skip to main content
10.1145/3097983.3098112acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Incremental Dual-memory LSTM in Land Cover Prediction

Published:04 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Land cover prediction is essential for monitoring global environmental change. Unfortunately, traditional classification models are plagued by temporal variation and emergence of novel/unseen land cover classes in the prediction process. In this paper, we propose an LSTM-based spatio-temporal learning framework with a dual-memory structure. The dual-memory structure captures both long-term and short-term temporal variation patterns, and is updated incrementally to adapt the model to the ever-changing environment. Moreover, we integrate zero-shot learning to identify unseen classes even without labelled samples. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed framework over multiple baselines in land cover prediction.

References

  1. Kimberly M Carlson, Lisa M Curran, Gregory P Asner, Alice McDonald Pittman, Simon N Trigg, and J Marion Adeney 2013. Carbon emissions from forest conversion by Kalimantan oil palm plantations. Nature Climate Change (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Yanwei Fu, Timothy M Hospedales, Tao Xiang, Zhenyong Fu, and Shaogang Gong 2014. Transductive multi-view embedding for zero-shot recognition and annotation European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jacob Goldberger, Geoffrey E Hinton, Sam T Roweis, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov 2004. Neighbourhood components analysis. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A Graves, M Liwicki, S Fernández, R Bertolami, H Bunke, and J Schmidhuber. 2009. A novel connectionist system for unconstrained handwriting recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Nancy B Grimm, Stanley H Faeth, Nancy E Golubiewski, Charles L Redman, Jianguo Wu, Xuemei Bai, and John M Briggs 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. science (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Gunarso, M. E. Hartoyo, F. Agus, Killeen, T. J., and J. Goon. 2013. RSPO, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Reports from the technical panels of the 2nd greenhouse gas working group of the Roundtable on sustainable palm oil (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Collin Homer, Chengquan Huang, Limin Yang, Bruce Wylie, and Michael Coan 2004. Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Xiaowei Jia, Ankush Khandelwal, James Gerber, Kimberly Carlson, Paul West, and Vipin Kumar. 2016. Learning large-scale plantation mapping from imperfect annotators Big Data (Big Data), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Xiaowei Jia, Ankush Khandelwal, Guruprasad Nayak, James Gerber, Kimberly Carlson, Paul West, and Vipin Kumar 2017. Predict Land Covers with Transition. Modeling and Incremental Learning Proceedings of the 2017 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ian Jolliffe. 2002. Principal component analysis. Wiley Online Library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Anuj Karpatne, Zhe Jiang, Ranga Raju Vatsavai, Shashi Shekhar, and Vipin Kumar 2016. Monitoring Land-Cover Changes: A Machine-Learning Perspective. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eric F Lambin, Bi L Turner, Helmut J Geist, Samuel B Agbola, Arild Angelsen, John W Bruce, Oliver T Coomes, Rodolfo Dirzo, Günther Fischer, Carl Folke, and others 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global environmental change (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Xiaoyi Li, Xiaowei Jia, Hui Li, Houping Xiao, Jing Gao, and Aidong Zhang. 2015. DRN: Bringing Greedy Layer-Wise Training into Time Dimension Data Mining (ICDM), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Viktor Losing, Barbara Hammer, and Heiko Wersing. 2016. KNN Classifier with Self Adjusting Memory for Heterogeneous Concept Drift ICDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Haobo Lyu, Hui Lu, and Lichao Mou 2016. Learning a Transferable Change Rule from a Recurrent Neural Network for Land Cover Change Detection. Remote Sensing (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Guruprasad Nayak, Varun Mithal, and Vipin Kumar. 2016. Multiple Instance Learning for burned area mapping using multi -temporal reflectance data. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohammad Norouzi, Mani Ranjbar, and Greg Mori. 2009. Stacks of convolutional restricted boltzmann machines for shift-invariant feature learning CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mark Palatucci, Dean Pomerleau, Geoffrey E Hinton, and Tom M Mitchell 2009. Zero-shot learning with semantic output codes. In Advances in neural information processing systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. RACHAEL Petersen, ED Goldman, N Harris, S Sargent, D Aksenov, A Manisha, and others 2016. Mapping tree plantations with multispectral imagery: preliminary results for seven tropical countries. WRI (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Roger A Pielke. 2005. Land use and climate change. In Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tobias Sauter, Björn Weitzenkamp, and Christoph Schneider. 2010. Spatio-temporal prediction of snow cover in the Black Forest mountain range using remote sensing and a recurrent neural network. International Journal of Climatology (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Richard Socher, Milind Ganjoo, Christopher D Manning, and Andrew Ng 2013. Zero-shot learning through cross-modal transfer. Advances in neural information processing systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin Sundermeyer, Ralf Schlüter, and Hermann Ney. 2012. LSTM Neural Networks for Language Modeling.. In Interspeech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Qiong Wu, Hong-qing Li, Ru-song Wang, Juergen Paulussen, Yong He, Min Wang, Bi-hui Wang, and Zhen Wang. 2006. Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS. Landscape and urban planning (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Guangxu Xun, Xiaowei Jia, Vishrawas Gopalakrishnan, and Aidong Zhang 2016. A Survey on Context Learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Joe Yue-Hei Ng, Matthew Hausknecht, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Oriol Vinyals, Rajat Monga, and George Toderici 2015. Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification IEEE CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Incremental Dual-memory LSTM in Land Cover Prediction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '17: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
      August 2017
      2240 pages
      ISBN:9781450348874
      DOI:10.1145/3097983

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 August 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '17 Paper Acceptance Rate64of748submissions,9%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader