skip to main content
10.1145/3105726.3105736acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Growth Mindset in Computational Thinking Teaching and Teacher Training

Published:14 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Teacher training in computational thinking is becoming more and more important, as many countries are introducing it at all K-12 school levels. Introductory programming courses are known to be difficult and some studies suggest they foster a fixed-mindset views of intelligence, reinforcing the idea that only some people have the so called "geek gene". This is particularly dangerous if thought by future school teachers. Interventions to stimulate "CS growth mindset" in students and their teachers are fundamental and worth CS education research.

References

  1. Jo Boaler. 2013. Ability and mathematics: the mindset revolution that is reshaping education. In Forum, Vol. 55. Symposium Journals, 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Isabella Corradini, Michael Lodi, and Enrico Nardelli. 2017. Computational thinking in Italian Schools: Quantitative Data and Teachers' Sentiment Analysis after Two Years of "Programma il Futuro" Project (ITiCSE '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Isabella Corradini, Michael Lodi, and Enrico Nardelli. 2017. Conceptions and Misconceptions about Computational thinking among Italian Primary School Teachers (ICER '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Quintin Cutts, Emily Cutts, Stephen Draper, Patrick O'Donnell, and Peter Saffrey. 2010. Manipulating mindset to positively influence introductory programming performance. SIGCSE '10 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Carol S Dweck. 2000. Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Carol S Dweck. 2008. Mindsets and Math/Science Achievement. The Opportunity Equation (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Abraham E. Flanigan, Markeya S. Peteranetz, Duane F. Shell, and Leen-Kiat Soh. 2015. Exploring Changes in Computer Science Students' Implicit theories of Intelligence Across the Semester. ICER '15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2787622.2787722Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Catherine Good, Aneeta Rattan, and Carol S. Dweck. 2012. Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102, 4 (2012), 700--717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Colleen M. Lewis, Ruth E. Anderson, and Ken Yasuhara. 2016. "I Don't Code All Day". ICER '16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960332Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Elizabeth Patitsas, Jesse Berlin, Michelle Craig, and Steve Easterbrook. 2016. Evidence that Computer Science Grades Are Not Bimodal (ICER '16). ACM, NY, USA, 9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Beth Simon, Brian Hanks, Laurie Murphy, Sue Fitzgerald, Renee McCauley, Lynda Thomas, and Carol Zander. 2008. Saying isn't necessarily believing. ICER '08 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1404520.1404537Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jeannette M. Wing. 2006. Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (March 2006), 33--35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jeannette M. Wing. 2010. Computational thinking: What and Why? Link Magazine (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Growth Mindset in Computational Thinking Teaching and Teacher Training

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICER '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
          August 2017
          316 pages
          ISBN:9781450349680
          DOI:10.1145/3105726

          Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 August 2017

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          ICER '17 Paper Acceptance Rate29of180submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          ICER 2024
          ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
          August 13 - 15, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader