skip to main content
10.1145/3067695.3082531acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparison of illumination algorithms in unbounded spaces

Published:15 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Illumination algorithms are a new class of evolutionary algorithms capable of producing large archives of diverse and high-performing solutions. Examples of such algorithms include Novelty Search with Local Competition (NSLC), the Multi-dimensional Archive of Phenotypic Elites (MAP-Elites) and the newly introduced Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) MAP-Elites. While NSLC can be used in unbounded behavioral spaces, MAP-Elites and CVT-MAP-Elites require the user to manually specify the bounds. In this study, we introduce variants of these algorithms that expand their bounds based on the discovered solutions. In addition, we introduce a novel algorithm called "Cluster-Elites" that can adapt its bounds to non-convex spaces. We compare all algorithms in a maze navigation problem and illustrate that Cluster-Elites and the expansive variants of MAP-Elites and CVT-MAP-Elites have comparable or better performance than NSLC, MAP-Elites and CVT-MAP-Elites.

References

  1. A. Cully, J. Clune, D. Tarapore, and J.-B. Mouret. 2015. Robots that can adapt like animals. Nature 521, 7553 (2015), 503--507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Herbert Edelsbrunner, David Kirkpatrick, and Raimund Seidel. 1983. On the shape of a set of points in the plane. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 29, 4 (1983), 551--559. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Leonard Kauffman and Peter J. Rousseeuw. 1987. Clustering by means of Medoids. In Statistical Data Analysis Based on the L1 -Norm and Related Methods, Y. Dodge (Ed.). North-Holland, 405--416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley. 2008. Exploiting Open-Endedness to Solve Problems Through the Search for Novelty. In ALIFE. 329--336.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Lehman and K. O Stanley. 2011. Abandoning objectives: Evolution through the search for novelty alone. Evol. Comp. 19 (2011), 189--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley. 2011. Evolving a Diversity of Virtual Creatures Through Novelty Search and Local Competition. In GECCO '11. ACM, 211--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Lewitus and H. Morlon. 2016. Natural constraints to species diversification. PLoS Biol 14, 8 (2016), e1002532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J.-B. Mouret. 2011. Novelty-based multiobjectivization. In New Horizons in Evolutionary Robotics. Springer, 139--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J.-B. Mouret and J. Clune. 2015. Illuminating search spaces by mapping elites. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.04909 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. K. Pugh, L. B. Soros, and K. O. Stanley. 2016. Quality Diversity: A New Frontier for Evolutionary Computation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016), 40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. L. Trujillo, G. Olague, E. Lutton, and F. F. De Vega. 2008. Discovering several robot behaviors through speciation. In Workshops on Applications of Evolutionary Computation. Springer, 164--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. V. Vassiliades, K. Chatzilygeroudis, and J.-B. Mouret. 2016. Scaling Up MAP-Elites Using Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05729 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A comparison of illumination algorithms in unbounded spaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '17: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
      July 2017
      1934 pages
      ISBN:9781450349390
      DOI:10.1145/3067695

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 July 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader