skip to main content
10.1145/3077136.3080769acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-site User Behavior Modeling and Its Application in Video Recommendation

Published:07 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

As online video service continues to grow in popularity, video content providers compete hard for more eyeball engagement. Some users visit multiple video sites to enjoy videos of their interest while some visit exclusively one site. However, due to the isolation of data, mining and exploiting user behaviors in multiple video websites remain unexplored so far. In this work, we try to model user preferences in six popular video websites with user viewing records obtained from a large ISP in China. The empirical study shows that users exhibit both consistent cross-site interests as well as site-specific interests. To represent this dichotomous pattern of user preferences, we propose a generative model of Multi-site Probabilistic Factorization (MPF) to capture both the cross-site as well as site-specific preferences. Besides, we discuss the design principle of our model by analyzing the sources of the observed site-specific user preferences, namely, site peculiarity and data sparsity. Through conducting extensive recommendation validation, we show that our MPF model achieves the best results compared to several other state-of-the-art factorization models with significant improvements of F-measure by 12.96%, 8.24% and 6.88%, respectively. Our findings provide insights on the value of integrating user data from multiple sites, which stimulates collaboration between video service providers.

References

  1. Herve Abdi. 2007. Multiple correlation coefficient. The University of Texas at Dallas (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nicola Barbieri and Giuseppe Manco 2011. An analysis of probabilistic methods for top-n recommendation in collaborative filtering Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 172--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Haolan Chen, Di Niu, Kunfeng Lai, Yu Xu, and Masoud Ardakani. 2016. Separating-Plane Factorization Models: Scalable Recommendation from One-Class Implicit Feedback Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 669--678.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Paolo Cremonesi, Yehuda Koren, and Roberto Turrin. 2010. Performance of recommender algorithms on top-n recommendation tasks Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 39--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wenyuan Dai, Qiang Yang, Gui-Rong Xue, and Yong Yu. 2007. Boosting for transfer learning. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning. ACM, 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Theodoros Evgeniou and Massimiliano Pontil. 2004. Regularized multi--task learning. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 109--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ignacio Fernández-Tobías, Iván Cantador, Marius Kaminskas, and Francesco Ricci. 2012. Cross-domain recommender systems: A survey of the state of the art Spanish Conference on Information Retrieval.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 263--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietmar Jannach, Markus Zanker, Alexander Felfernig, and Gerhard Friedrich 2010. Recommender systems: an introduction. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bhargav Kanagal, Amr Ahmed, Sandeep Pandey, Vanja Josifovski, Lluis Garcia-Pueyo, and Jeff Yuan. 2013. Focused matrix factorization for audience selection in display advertising Data Engineering (ICDE), 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on. IEEE, 386--397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bin Li, Qiang Yang, and Xiangyang Xue 2009. Can Movies and Books Collaborate? Cross-Domain Collaborative Filtering for Sparsity Reduction. IJCAI, Vol. Vol. 9. 2052--2057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bin Li, Qiang Yang, and Xiangyang Xue 2009. Transfer learning for collaborative filtering via a rating-matrix generative model Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. ACM, 617--624.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawen Liang, Jaan Altosaar, Laurent Charlin, and David M Blei. 2016. Factorization Meets the Item Embedding: Regularizing Matrix Factorization with Item Co-occurrence. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 59--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jerome L Myers, Arnold Well, and Robert Frederick Lorch. 2010. Research design and statistical analysis. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vito Claudio Ostuni, Tommaso Di Noia, Eugenio Di Sciascio, and Roberto Mirizzi. 2013. Top-n recommendations from implicit feedback leveraging linked open data Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 85--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rong Pan, Yunhong Zhou, Bin Cao, Nathan N Liu, Rajan Lukose, Martin Scholz, and Qiang Yang. 2008. One-class collaborative filtering. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 502--511. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Weike Pan. 2016. A survey of transfer learning for collaborative recommendation with auxiliary data. Neurocomputing Vol. 177 (2016), 447--453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Weike Pan, Nathan N Liu, Evan W Xiang, and Qiang Yang. 2011. Transfer learning to predict missing ratings via heterogeneous user feedbacks IJCAI Proceedings-International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. Vol. 22. 2318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Weike Pan, Evan Wei Xiang, Nathan Nan Liu, and Qiang Yang. 2010. Transfer Learning in Collaborative Filtering for Sparsity Reduction. AAAI, Vol. Vol. 10. 230--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback Proceedings of the twenty-fifth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. AUAI Press, 452--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ruslan Salakhutdinov and Andriy Mnih. 2011. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In NIPS, Vol. Vol. 20. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ajit P Singh and Geoffrey J Gordon. 2008. Relational learning via collective matrix factorization Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 650--658.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Quan Yuan, Li Chen, and Shiwan Zhao. 2011. Factorization vs. regularization: fusing heterogeneous social relationships in top-n recommendation. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 245--252. endthebibliographyGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multi-site User Behavior Modeling and Its Application in Video Recommendation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGIR '17: Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
          August 2017
          1476 pages
          ISBN:9781450350228
          DOI:10.1145/3077136

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 August 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGIR '17 Paper Acceptance Rate78of362submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader