skip to main content
10.1145/3071178.3071312acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conversion rate optimization through evolutionary computation

Published:01 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Conversion optimization means designing a web interface so that as many users as possible take a desired action on it, such as register or purchase. Such design is usually done by hand, testing one change at a time through A/B testing, or a limited number of combinations through multivariate testing, making it possible to evaluate only a small fraction of designs in a vast design space. This paper describes Sentient Ascend, an automatic conversion optimization system that uses evolutionary optimization to create effective web interface designs. Ascend makes it possible to discover and utilize interactions between the design elements that are difficult to identify otherwise. Moreover, evaluation of design candidates is done in parallel online, i.e. with a large number of real users interacting with the system. A case study on an existing media site shows that significant improvements (i.e. over 43%) are possible beyond human design. Ascend can therefore be seen as an approach to massively multivariate conversion optimization, based on a massively parallel interactive evolution.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Tim Ash, Rich Page, and Maura Ginty. 2012. Landing Page Optimization: The Definitie Guide to Testing and Tuning for Conversions (second ed.). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Daren C. Brabham. 2013. Crowdsourcing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jürgen Branke. 2002. Evolutionary Optimization in Dynamic Environments. Springer, Berlin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Builtwith. 2017. A/B Testing Usage. (2017). https://trends.builtwith.com/analytics/a-b-testing Retrieved 1/9/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. eMarketer. 2016. US Digital Ad Spending to Surpass TV this Year. (2016). https://www.emarketer.com/Article/US-Digital-Ad-Spending-Surpass-TV-this-Year/1014469 Retrieved 2/1/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dario Floreano, Peter Dürr, and Claudio Mattiussi. 2008. Neuroevolution: From Architectures to Learning. Evolutionary Intelligence 1 (2008), 47--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Babak Hodjat and Hormoz Shahrzad. 2013. Introducing an Age-Varying Fitness Estimation Function. In Genetic Programming Theory and Practice X, Rick Riolo, Ekaterina Vladislavleva, Marylyn D Ritchie, and Jason H. Moore (Eds.). Springer, New York, 59--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ron Kohavi and Roger Longbotham. 2016. Online Controlled Experiments and A/B Tests. In Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining, Claude Sammut and Geoffrey I. Webb (Eds.). Springer, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Joel Lehman and Risto Miikkulainen. 2013. Boosting Interactive Evolution using Human Computation Markets. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Theory and Practice of Natural Computation. Springer, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Joel Lehman and Risto Miikkulainen. 2013. Neuroevolution. Scholarpedia 8, 6 (2013), 30977. http://nn.cs.utexas.edu/?lehman:scholarpedia13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Khalid Salehd and Ayat Shukairy. 2011. Conversion Optimization: The Art and Science of Converting Prospects to Customers. O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jimmy Secretan, Nicholas Beato, David B. D'Ambrosio, Adelein Rodriguez, Adam Campbell, J. T. Folsom-Kovarik, and Kenneth O. Stanley. 2011. Picbreeder: A Case Study in Collaborative Evolutionary Exploration of Design Space. Evolutionary Computation 19 (2011), 345--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sentient Technologies 2017. It's not A/B, I's AI. (2017). http://www.sentient.ai/ascend Retrieved 1/9/2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hormoz Shahrzad, Babak Hodjat, and Risto Miikkulainen. 2016. Estimating the Advantage of Age-Layering in Evolutionary Algorithms. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Takagi. 2001. Interactive Evolutionary Computation: Fusion of the Capacities of EC Optimization and Human Evaluation. Proc. IEEE 89, 9 (2001), 1275--1296. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/5/20546/00949485.pdf?tp=&arnumber=949485&isnumber=20546Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Daniel Yankelovich and David Meer. 2006. Rediscovering Market Segmentation. Harvard Business Review 84, 2 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Conversion rate optimization through evolutionary computation

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            GECCO '17: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
            July 2017
            1427 pages
            ISBN:9781450349208
            DOI:10.1145/3071178

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            GECCO '17 Paper Acceptance Rate178of462submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

            Upcoming Conference

            GECCO '24
            Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
            July 14 - 18, 2024
            Melbourne , VIC , Australia

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader