skip to main content
10.1145/3078810.3078816acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesperdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

P+: a test fit platform for generative design of 3D media architecture

Published:07 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

As media architecture becomes an increasingly popular vehicle for the integration of digital technologies into the built environment, a combination of techniques becomes necessary to overcome challenges regarding prototyping form, content and scale. In this paper, we present P+, an open-sourced test fit generative platform for the design of 3D media façades. It consists of modular light cell components that can be assembled into a larger structure; a physical, 3D printing based prototyping kit; and a software tool for generation, testing and live running of façades fulfilling pre-defined contextual constraints.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a15-hoggenmueller.mp4

mp4

26.5 MB

References

  1. Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. Experience Prototyping. 2000. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS'00). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mario Carpo. 2012. The Digital Turn in Architecture 1992 -- 2012. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Angie Chandler, Joe Finney, Carl Lewis and Alan Dix. 2009. Toward emergent technology for blended public displays. In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'09). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2010. Designing Urban Media Façades: Cases and Challenges. In Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Peter Dalsgaard, Kim Halskov and Alexander Wiethoff. Designing Media Architecture: Tools and Approaches for Addressing the Main Design Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'16). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Patrick Tobias Fischer and Eva Hornecker. 2012. Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sven Gehring, Elias Hartz, Markus Löchtefeld and Antonio Krüger. 2013. The media façade toolkit: prototyping and simulating interaction with media façades. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '13). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kim Halskov and Tobias Ebsen. 2013. A framework for designing complex media facades. Design Studies 34(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Hank Haeusler. Media Façades: History, Technology, Content. 2009. avedition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Luke Hespanhol, Martin Tomitsch, Ian McArthur, Joel Fredericks, Ronald Schroeter and Marcus Foth. 2015. Vote As You Go: Blending Interfaces For Community Engagement Into The Urban Space. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Community & Technologies (C&T'15). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Luke Hespanhol and Peter Dalsgaard. 2015. Social Interaction Design Patterns For Urban Media Architecture. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'15).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Luke Hespanhol and Martin Tomitsch. 2015. Strategies for intuitive interaction in public urban spaces. Interacting with Computers: iwu051.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Marius Hoggenmueller and Alexander Wiethoff. 2014. LightSet: enabling urban prototyping of interactive media façades. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Marius Hoggenmueller and Alexander Wiethoff. 2015. Blinking Lights and Other Revelations: Experiences Designing Hybrid Media Façades. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis'15). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Marius Hoggenmueller and Alexander Wiethoff. 2016. LightBricks: a physical prototyping toolkit for do-it-yourself media architecture. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Media Architecture Biennale (MAB'16). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Andrew Vande Moere and Niels Woulters. 2012. The Role of Context in Media Architecture. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis 2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Susa Pop, Tanya Toft, Nerea Calvillo, Mark Wright. (2016). What Urban Media Art Can Do - Why, When, Where and How. avedition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rowe, Anthony. 2012. Within an Ocean of Light: Creating Volumetric Lightscapes. In Leonardo, Vol. 45, No. 4. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Susanne Seitinger, Daniel S. Perry and William J. Mitchell. 2009. Urban pixels: painting the city with light. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mirjam Struppek. 2006. The social potential of urban screens. Visual Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin Tomitsch. 2017. City Apps as Urban Interfaces. In Media Architecture - Using Information and Media as Construction Material, Alexander Wiethoff and Heinrich Hussmann. De Gruyter Publishers, Berlin, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Martijn de Wall. 2014. The City As Interface - How New Media Are Changing the City. nai010 publishersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Alexander Wiethoff and Magdalena Blöckner. 2011. Lightbox - Exploring Interaction Modalities with Colored Light. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied Interaction (TEI'11). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Alexander Wiethoff and Sven Gehring. 2012. Designing interaction with media façades: A case study. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS'12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. P+: a test fit platform for generative design of 3D media architecture

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          PerDis '17: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
          June 2017
          186 pages
          ISBN:9781450350457
          DOI:10.1145/3078810
          • General Chair:
          • Marc Langheinrich,
          • Program Chair:
          • Sarah Clinch

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 June 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • extended-abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          PerDis '17 Paper Acceptance Rate21of38submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate213of384submissions,55%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader