research-article

A systematic review on the use of Definition of Done on agile software development projects

Authors:

Thalles Araújo,

Mirko Perkusich,

Ednaldo Dilorenzo,

Angelo PerkusichAuthors Info & Claims

EASE '17: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering

Pages 364 - 373

https://doi.org/10.1145/3084226.3084262

Published: 15 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Background: Definition of Done (DoD) is a Scrum practice that consists of a simple list of criteria that adds verifiable or demonstrable value to the product. It is one of the most popular agile practices and assures a balance between short-term delivery of features and long-term product quality, but little is known of its actual use in Agile teams.

Objective: To identify possible gaps in the literature and define a starting point to define DoD for practitioners through the identification and synthesis of the DoD criteria used in agile projects as presented in the scientific literature.

Method: We applied a Systematic Literature Review of studies published up to (and including) 2016 through database search and backward and forward snowballing.

Results: In total, we evaluated 2326 papers, of which 8 included DoD criteria used in agile projects. We identified that some studies presented up to 4 levels of DoD, which include story, sprint, release or project. We identified 62 done criteria, which are related to software verification and validation, deploy, code inspection, test process quality, regulatory compliance, software architecture design, process management, configuration management and non-functional requirements.

Conclusion: The main implication for research is a need for more and better empirical studies documenting and evaluating the use of the DoD in agile software development. For the industry, the review provides a map of how DoD is currently being used in the industry and can be used as a starting point to define or compare with their own DoD definition.

References

[1]

Nauman Bin Ali, Kai Petersen, and Claes Wohlin. 2014. A Systematic Literature Review on the Industrial Use of Software Process Simulation. J. Syst. Softw. 97, C (Oct. 2014), 65--85.

Digital Library

[2]

Deepika Badampudi, Claes Wohlin, and Kai Petersen. 2015. Experiences from Using Snowballing and Database Searches in Systematic Literature Studies. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 10 pages.

Digital Library

[3]

Pearl Brereton, Barbara A. Kitchenham, David Budgen, Mark Turner, and Mohamed Khalil. 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software 80, 4 (2007), 571--583.

Digital Library

[4]

Meghann Drury, Kieran Conboy, and Ken Power. 2012. Obstacles to Decision Making in Agile Software Development Teams. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 6 (June 2012), 1239--1254.

Digital Library

[5]

Tore Dybå and Torgeir Dingsøyr. 2008. Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology 50, 9--10 (2008), 833--859.

Digital Library

[6]

Veli-Pekka Eloranta, Kai Koskimies, and Tommi Mikkonen. 2016. Exploring ScrumBut---An empirical study of Scrum anti-patterns. Information and Software Technology 74 (2016), 194--203.

Digital Library

[7]

Katia Romero Felizardo, Emilia Mendes, Marcos Kalinowski, Érica Ferreira Souza, and Nandamudi L. Vijaykumar. 2016. Using Forward Snowballing to Update Systematic Reviews in Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 53, 6 pages.

Digital Library

[8]

B. Kitchenham and S. Charters. 2007. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical Report EBSE-2007-01. Schoolf of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University.

[9]

M. Shaw. 2003. Writing good software engineering research papers. In 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 726--736.

Digital Library

[10]

Mark Staples and Mahmood Niazi. 2007. Experiences Using Systematic Review Guidelines. J. Syst. Softw. 80, 9 (Sept. 2007), 1425--1437.

Digital Library

[11]

Jeff Sutherland and Ken Schwaber. 2013. The Scrum Guide. http://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v1/Scrum-Guide-US.pdf. (2013). Accessed: 2016-03-02.

[12]

Paolo Tonella, Marco Torchiano, Bart Du Bois, and Tarja Systä. 2007. Empirical studies in reverse engineering: state of the art and future trends. Empirical Software Engineering 12, 5 (2007), 551--571.

Digital Library

[13]

VersionOne. 2016. 10th Annual State of Agile Development Survey Results. (2016).

[14]

Roel Wieringa, Neil Maiden, Nancy Mead, and Colette Rolland. 2006. Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion. Requirements Engineering 11, 1 (2006), 102--107.

Digital Library

[15]

Laurie Williams. 2012. What Agile Teams Think of Agile Principles. Commun. ACM 55, 4 (April 2012), 71--76.

Digital Library

[16]

Claes Wohlin. 2014. Guidelines for Snowballing in Systematic Literature Studies and a Replication in Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 38, 10 pages.

Digital Library

Cited By

Paris AGuerra ESilveira FSilva K(2024)Patterns for Small Adjustments in the Development Process to Deal with Architectural UncertaintiesProceedings of the 29th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, People, and Practices10.1145/3698322.3698335(1-8)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3698322.3698335
Alpers SKrings BBecker CRill MWeinreuter M(2024)Ethische, rechtliche und soziale Aspekte (ELSA) der Gestaltung von KI-Systemen: Systematisierung der Betrachtung durch Vorgehensmodelle und LeitfädenEthical, legal and social implications (ELSI) of the design of AI systems: Systematization of the consideration through procedure models and guidelinesZeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft10.1007/s41449-024-00422-978:2(160-169)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-024-00422-9
Santos RRalph PArshad AStol K(2023)Distributed Scrum: A Case Meta-analysisACM Computing Surveys10.1145/362651956:4(1-37)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626519
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A systematic review on the use of Definition of Done on agile software development projects
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software development process management
      1. Software development methods
        Agile software development

Recommendations

Systematic literature review on agile practices in global software development
Abstract Context
Developing software in distributed development environments exhibits coordination, control and communication challenges. Agile practices, which demand frequent communication and self-organization between remote sites, are increasingly ...
Software Process Improvement in Agile Software Development A Systematic Literature Review
SEAA '15: Proceedings of the 2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications

It is recognized the relevance and importance that software process improvement (SPI) and agile development have gained in the field of software engineering. Both are approaches that increase the efficiency and effectiveness of a software development ...
Agile Global Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review
SBES '20: Proceedings of the XXXIV Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering

Global Software Development (GSD) continues to grow substantially and it is fast becoming the norm and fundamentally different from local Software Engineering development. Withal, agile software development (ASD) has become an appealing choice for ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

EASE '17: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering

June 2017

405 pages

ISBN:9781450348041

DOI:10.1145/3084226

Conference Chair:
Emilia Mendes,
Program Chairs:
Steve Counsell,
Kai Petersen

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

School of Computing, BTH: Blekinge Institute of Technology - School of Computing

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 June 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

EASE'17

EASE'17: Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering

June 15 - 16, 2017

Karlskrona, Sweden

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 232 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

21
Total Citations
View Citations
1,003
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)159
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Paris AGuerra ESilveira FSilva K(2024)Patterns for Small Adjustments in the Development Process to Deal with Architectural UncertaintiesProceedings of the 29th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, People, and Practices10.1145/3698322.3698335(1-8)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3698322.3698335
Alpers SKrings BBecker CRill MWeinreuter M(2024)Ethische, rechtliche und soziale Aspekte (ELSA) der Gestaltung von KI-Systemen: Systematisierung der Betrachtung durch Vorgehensmodelle und LeitfädenEthical, legal and social implications (ELSI) of the design of AI systems: Systematization of the consideration through procedure models and guidelinesZeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft10.1007/s41449-024-00422-978:2(160-169)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-024-00422-9
Santos RRalph PArshad AStol K(2023)Distributed Scrum: A Case Meta-analysisACM Computing Surveys10.1145/362651956:4(1-37)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626519
Sherif EHelmy WGalal-Edeen G(2023)Proposed Framework to Manage Non-Functional Requirements in AgileIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.328119511(53995-54005)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3281195
Rani PBlasi AStulova NPanichella SGorla ANierstrasz O(2023)A decade of code comment quality assessmentJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2022.111515195:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111515
Dehghani RRamsin R(2023)A knowledge management-driven and DevOps-based method for situational method engineeringInformation Technology and Management10.1007/s10799-023-00386-y24:3(267-291)Online publication date: 18-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-023-00386-y
Thörn JStrandberg PSundmark DAfzal W(2022)Quality assuring the quality assurance tool: applying safety-critical concepts to test framework developmentPeerJ Computer Science10.7717/peerj-cs.11318(e1131)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1131
Whiting EDatta S(2022)Design and Development of a Technology-Agnostic NFR Testing Framework2022 The 5th International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management (ICSIM)10.1145/3520084.3520092(45-50)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2022
https://doi.org/10.1145/3520084.3520092
Campanile LIacono MMastroianni M(2022)Towards privacy-aware software design in small and medium enterprises2022 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech)10.1109/DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/Cy55231.2022.9927958(1-8)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/Cy55231.2022.9927958
Kopczyńska SOchodek MPiechowiak JNawrocki J(2022)On the benefits and problems related to using Definition of Done — A survey studyJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2022.111479193:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111479
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten