skip to main content
10.1145/3091478.3091498acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterizing Regional and Behavioral Device Variations Across the Twitter Timeline: A Longitudinal Study

Published:25 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Physical devices, such as smartphones and laptops, provide the key interface through which users engage with the social media world. Yet despite the broad range of devices used on social media platforms, relatively little is known about how usage varies on a device to device level. In this work, we use a 10 sample of Twitter data spanning two consecutive years and encompassing 365.98 million users to perform a longitudinal, measurement-driven analysis of five prevalent device types - Android, iPhone-iOS, BlackBerry, other mobile devices, and nonmobile devices - across the time period. We study the global and regional usage patterns, as well as the regional distribution, of devices; investigate differences and similarities in behavioral patterns across devices with respect to tweet sentiment, daytime usage patterns, and feature usage (such as mentions, URLs, hashtags) over time; and quantify the level of "device homophily" (i.e., assortativity) within the Twitter device network. Our results reveal that key variations exist among these device groups, in addition to notable similarities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large-scale longitudinal analysis of various distinct Twitter devices.

References

  1. Jisun An and Ingmar Weber. 2016. #greysanatomy vs. #yankees: Demographics and Hashtag Use on Twitter. CoRR abs/1603.01973 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01973Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ryan Compton, David Jurgens, and David Allen. 2014. Geotagging One Hundred Million Twitter Accounts with Total Variation Minimization. CoRR abs/1404.7152 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Robert West, Dan Jurafsky, Jure Leskovec, and Christopher Potts. 2013. No Country for Old Members: User Lifecycle and Linguistic Change in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 307--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Peter Sheridan Dodds, Kameron Decker Harris, Isabel M. Kloumann, Catherine A. Bliss, and Christopher M. Danforth. 2011. Temporal Patterns of Happiness and Information in a Global Social Network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. CoRR abs/1101.5120 (2011). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr1101.html# abs-1101--5120Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hossein Falaki, Ratul Mahajan, Srikanth Kandula, Dimitrios Lymberopoulos, Ramesh Govindan, and Deborah Estrin. 2010. Diversity in Smartphone Usage. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '10). New York, NY, USA, 179--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Flavio Figueiredo, Fabrício Benevenuto, and Jussara M. Almeida. 2011. The Tube over Time: Characterizing Popularity Growth of Youtube Videos. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '11). New York, NY, USA, 745--754. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jeon Hyung Kang and Kristina Lerman. 2012. Using Lists to Measure Homophily on Twitter. In AAAI Technical Report WS-12-09. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 26--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Peter Li, Jiejun Xu, and Tsai-Ching Lu. 2015. Leveraging Homophily to Infer Demographic Attributes: Inferring the Age of Twitter Users Using Label Propagation. In Proceedings of Workshop on Information In Networks (WIN15).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 1 (2001), 415--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Alan Mislove, Sune Lehmann, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, and J. Niels Rosenquist. 2011. Understanding the Demographics of Twitter Users. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM'11). Barcelona, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis Mitchell, Kameron Decker Harris, Morgan R. Frank, Peter Sheridan Dodds, and Christopher M. Danforth. 2013. The Geography of Happiness: Connecting Twitter sentiment and expression, demographics, and objective characteristics of place. CoRR abs/1302.3299 (2013). http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr1302.html#abs-1302-3299Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. E. J. Newman. 2003. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys. Rev. E 67, 2 (Feb. 2003), 026126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mathieu Perreault and Derek Ruths. 2011. The Effect of Mobile Platforms on Twitter Content Generation. In International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/view/2798Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Barbara Poblete, Ruth Garcia, Marcelo Mendoza, and Alejandro Jaimes. 2011. Do All Birds Tweet the Same?: Characterizing Twitter Around the World. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '11). New York, NY, USA, 1025--1030. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Statista-The Statistics Portal. 2016. Statistics and facts about Smartphones. https://www.statista.com/topics/840/. (2016). Accessed: 2016-10-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Statista-The Statistics Portal. 2016. Statistics and facts about Social Networks. http://www.statista.com/topics/1164/. (2016). Accessed: 2016-10-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. David Sayce. 2016. Number of tweets per day? http://www.dsayce.com/socialmedia/10-billions-tweets/. (2016). Accessed: 2016-10-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gang Wang, Konark Gill, Manish Mohanlal, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y. Zhao. 2013. Wisdom in the Social Crowd: An Analysis of Quora. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1341--1352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jiejun Xu, Ryan Compton, Tsai-Ching Lu, and David Allen. 2014. Rolling Through Tumblr: Characterizing Behavioral Patterns of the Microblogging Platform. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science (WebSci '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jiejun Xu and Tsai-Ching Lu. 2015. Toward precise user-topic alignment in online social media. In Big Data (Big Data), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 767--775. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jiejun Xu, Tsai-Ching Lu, Ryan Compton, and David Allen. 2014. Civil unrest prediction: A tumblr-based exploration. In International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. Springer, 403--411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jiejun Xu, Tsai-Ching Lu, Ryan Compton, and David Allen. 2014. Quantifying cross-platform engagement through large-scale user alignment. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science. ACM, 281--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Faiyaz Al Zamal, Wendy Liu, and Derek Ruths. 2012. Homophily and Latent Attribute Inference: Inferring Latent Attributes of Twitter Users from Neighbors. In ICWSM, John G. Breslin, Nicole B. Ellison, James G. Shanahan, and Zeynep Tufekci (Eds.). The AAAI Press. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icwsm/icwsm2012.html#ZamalLR12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing Regional and Behavioral Device Variations Across the Twitter Timeline: A Longitudinal Study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WebSci '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference
        June 2017
        438 pages
        ISBN:9781450348966
        DOI:10.1145/3091478

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 June 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WebSci '17 Paper Acceptance Rate30of85submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

        Upcoming Conference

        Websci '24
        16th ACM Web Science Conference
        May 21 - 24, 2024
        Stuttgart , Germany
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader