skip to main content
10.1145/3083671.3083688acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design for Existential Crisis in the Anthropocene Age

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

What should be our orientation to the socio-technical as climate predictions worsen; ecological crises and wars escalate mass migration and refugee numbers; right-wing populism sweeps through politics; automation threatens workers' jobs and austerity policies destabilize society? What is to be done when it is not "business as usual" and even broken concepts of progress seem no longer to be progressing? We ask how to design for the common good, focusing on human needs for meaning, fulfillment, dignity and decency, qualities which technology struggles to support but can easily undermine. We juxtapose the design of computing that offers hope with that which offers only distraction, propose four modes to design for (being attentive, critical, different and in it together) and conclude with a plea to avoid tools that encourage a blinkered existence at a time of great uncertainty and change.

References

  1. Aoki, P.M., Honicky, R.J., Mainwaring, A., Myers, C., Paulos, E., Subramanian, S., and Woodruff, A. 2009. A vehicle for research: using street sweepers to explore the landscape of environmental community action. Proc CHI '09. ACM, 375--384 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mike Anusas and Rachel Harkness. 2016. Different Presents in the Making, in Design Anthropological Futures. Bloomsbury, 55--70Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hannah Arendt. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, Harmondsworth: Penguin BooksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Aristotle (transl. Martin Oswald). 1962. The Nichomachean Ethics, New York: The Bobs-Merrill CompanyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zygmunt Bauman. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Cornell University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jane Bennett. 2001. The Enchantment of Modern Life. Princeton University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, Pelle. and Hillgren, Per-Anders. 2012. Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign, 8 (2-3). 127--144Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Alan Borning and Michael Muller. 2012. Next steps for Value Sensitive Design. CHI'12, 1125--1134 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jed R. Brubaker and Vanessa Callison-Burch. 2016. Legacy Contact: Designing and Implementing Post-mortem Stewardship at Facebook. Proc. CHI'16, 2908--2919. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Judith P. Butler. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rafael Calvo and Dorian Peters. 2014. Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Aylin Caliskan, Joanna J. Bryson, and Arvind Narayanan. 2017. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science 356 (6334), 183--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Adriana Cavarero (transl. William McCuaig). 2008. Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence. Columbia University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, Julie 2012. Configuring the networked self: Law, code, and the play of everyday practice. Yale University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ciro Conversano, Alessandro Rotondo, Elena Lensi, Della Vista O, Arpone F, Reda MA. Optimism and Its Impact on Mental and Physical Well-Being. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 6, 25--29Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial Design. MIT Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Carl DiSalvo, Marti Louw, David Holstius, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Ayca Akin. 2012. Toward a Public Rhetoric Through Participatory Design: Critical Engagements and Creative Expression in the Neighborhood Networks Project. Design Issues. 28 (3): 48--61Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the Landscape of Sustainable HCI. CHI'10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Katie Derthick. 2014. Exploring meditation and technology to problematize the use-or-non-use binary, Refusing, Limiting, Departing-Workshop, CHI'14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16), 656--671. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michaeleen Doucleff. 2016. Anthrax Outbreak In Russia Thought To Be Result Of Thawing Permafrost, NPR, August 3, 2016. (Retrieved January 8, 2017 from http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2016/08/03/488400947/anthrax-outbreak-in-russia-thought-to-be-result-of-thawing-permafrostGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. Proc of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. The Economist, 30 April 2016. The saddest trend: http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21697852-suicide-rates-are-rising-america-and-other-rich-countries-saddest-trendGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Viktor Emil Frankl. 1997. Man's Search for Ultimate Meaning Perseus Book Publishing, New York, 1997; ISBN 0-306-45620-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Viktor Emil Frankl. 2006/1946. Man's Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy, Beacon Press, Boston, MA. ISBN 978-0-8070-1427-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Friedman, Batya. 1996. Value-sensitive design. interactions 3(6) 16--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Batya Friedman, Lisa P. Nathan, Daisy Yoo. 2016. Multi-Lifespan Information System Design in Support of Transitional Justice: Evolving Situated Design Principles for the Long(er) Term. IwC 29 (1): 80--96Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Daniel Goleman. 2009. Ecological Intelligence: How Knowing the Hidden Impacts of What We Buy Can Change Everything. Broadway BusinessGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Erik Grönvall, Lone Malmborg, Jörn Messeter. 2016, Negotiation of values as driver in community-based PD, PDC'16Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yuval Noah Harari. 2016. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Harvill SeckerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Donna J Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3) 575--599Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Donna J Haraway. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin Heidegger. 1983. Being and Time, SCM PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Jose.P. Hourcade, Bullock-Rest, N.E., Jayatilaka, L. and Lisa Nathan. 2012. HCI for Peace: Beyond Tie Dye. interactions, 19(5), 40--47 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Lilly Irani, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Phillp and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development. CHI'10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ole S. Iversen, Kim Halskov and Tuck Wah Leong. 2012. Values-led participatory design. CoDesign, 8(2-3), 87--103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Victor Kaptelinin. 2016. Making the Case for an Existential Perspective in HCI Research on Mortality and Death. alt-chi'16, Proc. EA CHI'16 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Robin W. Kimmerer. 2014: Returning the Gift. Minding Nature 7: http://www.humansandnature.org/filebin/pdf/minding_nature/May2014_Returning_the_Gift.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Stacey Kuznetsov and Eric Paulos. 2010. Participatory sensing in public spaces: activating urban surfaces with sensor probes, DIS'10 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Ray Kurzweil. 2005. The Singularity is Near. New York: Viking Books. ISBN 978-0-670-03384-3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Bruno Latour (transl. Cathy Porter). 2013. An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. James Laidlaw. 2010. Agency and responsibility: Perhaps you can have too much of a good thing. In M. Lambek (Ed) Ordinary ethics: anthropology, language, and action. NY: Fordham University Press, 143--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Ann Light. 2008. Empirical vernacular philosophy, or towards an existential HCI. HCI'08: Workshop on Critical Issues in Interaction Design: https://sites.google.com/site/designcriticism/positionstatementsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Ann Light. 2011. Digital interdependence and how to design for it, interactions, 18 (2), March + April 2011, ACM, New York, NY, USA Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Ann Light. 2011. HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers, Interacting with Computers, 23 (5) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Ann Light. 2014. Foreword in Design for Sharing, Sustainable Society Network+. https://designforsharingdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/design-for-sharing-webversion.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. David Lyon. 2017. Big Data Vulnerabilities: Social Sorting on Steroids? A talk delivered at Vulnerability seminar of Uncertain Archives series. University of Copenhagen, Denmark. April 6, 2017Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Alisdair Macintyre. 2016. Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative. Cambridge: CUP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Clara Mancini. 2011. Animal-Computer Interaction (ACI): a manifesto. Interactions, 18(4) 69--73 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Avishai Margalit. 2009.The decent society. Harvard University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Brent Daniel Mittelstadt, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, Luciano Floridi. 2016. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3 (2)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Timothy Morton. 2010. The Ecological Thought. Harvard University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Leysia Palen and Kenneth M. Anderson. 2016. Crisis informatics - New data for extraordinary times. Science 353.6296, 224--225Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Neil Postman. 2006. Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin BooksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2012. Nothing comes without its world: thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2): 197--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Nithya Sambasivan, Thomas Smyth. 2010. The human infrastructure of ICTD, Proc. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 1--9 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Christine Satchell and Marcus Foth. 2011. Darkness and Disaster in the City. IEEE Internet Computing 15(6), 90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Irina Shklovski, Leysia Palen, and Jeannette Sutton. 2008. Finding community through information and communication technology in disaster response. CSCW'08, 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Elizabeth Shove and G. Walker. 2014. What is energy for? Social Practice and Energy Demand. Theory, Culture and Society. 31 (5), 41--58Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Herbert Simon. 1991. Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning. Organization Science. 2 (1), 125--134 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Judith Simon. 2015. Distributed epistemic responsibility in a hyperconnected era. The Onlife Manifesto. Springer International Publishing, 145--159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Bruce Sterling. 2005. Making Things, MIT PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Bernard Stiegler (transl. Richard Beardsworth and George Collins). 1998. Technics and Time: 1. The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, Stanford University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Reem Talhouk, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Volker Wulf, Clara Crivellaro, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Patrick Olivier. 2016. Refugees and HCI SIG: The Role of HCI in Responding to the Refugee Crisis, Proc. EA CHI'16 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Sharot Tali. 2011. The Optimism Bias. Current Biology, 21 (23), R941--R945Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Anna Tsing. 2012. Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species. Environmental Humanities, 141--154Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Shannon Vallor. 2016. The Case for a Global Technomoral Virtue Ethic. Oxford: OUP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Peter Paul Verbeek. 2011. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, ISBN: 9780226852935Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Leon Watts. 2015. Future Archaeology: Re- animating Innovation in the Mobile Telecoms Industry. In Herman, A.; Hadlaw, J. & Swiss, T., eds., Theories of the Mobile Internet: Materialities and Imaginaries. Routledge. 149--167Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Susan Krauss Whitbourne, Joel R. Sneed and Aline Sayer. 2009. Psychosocial development from college through midlife: A 34-year sequential study. Developmental Psychology, 45 (5), 1328--1340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. World Economic Forum. 2016.The Future of Jobs. http://reports.weforum.org/future-of-jobs-2016/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Fahri Yetim. 2011. Bringing discourse ethics to value sensitive design: pathways toward a deliberative future." AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 3.2, 133--155Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design for Existential Crisis in the Anthropocene Age

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      C&T '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies
      June 2017
      345 pages
      ISBN:9781450348546
      DOI:10.1145/3083671

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      C&T '17 Paper Acceptance Rate34of66submissions,52%Overall Acceptance Rate80of183submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader