skip to main content
10.1145/3085228.3085280acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Competitive Capability Framework for Open Government Data Organizations

Published:07 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Open data-driven organizations compete in a complex and uncertain environment with growing global competition, changing and emerging demand and market, and increasing levels of analytical tools and technology. For these organizations to exploit open data for competitive advantage, they need to develop the requisite competitive capabilities. This article presents an open data competitive capability framework grounded in theory and practice of open data. Based on extant literature and insights from domain experts, we identify and describe four dimensions of competitive capabilities required for open data driven organizations. We argue that by implementing the proposed framework, organizations can increase their chances to favorably compete in their respective markets. We further argue that by understanding open government data as a strategic resource for enterprises, government as producers or suppliers of this resource become key partners to data-driven organizations.

References

  1. State Street Corporation, "Leader or Laggard? How Data Drives Competitive Advantage in the Investment Community," Boston, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Fawcett, "Examining open data as a source of competitive advantage for big businesses," in Open Data Research Symposium, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. F. Ahmadi Zeleti and A. Ojo, "Capability Matrix for Open Data," in 15th IFIP working conference on virtual enterprises, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. A. V. & W. J. D. Xenophon A. Koufteros and To, "Examining the Competitive Capabilities of Manufacturing Firms," Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 233--255, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Oliver, "Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views," Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 697--713, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. F. Ahmadi Zeleti, A. Ojo, and E. Curry, "Exploring the economic value of open government data," Gov. Inf. Q., 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. Ahmadi Zeleti, A. Ojo, and E. Curry, "Business Models for the Open Data Industry: Characterization and Analysis of Emerging Models," in 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. S. Bharadwaj, "A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation," MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 169--193, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Broberg, J. Choate, and A. Coonin, "IT Application Strategy," 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gartner Research, "Six Building Blocks for Creating Real IT Strategies," 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. V. Roth and M. Van Der Velde, "Operations as marketing: A competitive service strategy," J. Oper. Manag., vol. 103, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. W. Platts, J. F. Mills, M. C. Bourne, A. D. Neely, A. H. Richards, and M. Gregory, "Testing manufacturing strategy formulation processes," Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 56--57, pp. 517--523, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. S. Lim, K. Platts, and T. Minshall, "An exploratory study on manufacturing strategy formulation in start-up companies," 16th High Technol. Small Firms Conf., 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. Kerr, "The Development of a Data Quality Framework and Strategy for the New Zealand Ministry of Health," Auckland, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Nurcahyo and A. D. Wibowo, "Manufacturing Capability, Manufacturing Strategy and Performance of Indonesia Automotive Component Manufacturer," in 12th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing -- Emerging Potentials, 2015, vol. 26, pp. 653--657.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. E. M. Olson, S. F. Slater, and G. T. M. Hult, "The Performance Implications of Fit Among Business Strategy, Marketing Organization Structure, and Strategic Behavior," J. Mark., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 49--65, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. I. Dirisu, O. Iyiola, and O. S. Ibidunni, "Product differentiation: A tool of competitive advantage and optimal organizational performance," Eur. Sci. Journa, vol. 9, no. 34, pp. 258--281, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. E. Miles, C. C. Snow, A. D. Meyer, H. J. Coleman, R. E. Miles, C. C. Snow, and A. D. Meyer, "Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process," Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 3, no. July, pp. 546--562, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. G. G. Dess and P. S. Davis, "Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance," Acad. Manag. J., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 467--488, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Michael E. Porter, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, 1st ed. Free Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. E. Porter, "Competitive Advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance," New York, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Eriksson and E. Karlsson, "A case study: A market analysis and a capability assessment," CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Majumdar, "Modelling growth strategy in small entrepreneurial business organisations," J. Entrep., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 157--168, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Haeussler, "The Determinants of Commercialization Strategy: Idiosyncrasies in British and German Biotechnology," Entrep. Pract., vol. 33, no. 4, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. C. Zott and R. Amit, "The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance," Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 29, no. 1, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. A. Clarke and M. Fuller, "Collaborative Strategic Management: Strategy Formulation and Implementation by Multi-Organizational Cross-Sector Social Partnerships," J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 94, no. SUPPL. 1, pp. 85--101, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. H. Wang, "Theories for competitive advantage," in Being Practical with Theory: A Window into Business Research, Wollongong, Australia, 2014, pp. 33--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. T. Khanna and J. W. Rivkin, "Interorganizational Ties and Business Group Boundaries: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Organ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 333--352, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. W. Czakon, "Relational capability of organizations: Theoretical advances," J. Econ. Manag., vol. 5, pp. 48--65, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J. H. Dyer and H. Singh, "Cooperative the Relational and Sources of Strategy Competitive Advantage," Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 660--679, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. V. Charles and T. Gherman, "Achieving competitive advantage through big data. Strategic implications," Middle East J. Sci. Res., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1069--1074, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. M. Hosseini and N. Sheikhi, "An Empirical Examination of Competitive Capability's Contribution toward Firm Performance: Moderating Role of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty," Int. Bus. Res., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 116--131, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. T. N. Mursitama, "Creating relational rents: The effect of business groups on affiliated firms' performance in Indonesia," Asia Pacific J. Manag., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 537--557, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. C.-C. Hsu and B. A. Sandford, "The Delphi Technique: Making Sense Of Consensus," Pract. Assessment, Res. Eval., vol. 12, no. 10, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. S. Hanafin, "Review of literature on the Delphi Technique," 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. M. L. McHugh, "Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic," Biochem Med, vol. 22, no. 3, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Virginia SIC Semper Tyrannis, "Commonwealth of Virginia Data Strategy," 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. W. Eckerson, "Data Quality and the BottomLine: Achieving Business Success through a Commitment to High Quality Data," 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. R. Perera and P. Nand, "KiwiLOD: A Framework to Transform New Zealand Open Data to Linked Open Data," Int. J. Digit. Inf. Wirel. Commun., vol. 6, no. 3, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. MIT Technology Review and Oracle, "The Rise of Data Capital," 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. R. Agarwal, E. Baltassis, J. Brock, and J. Platt, "Enabling Big Data: Building Capabilities that Really Matter," Boston, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. R. Wegener and V. Sinha, "The Value of Big Data: How Analytics Differentiates Winners," 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. P. Wongthongtham, B. Zadjabbari, and H. M. Naqvi, "Simulation of Knowledge Sharing in Business Intelligence," Int. J. Digit. Inf. Wirel. Commun., vol. 6, no. 3, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Gartner, "Building the Digital Platform: The 2016 CIO Agenda Report," 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. D. Castro and T. Korte, "Open Data in the G8: A Review of Progress on the Open Data Charter," 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. MIT Technology Review Custom, "How Data Capital Creates Competitive Advantage," MIT Technology Review, 2016. {Online}. Available: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601379/how-data-capital-creates-competitive-advantage/. {Accessed: 26-Aug-2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. T. Pringle, "Data-as-a-Service: The Next Step in the As-a-Service Journey," 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Numerical Algorithms Group, "Embedded Analytics - A cure for the common code," 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. A. Wolff, D. Gooch, J. J. C. Montaner, U. Rashid, and G. Kortuem, "Creating an understanding of data literacy for a data-driven society," J. Community Informatics, vol. 12, no. 3, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. S. N. G. Aoife Gavin, Colette Kelly, "Key issues for consideration in the development of a data strategy: A review of the literature," Dublin, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. M. E. Porter and V. E. Millar, "How Information Gives You Competitive advantage," Harv. Bus. Rev., 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Oracle Data Integrator, "The Five Most Common Big Data Integration Mistakes To Avoid," 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. K. Nixon, "Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Creating Business Value through Data Relationships," 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. J. Rose, C. Barton, R. Souza, and J. Platt, "The Trust Advantage - How to win with Big Data," 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. European Commission, "Creating Value through Open Data: Study on the Impact of Re-use of Public Data Resources," 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. H. Koski, "Does Marginal Cost Pricing of Public Sector Information Spur Firm Growth?," 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. D. B.- European, "Guidelines on recommended standard licences, datasets and charging for the reuse of documents," Off. J. Eur. Union, pp. 1--11, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. M. Declaration, "European SMEs Seize the Cloud Policies to promote Economic Growth through Cloud Computing," no. June 2010, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. K. Sinclair, "Strategic Data Management," 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Deloitte, "Open data Driving growth, ingenuity and innovation," 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. J. B. Barney, "Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy," Manage. Sci., vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1231--1241, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. S. Agha, L. Alrubaiee, and M. Jamhour, "Effect of Core Competence on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance," Int. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 192--204, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. T. Pearson and R. Wegener, "Big data: The organizational challenge," Bain Co., 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. M. C. Becker and M. P. Knudsen, "Intra and inter-organizational knowledge transfer processes: Identifying the missing links," 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Deloitte, "Deloitte Analytics Advantage," 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. F. Dälken, "Are Porter's Five Competitive Forces still Applicable? A Critical Examination concerning the Relevance for Today's Business," in 3rd IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Booz Allen, "Tips for Building a Data Science Capability," 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Deloitte, "Open growth Stimulating demand for open data in the UK," 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. The Saylor Foundation, "Strategy Formulation," 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, K. Poulis, and G. van de Kaa, "Open Data for Competitive Advantage: Insights from Open Data Use by Companies," in Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2015), 2015, pp. 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, "The Strategy-Focused Organization," Harvard Bus. Sch. Press, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1--8, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. L. Saldana, P. Chamberlain, W. D. Bradford, M. Campbell, and J. Landsverk, "The cost of implementing new strategies (COINS): A method for mapping implementation resources using the stages of implementation completion," Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 39, pp. 177--182, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Competitive Capability Framework for Open Government Data Organizations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      dg.o '17: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
      June 2017
      639 pages
      ISBN:9781450353175
      DOI:10.1145/3085228

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      dg.o '17 Paper Acceptance Rate66of114submissions,58%Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader