skip to main content
10.1145/307418.307524acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdateConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

On the design of self-checking functional units based on Shannon circuits

Published:01 January 1999Publication History
First page image

References

  1. {1} D. A. Anderson and G. Metze. Design of Totally Self-Checking Circuits for m-out-of-n Codes. IEEE Trans. on Computers, C-22:263-269, Mar. 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. {2} C. Bolchini, F. Salice, and D. Sciuto. Designing networks with error detectio properties through the fault error relation. In Symp. on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, pages 290-297, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. {3} C. Bolchini, F. Salice, and D. Sciuto. A novel methodology for designing TSC combinational networks based on the parity bit code. In Proc. of IEEE Eur. Design and Test Conf., pages 440-444, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. {4} R. E. Bryant. Graph-based algorithms for boolean function manipulation. IEEE Trans. on Computers, C35: 677-691, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. {5} P. Buch, A. Narayan, A. Newton, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. Logic synthesis for large pass transistor circuits. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. On Computer Aided Design , pages 663-670, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. {6} F. Busaba and P. Lala. Self-checking combinational circuit design for single and unidirectional multibit error. J. of Electronic Testing Theory and Applic., (5):19-28, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. {7} B. R. C. Metra, M. Favalli. Signal coding technique and CMOS gates for strongly fault-secure combinational functional blocks. In IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, pages 174-182, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. {8} W. C. Carter and P. R. Schneider. Design of dynamically checked computers. In Proc. IFIP '68, Edinburgh, Scotland, pages 878-883, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. {9} K. De, C. Natarajan, D. Nair, and P. Banerjee. RSYN: asystem for automated synthesis of reliable multilevel circuits. IEEE Trans. on VLSI, 2(2):186-195, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. {10} M. Diaz, P. Azema, and J. M. Ayache. Unified Design of Self-Checking and Fail-Safe Combinational Circuits and Sequential Machines. IEEE Trans. Comput., C-28:276-281, March 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. {11} F. Salice, M. Sami and D. Sciuto, Synthesis of multi-level self-checking logic. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Work. on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, pages 115-123, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. {12} M. Favalli, B. Riccò, and L. Penza. A novel DFT technique for critical bridging faults in CMOS and BiCMOS ICs. In IEEE European Design and Test Conference, pages 568- 572, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. {13} N. K. Jha and S.-J. Wang. Design and Synthesis of Self-Checking VLSI Circuits. IEEE Trans. on CAD, 12:878- 887, June 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. {14} K. Konishi and et al. A logic synthesis system for the pass-transistor logic SPL. In SASIMI, pages 32-39, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. {15} R. Lisanke. Logic synthesis and optimization benchmarks user guide v. 2.0 - technical report. Microelectronics Center of North Carolina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. {16} J.-C. Lo, J. C. Daly, and M. Nicolaidis. Design of Static CMOS Self-Checking Circuits using Built-In Current Sensing. In Proc. of Int. Symp. Fault-Tolerant Comput., pages 104-111, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. {17} W. Maly. Realistic Fault Modeling for VLSI Testing. In Proc. of Design Automation Conf., pages 173-180, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. {18} C. Metra, M. Favalli, P. Olivo, and B. Riccò. On-Line Detection of Bridging and Delay Faults in Functional Blocks of CMOS Self-Checking Circuits. IEEE Trans. on CAD, 16(7):770-776, July 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. {19} T. Nanya and M. Uchida. The Design of Strongly Fault-Secure and Strongly Code-Disjoint Combinational Circuits. In Proc. of Joint Fault-Tolerant Computing Symposium, pages 245-250, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. {20} M. Nicolaidis. Fail-safe interfaces for VLSI: theoretical foundations and implementation. IEEE Trans. on Computers , 47(1):62-77, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. {21} V. Saposhnikov et al. Self-dual parity checking - a new method for on-line testing. In Proc. of IEEE VLSI Test Symp., pages 162-168, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. {22} D. Siewiorek. Architecture of fault-tolerant computers: An historical perspective. Proc. of the IEEE, 79(12):1710- 1734, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. {23} J. E. Smith and G. Metze. Strongly Fault Secure Logic Networks. IEEE Trans. on Computers, C-27:491-499, June 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. {24} J. Sousa, F. Goncalves, and J. Teixeira. IC defect based testability analysis. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Test Conf., pages 500- 509, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. {25} M. Tachibana. Heuristic algorithms for FBDD node minimization with application to pass-transistor-logic and DCVS synthesis. In SASIMI, pages 96-101, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. {26} N. A. Touba and E. J. McCluskey. Logic synthesis techniques for reduced area implementation of multilevel circuits with concurrent error detection. In Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. On Computer Aided Design, pages 651-654, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the design of self-checking functional units based on Shannon circuits

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DATE '99: Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe
          January 1999
          730 pages
          ISBN:1581131216
          DOI:10.1145/307418

          Copyright © 1999 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 January 1999

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate518of1,794submissions,29%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader