Abstract
Low cost digital cameras in smartphones and wearable devices make it easy for people to automatically capture and share images as a visual lifelog. Having been inspired by a US campus based study that explored individual privacy behaviours of visual lifeloggers, we conducted a similar study on a UK campus, however we also focussed on the privacy behaviours of groups of lifeloggers. We argue for the importance of replicability and therefore we built a publicly available toolkit, which includes camera design, study guidelines and source code. Our results show some similar sharing behaviour to the US based study: people tried to preserve the privacy of strangers, but we found fewer bystander reactions despite using a more obvious camera. In contrast, we did not find a reluctance to share images of screens but we did find that images of vices were shared less. Regarding privacy behaviours in groups of lifeloggers, we found that people were more willing to share images of people they were interacting with than of strangers, that lifelogging in groups could change what defines a private space, and that lifelogging groups establish different rules to manage privacy for those inside and outside the group.
- Alessandro Acquisti and Ralph Gross. 2006. Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In International workshop on privacy enhancing technologies. Springer, 36--58. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/11957454_3 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Irwin Altman. 1975. The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Monterey, Calif.Google Scholar
- Barak Ariel, Alex Sutherland, Darren Henstock, Josh Young, Paul Drover, Jayne Sykes, Simon Megicks, and Ryan Henderson. 2016. “Contagious Accountability” A Global Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on CitizensâĂŹ Complaints Against the Police. Criminal Justice and Behavior (2016), 0093854816668218. http://cjb.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/09/21/0093854816668218.abstractGoogle Scholar
- Richard A Armstrong. 2014. When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 34, 5 (2014), 502--508.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lemi Baruh and Zeynep Cemalcilar. 2014. It is more than personal: Development and validation of a multidimensional privacy orientation scale. Personality and Individual Differences 70 (Nov. 2014), 165--170.Google Scholar
- danah boyd. 2010. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, Zizi Papacharissi (Ed.). 39--58. http://www.danah.org/papers/2010/SNSasNetworkedPublicsGoogle Scholar
- Kelly Erinn Caine. 2009. Exploring everyday privacy behaviors and misclosures. PhD. Georgia Institute of Technology. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/31665Google Scholar
- Jennifer L. Carlson, Mike Paget, and Tim McCollum. 2013. Replicating Two TelePresence Camera Depth-of-Field Settings in One User Experience Study. (2013). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-976/spaper6.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Soumyadeb Chowdhury, Md Sadek Ferdous, and Joemon M. Jose. 2016. Lifelogging User Study: Bystander Privacy. In Proceedings of British HCI - Fusion. BCS, pp. 2. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Soumyadeb Chowdhury, Md Sadek Ferdous, and Joemon M. Jose. 2016. Understanding Lifelog Sharing Preferences of Lifeloggers. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 649--651. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Clinch, Nigel Davies, Mateusz Mikusz, Paul Metzger, Marc Langheinrich, Albrecht Schmidt, and Geoff Ward. 2016. Collecting Shared Experiences through Lifelogging: Lessons Learned. Pervasive Computing, IEEE 15, 1 (2016), 58--67. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7389256 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Fitzpatrick. 2014. Why Google Glass Isn’t the Future. TIME.com (Nov. 2014). http://time.com/3588143/google-glass/Google Scholar
- Ruth Gavison. 1980. Privacy and the Limits of Law. The Yale Law Journal 89, 3 (Jan. 1980), 421.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erving Goffman. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
- Cathal Gurrin, Rami Albatal, Hideo Joho, and Kaori Ishii. 2014. A privacy by design approach to lifelogging. Digital Enlightenment Yearbook (2014), 49--73.Google Scholar
- Andrew F Hayes and Klaus Krippendorff. 2007. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication methods and measures 1, 1 (2007), 77--89.Google Scholar
- S. Hodges, L. Williams, E. Berry, S. Izadi, J. Srinivasan, A. Butler, G. Smyth, N. Kapur, and K. Wood. 2006. SenseCam: A retrospective memory aid. UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing (2006), 177--193. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Houghton, Adam Joinson, Nigel Caldwell, and Ben Marder. 2013. Tagger’s delight? Disclosure and liking in Facebook: the effects of sharing photographs amongst multiple known social circles. Technical Report. http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/1723Google Scholar
- Roberto Hoyle, Robert Templeman, Denise Anthony, David Crandall, and Apu Kapadia. 2015. Sensitive Lifelogs: A Privacy Analysis of Photos from Wearable Cameras. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 1645--1648. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roberto Hoyle, Robert Templeman, Steven Armes, Denise Anthony, David Crandall, and Apu Kapadia. 2014. Privacy behaviors of lifeloggers using wearable cameras. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2014), 571--582. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carlos Jensen, Colin Potts, and Christian Jensen. 2005. Privacy Practices of Internet Users: Self-reports Versus Observed Behavior. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 63, 1-2 (July 2005), 203--227. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Kelly, Simon J. Marshall, Hannah Badland, Jacqueline Kerr, Melody Oliver, Aiden R. Doherty, and Charlie Foster. 2013. An Ethical Framework for Automated, Wearable Cameras in Health Behavior Research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 44, 3 (March 2013), 314--319.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marion Koelle, Matthias Kranz, and Andreas MÃũller. 2015. Don’t look at me that way!: Understanding User Attitudes Towards Data Glasses Usage. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM Press, 362--372. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohammed Korayem, Robert Templeman, Dennis Chen, David Crandall, and Apu Kapadia. 2014. Screenavoider: Protecting computer screens from ubiquitous cameras. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.0008 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.0008Google Scholar
- David Kushner. 2011. The Making of Arduino. IEEE Spectrum (26 Oct. 2011). http://spectrum.ieee.org/geek-life/hands-on/the-making-of-arduinoGoogle Scholar
- Carine Lallemand, Vincent Koenig, and Guillaume Gronier. 2013. Replicating an international survey on user experience: challenges, successes and limitations. In Proceedings of RepliCHI - CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA ’13). 5.Google Scholar
- Clara Mancini, K. Thomas, Y Rogers, Blaine A. Price, L. Jedrzejczyk, A. K Bandara, A. N Joinson, and B. Nuseibeh. 2009. From spaces to places: emerging contexts in mobile privacy. In Proc. of UbiComp2009. 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve Mann. 1998. ‘WearCam’ (The Wearable Camera): Personal Imaging Systems for long--term use in wearable tetherless computer-mediated reality and personal Photo/Videographic Memory Prosthesis. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE Computer Society, 124. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gary T. Marx. 2003. A Tack in the Shoe: Neutralizing and Resisting the New Surveillance. Journal of Social Issues 59, 2 (June 2003), 369--390.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miguel A. Nacenta, Yemliha Kamber, Yizhou Qiang, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2013. Memorability of Pre-designed and User-defined Gesture Sets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1099--1108. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Narrative. 2017. Narrative Clip. (2017). http://getnarrative.comGoogle Scholar
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2010. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life. Standford University Press, Standford, California. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patricia A. Norberg and Daniel R. Horne. 2007. Privacy attitudes and privacy-related behavior. Psychology and Marketing 24, 10 (2007), 829--847.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349, 6251 (Aug. 2015), aac4716--aac4716.Google Scholar
- Sandra S. Petronio. 2002. Boundaries of privacy: dialectics of disclosure. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Rebecca S. Portnoff, Linda N. Lee, Serge Egelman, Pratyush Mishra, Derek Leung, and David Wagner. 2015. Somebody’s Watching Me?: Assessing the Effectiveness of Webcam Indicator Lights. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 1649--1658. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. D. Reicher, R. Spears, and T. Postmes. 1995. A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology 6, 1 (Jan. 1995), 161--198.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luis Sanchez, José Antonio Galache, Veronica Gutierrez, Jose Manuel Hernandez, Jesús Bernat, Alex Gluhak, and Tomás Garcia. 2011. Smartsantander: The meeting point between future internet research and experimentation and the smart cities. In Future Network 8 Mobile Summit (FutureNetw), 2011. IEEE, 1--8.Google Scholar
- Inc. Snap. 2017. Snapchat Spectacles. (2017). https://www.spectacles.com/Google Scholar
- Flávio Souza, Diego de Las Casas, Vinícius Flores, SunBum Youn, Meeyoung Cha, Daniele Quercia, and Virgílio Almeida. 2015. Dawn of the Selfie Era: The Whos, Wheres, and Hows of Selfies on Instagram. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Conference on Online Social Networks (COSN ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 221--231. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iuliu Vasilescu, Keith Kotay, Daniela Rus, Matthew Dunbabin, and Peter Corke. 2005. Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. ACM, 154--165. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A.F. Westin. 1967. Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum. https://books.google.ae/books?id=ydMlnQEACAAJGoogle Scholar
- Alan F. Westin. 2003. Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy. Journal of Social Issues 59, 2 (2003), 431--453.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Max L. Wilson, Ed H. Chi, Stuart Reeves, and David Coyle. 2014. RepliCHI: The Workshop II. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 33--36. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Max L. L. Wilson, Paul Resnick, David Coyle, and Ed H. Chi. 2013. RepliCHI: The Workshop. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3159--3162. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mu Yang, Yijun Yu, Arosha K. Bandara, and Bashar Nuseibeh. 2014. Adaptive sharing for online social networks: a trade-off between privacy risk and social benefit. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom). IEEE, 45--52. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Logging you, Logging me: A Replicable Study of Privacy and Sharing Behaviour in Groups of Visual Lifeloggers
Recommendations
Enhancing Lifelogging Privacy by Detecting Screens
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsLow-cost, lightweight wearable cameras let us record (or 'lifelog') our lives from a 'first-person' perspective for purposes ranging from fun to therapy. But they also capture private information that people may not want to be recorded, especially if ...
Privacy behaviors of lifeloggers using wearable cameras
UbiComp '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous ComputingA number of wearable 'lifelogging' camera devices have been released recently, allowing consumers to capture images and other sensor data continuously from a first-person perspective. Unlike traditional cameras that are used deliberately and ...
Understanding lifelog sharing preferences of lifeloggers
OzCHI '16: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human InteractionThe lifelogging activity enables users, the lifeloggers, to passively capture images using wearable cameras from a first person perspective and ultimately create a visual diary encoding every possible aspect of their life with unprecedented details. ...
Comments