skip to main content
10.1145/3083671.3083695acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Design Considerations to Support Nursing Homes' Communities

Published:26 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Caring for institutionalized older adults is known to be a complex issue both for families and professionals. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in this topic primarily due to a growing older population and, hence, a heightened need of research contributions in this area. Previous studies on caregiving for older adults living in nursing homes recognize the necessity to support professionals' work practices to ameliorate their working conditions, and decrease the risk of burnout and job dissatisfaction. In this study, we investigated the practice of caregiving at nursing homes in the Northern Italy in the form of a case-study. We mainly focus on the work practices of care professionals, and on the relational issues between professional and family caregivers. The outcomes of this work shed new light on the opportunities of using ICT solutions to improve relations and information sharing among caregivers.

References

  1. Britt Almberg, Margareta Grafström, Kathleen Krichbaum, and Bengt Winblad. 2000. The interplay of institution and family caregiving: Relations between patient hassles, nursing home hassles and caregivers' burnout. International journal of geriatric psychiatry 15, 10 (2000), 931--939.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ivan Breskovic, Aparecido Fabiano Pinatti De Carvalho, Susanne Schinkinger, and Hilda Tellioğlu. 2013. Social awareness support for meeting informal carers needs: early development in TOPIC. ECSCW 2013 (2013), 3--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nicholas G Castle and John Engberg. 2005. Staff turnover and quality of care in nursing homes. Medical care 43, 6 (2005), 616--626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 1985. Managing chronic illness at home: three lines of work. Qualitative sociology 8, 3 (1985), 224--247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nicole DePasquale, Kelly D Davis, Steven H Zarit, Phyllis Moen, Leslie B Hammer, and David M Almeida. 2014. Combining formal and informal caregiving roles: The psychosocial implications of double-and triple-duty care. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences (2014), gbu139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marie T Duncan and David L Morgan. 1994. Sharing the caring: Family caregivers' views of their relationships with nursing home staff. The Gerontologist 34, 2 (1994), 235--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Farhad Fatehi and Richard Wootton. 2012. Telemedicine, telehealth or e-health? A bibliometric analysis of the trends in the use of these terms. Journal of telemedicine and telecare 18, 8 (2012), 460--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Barney G Glaser and Anselm Leonard Strauss. 1975. Chronic illness and the quality of life. Sociology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeannie L Haggerty, Robert J Reid, George K Freeman, Barbara H Starfield, Carol E Adair, and Rachael McKendry. 2003. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ: British Medical Journal 327, 7425 (2003), 1219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. MR Hastall, ND Eiermann, and U Ritterfeld. 2014. Formal and informal carers views on ICT in dementia care: Insights from two qualitative studies. Gerontechnology 13, 1 (2014), 51--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. TJGM Hazelhof, L Schoonhoven, BGI van Gaal, RTCM Koopmans, and DL Gerritsen. 2016. Nursing staff stress from challenging behaviour of residents with dementia: a concept analysis. International nursing review 63, 3 (2016), 507--516.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Annika Hertzberg, Sirkka-Liisa Ekman, and Karin Axelsson. 2003. Relatives are a resource, but: registered nurses' views and experiences of relatives of residents in nursing homes. Journal of clinical nursing 12, 3 (2003), 431--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jun-Ho Huh, Namjug Kim, and Kyungryong Seo. 2016. Design and implementation of mobile medication-hour notification system with push service function. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res 11, 2 (2016), 1225--1231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Meridean L Maas, David Reed, Myonghwa Park, Janet P Specht, Debra Schutte, Lisa S Kelley, Elizabeth A Swanson, Toni Trip-Reimer, and Kathleen C Buckwalte. 2004. Outcomes of family involvement in care intervention for caregivers of individuals with dementia. Nursing research 53, 2 (2004), 76--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vasiliki Matziou, Efrosyni Vlahioti, Pantelis Perdikaris, Theodora Matziou, Efstathia Megapanou, and Konstantinos Petsios. 2014. Physician and nursing perceptions concerning interprofessional communication and collaboration. Journal of interprofessional care 28, 6 (2014), 526--533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Vasiliki Matziou, Efrosyni Vlahioti, Pantelis Perdikaris, Theodora Matziou, Efstathia Megapanou, and Konstantinos Petsios. 2014. Physician and nursing perceptions concerning interprofessional communication and collaboration. Journal of interprofessional care 28, 6 (2014), 526--533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Stephanie McFall and Baila H Miller. 1992. Caregiver burden and nursing home admission of frail elderly persons. Journal of Gerontology 47, 2 (1992), S73--S79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Stefan Sävenstedt, Per-Olof Sandman, and Karin Zingmark. 2006. The duality in using information and communication technology in elder care. Journal of advanced nursing 56, 1 (2006), 17--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. David Silverman. 2016. Qualitative research. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dana Beth Weinberg, R William Lusenhop, Jody Hoffer Gittell, and Cori M Kautz. 2007. Coordination between formal providers and informal caregivers. Health care management review 32, 2 (2007), 140--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Merrick Zwarenstein, Joanne Goldman, and Scott Reeves. 2009. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3, 3 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. SA Zwijsen, A Kabboord, JA Eefsting, CMPM Hertogh, AM Pot, DL Gerritsen, and M Smalbrugge. 2014. Nurses in distress? An explorative study into the relation between distress and individual neuropsychiatric symptoms of people with dementia in nursing homes. International journal of geriatric psychiatry 29, 4 (2014), 384--391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design Considerations to Support Nursing Homes' Communities

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          C&T '17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies
          June 2017
          345 pages
          ISBN:9781450348546
          DOI:10.1145/3083671

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 June 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          C&T '17 Paper Acceptance Rate34of66submissions,52%Overall Acceptance Rate80of183submissions,44%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader