skip to main content
10.1145/3077839.3077854acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Qantifying The Impact of Electric Vehicles On The Electric Grid: A Simulation Based Case-Study

Published:16 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) increases, it is important to reliably characterize their recharging load on the electrical grid. Because the last-mile of the electrical grid was never envisioned for EV usage, we need to identify and localize demand-side hot spots due to EV charging. Also, it would be worthwhile to see how the EVs can be utilized for the benefit of the grid on activities such as peak reduction and ability to sustain local micro-grids. Quantifying the impacts of EVs on the grid requires an understanding of the spatio-temporal distribution of EVs in a city and the consumption patterns of the EV batteries. These, in turn, depend on the traffic load on the transport grid. In this paper, we attempt to understand these impacts of EV by creating a model of a popular EV (Tesla Model S) and integrating it with SUMO, a broad-based micro traffic simulator. Using this setup, we obtain the EV load on the distribution side of an electrical grid for a real-world traffic pattern dataset from the city of Luxembourg. We find that: (i) The city's aggregate peak demand can be managed within existing levels even when 25% of vehicles become electric. (ii) However, EV charging does overwhelm the distribution network creating hot spots and these hot spots can be clustered together spatially necessitating additional upstream investments. (iii) When EVs feed power back to the grid, simple algorithms can achieve reasonable aggregate peak shaving (≈7%) under low EV penetration levels. For higher EV penetration levels, sophisticated EV coordination algorithms are needed. (iv) Under a penetration level of 25%, EVs can potentially sustain micro-grids that serve the entire base load of 13% of the population for a duration of up to 30 minutes.

References

  1. 2015. 30-minute power cut hits right across Luxembourg. (Sept 2015). http://www.wort.lu/en/luxembourg/sunday-morning-30-minute-power-cut-hits-right-across-luxembourg-55feac6e0c88b46a8ce607e7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2015. Annual Report 2015 - Creos Luxembourg SA. (2015). http://www.creos-net.lu/fileadmin/dokumente/downloads/rapport_annuels/pdf/gb_creos_annual_report_2015.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2016. Battery Pack - Tesla Motors Wiki. (2016). http://www.teslamotors.wiki/wiki/Battery_Pack?wb48617274=8B075FDDGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2016. Tesla Model S. (2016). https://www.teslamotors.com/modelsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2017. Electric Vehicle Power Meters. (2017). http://www.evelectricity.com/evmeters/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2017. The Official Portal of The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. (2017). http://www.luxembourg.public.lu/en/le-grand-duche-se-presente/luxembourg-tour-horizon/population-et-multiculturaliteGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2017. STATEC. (2017). https://www.statistiques.public.luGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. O. Ardakanian, C. Rosenberg, and S. Keshav. 2013. Distributed Control of Electric Vehicle Charging. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Future Energy Systems (e-Energy '13). ACM, 101--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Bosovic, M. Music, and S. Sadovic. 2015. Analysis of the impacts of plug-in electric vehicle charging on the part of a real low voltage distribution network. In Proceedings of PowerTech Eindhoven. IEEE, 1--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K. Clement-Nyns, E. Haesen, and J. Driesen. 2010. The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 25, 1 (Feb 2010), 371--380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lara Codeca, Raphael Frank, and Thomas Engel. 2015. LuST: a 24-hour scenario of Luxembourg city for SUMO traffic simulations. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Ersal, C. Ahn, I. A. Hiskens, H. Peng, and J. L. Stein. 2011. Impact of controlled plug-in EVs on microgrids: A military microgrid example. In 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2011.6039620Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L. Jia, Z. Hu, Y. Song, and Z. Luo. 2012. Optimal siting and sizing of electric vehicle charging stations. In IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference (IEVC). 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Jun and A. J. Markel. 2012. Simulation and analysis of vehicle-to-Grid operations in microgrid. In 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2012.6345589Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniel Krajzewicz, Jakob Erdmann, Michael Behrisch, and Laura Bieker. 2012. Recent Development and Applications of SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility. International Journal On Advances in Systems and Measurements 5, 3&4 (December 2012), 128--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hao Liang and Weihua Zhuang. 2014. Stochastic Modeling and Optimization in a Microgrid: A Survey. Energies 7, 4 (2014), 2027--2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7042027 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. R. Maia, M. Silva, R. Araujo, and U. Nunes. 2011. Electric vehicle simulator for energy consumption studies in electric mobility systems. In Integrated and Sustainable Transportation System (FISTS). IEEE, 227--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Elon Musk and JB Straubel. 2012. Model S Efficiency and Range. (2012). https://www.teslamotors.com/blog/model-s-efficiency-and-rangeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. European Alternative Fuels Observatory. 2016. Luxembourg. (2016). http://www.eafo.eu/content/luxembourgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. U.S Department of Energy. 2017. Detailed Test Information. (2017). https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Panasonic. 2016. Panasonic NCR 18650B. (2016). https://na.industrial.panasonic.com/products/batteries/rechargeable-batteries/lithium-ion/series/cylindrical-series/CS474?reset=1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. P. Papadopoulos, S. Skarvelis-Kazakos, I. Grau, L. M. Cipcigan, and N. Jenkins. 2012. Electric vehicles' impact on British distribution networks. Electrical Systems in Transportation 2, 3 (2012), 91--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. G.A. Putrus, P. Suwanapingkarl, D. Johnston, E.C. Bentley, and M. Narayana. 2009. Impact of electric vehicles on power distribution networks. In Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 2009. VPPC '09. IEEE. 827--831. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kejun Qian, Chengke Zhou, M. Allan, and Yue Yuan. 2011. Modeling of Load Demand Due to EV Battery Charging in Distribution Systems. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 26, 2 (may 2011), 802--810. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2057456Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Qian, C. Zhou, M. Allan, and Y. Yuan. 2011. Modeling of Load Demand Due to EV Battery Charging in Distribution Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 26, 2 (2011), 802--810. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. P. Richardson, D. Flynn, and A. Keane. 2010. Impact assessment of varying penetrations of electric vehicles on low voltage distribution systems. In Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2010 IEEE. 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. P. Richardson, D. Flynn, and A. Keane. 2012. Local versus centralized charging strategies for electric vehicles in low voltage distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 3, 2 (2012), 1020--1028. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jose Rivera, Christoph Goebel, and Hans-Arno Jacobsen. 2015. A Distributed Anytime Algorithm for Real-Time EV Charging Congestion Control. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Sixth International Conference on Future Energy Systems (e-Energy '15). ACM, 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Matthew J Rutherford and Vahid Yousefzadeh. 2011. The impact of electric vehicle battery charging on distribution transformers. In Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), 2011 Twenty-Sixth Annual IEEE. IEEE, 396--400. 00045.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. W. Saad, Z. Han, H. V. Poor, and T. Basar. 2012. Game-Theoretic Methods for the Smart Grid: An Overview of Microgrid Systems, Demand-Side Management, and Smart Grid Communications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 29, 5 (Sep 2012), 86--105. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.2186410 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. JB Straubel. 2014. Driving Range for the Model S Family. (Dec. 2014). https://www.teslamotors.com/blog/driving-range-model-s-familyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Taylor, A. Maitra, M. Alexander, D. Brooks, and M. Duvall. 2009. Evaluation of the impact of plug-in electric vehicle loading on distribution system operations. In Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2010 IEEE. 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jian Xiong. 2014. Impact Assessment of Electric Vehicle Charging on Power Distribution Systems. Master's thesis. Carleton University, Ottawa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    e-Energy '17: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Future Energy Systems
    May 2017
    388 pages
    ISBN:9781450350365
    DOI:10.1145/3077839

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

    Upcoming Conference

    E-Energy '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader