1980). The design, analysis and interpretation of repertory grids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 13, 3--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Daniel Fallman and John Waterworth. Capturing User Experiences of Mobile Information Technology with the Repertory Grid Technique. In Human Technology Vol. 6, No. 2 (2010). 250--268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. InForm: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 417--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Marc Hassenzahl and Tibor Trautmann (2001). Analysis of web sites with the repertory grid technique. In CHI '01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '01). ACM. 167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Trevor Hogan and Eva Hornecker (2013). Blending the repertory grid technique with focus groups to reveal rich design relevant insight. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI '13). ACM. 116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Trevor Hogan and Eva Hornecker. (2013). In touch with space: embodying live data for tangible interaction. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '13). ACM. 275 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur (2006). Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (CHI '06). ACM. 437 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hiroshi Ishii (2008). Tangible bits. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (TEI '08). ACM. 15--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Heekyoung Jung and Erik Stolterman (2011). Material probe: exploring materiality of digital artifacts. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction (TEI '11). ACM. 153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hyosun Kwon, Seok-Hyung Bae, Hwan Kim and Woohun Lee (2012). Inflated roly-poly. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '12). ACM. 189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jarmo Laaksolahti, Jakob Tholander, Marcus Lundén, Jorsi Solsona Belenguer, Anna Karlsson and Tove Jaensson (2011). The Lega: A Device for Leaving and Finding Tactile Traces. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction (TEI '11). ACM. 193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Christopher Kopic and Kristian Gohlke (2016). InflatiBits - A Modular Soft Robotic Construction Kit for Children. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM. 723-- 728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ken Nakagaki, Pasquale Totaro, Jim Peraino, Thariq Shihipar, Chantine Akiyama, Yin Shuang, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2016. HydroMorph: Shape Changing Water Membrane for Display and Interaction. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 512--517 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Laura Perovich, Philippa Mothersill and Jennifer Broutin Farah (2013). Awakened Apparel: Embedded Soft Actuators for Expressive Fashion and Functional Garments. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '14). ACM. 77--80 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Daniela Petrelli, Alessandro Soranzo, Luigina Ciolfi, and John Reidy (2016). Exploring the Aesthetics of Tangible Interaction. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM. 100--108 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Joan Sol Roo, Renaud Gervais and Martin Hachet (2016). Inner Garden: an Augmented Sandbox Designed for Self-Reflection. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM. 570--576. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Boris de Ruyter and Emile Aarts (2004). Ambient Intelligence: visualizing the future. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, 203--208 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Munehiko Sato, Ivan Poupyrev and Chris Harrison (2012). Touché: Enhancing Touch Interaction on Humans, Screens, Liquids, and Everyday Objects. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12) ACM. 483. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Magdalena Schmid, Sonja Rümelin, and Hendrik Richter (2013). Empowering materiality: inspiring the design of tangible interactions. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '13). ACM. 91--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mildred L. G. Shaw (1980). On Becoming a Personal Scientist: interactive computer elicitation of personal models of the world. (B. R. Gaines, Ed.). London: Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jakob Tholander, Maria Normark and Chiara Rossitto (2012). Understanding agency in interaction design materials. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM. 2499--2508. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rohan S. Vijay and Sidhant Goyal (2016). MagnetoWear: A Magnetic Wearable Device to Interact With the Smartphone to Perform Personalized Actions. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM. 597--602. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Materials of TUIs: A Multi-Method Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '17 Companion: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems
      June 2017
      424 pages
      ISBN:9781450349918
      DOI:10.1145/3064857

      Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 June 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '17 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader