skip to main content
10.1145/3109761.3158409acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A new approach for multi-biometric fusion based on subjective logic

Published:17 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Biometric verification systems have to address many practical requirements, such as performance, presentation attack detection (PAD), large population coverage, demographic diversity, and varied deployment environment. Traditional unimodal biometric systems do not fully meet the aforementioned requirements making them vulnerable and susceptible to different types of attacks. In response to that, modern biometric systems combine multiple biometric modalities at different fusion levels, such as sensor, feature, score and decision level. The fused score is decisive to classify an unknown user as a genuine or impostor. In this paper, we describe a new biometric fusion framework based on Subjective Logic (SL); a type of probabilistic logic that explicitly takes uncertainty and trust into consideration. We principally evaluate our proposed fusion framework using two modalities, namely iris and fingerprint. Furethermore, the individual scores obtained from various comparators are combined at score level by applying four score fusion approaches (minimum score, maximum score, simple sum, and subjective logic) and three score normalization techniques (min-max, z-score, hyperbolic tangent). The experimental results show that the proposed score level fusion approach (subjective logic) gives the best authentication accuracy even when particular biometric classifiers give distinct comparison scores.

References

  1. B. Bhanu and V. Govindaraju. 2011. Multibiometrics for Human Identification. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.no/books?id=aqXD3iBuQewC Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2009. CASIA-Lamp Image Database V4.0. Technical Report. http://biometrics.idealtest.org/dbDetailForUser.do?id=4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Vincenzo Conti, Giovanni Milici, Patrizia Ribino, Filippo Sorbello, and Salvatore Vitabile. 2007. Fuzzy Fusion in Multimodal Biometric Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 108--115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mohammad Derawi, Davrondzhon Gafurov, and Rasmus Larsen. 2010. Fusion of Gait and Fingerprint For User Authentication on Mobile Devices. (IWSCN), 2010 2nd (2010). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5497989Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Anil Jain, Karthik Nandakumar, and Arun Ross. 2005. Score Normalization in Multimodal Biometric Systems. Pattern Recognition 38, 12 (dec 2005), 2270--2285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Anil K Jain, R. Bolle, S. Pankanti, Arun A Ross, and Karthik Nandakumar. 2011. Introduction to Biometrics. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anil K. Jain and Arun Ross. 2004. Multibiometric Systems. Commun. ACM 47, 1 (jan 2004), 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Jøsang. 2008. Conditional Reasoning with Subjective Logic. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing 15, 1 (2008), 5--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Audun Jøsang. 2016. Subjective Logic: A Formalism For Reasoning Under Uncertainty. Springer, Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Audun Jøsang and Robin Hankin. 2012. Interpretation and Fusion of Hyper-Opinions in Subjective Logic. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION 2012). IEEE, Los Alamitos.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dakshina Ranjan Kisku, P Gupta, H Mehrotra, and J Sing. 2009. Multimodal Belief Fusion for Face and Ear Biometrics. Intelligent Information Management 01, December (2009), 166--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. L. I. Kuncheva, C. J. Whitaker, C. A. Shipp, and R. P. W. Duin. 2000. Is Independence Good For Combining Classifiers?. In Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000, Vol. 2. 168--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. CW Lau, Bin Ma, HML Meng, YS Moon, and Yeung Yam. 2004. Fuzzy Logic Decision Fusion in a Multimodal Biometric System. Interspeech (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Davide Maltoni, Dario Maio, Anil K A.K. Jain, and Salil Prabhakar. 2009. Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition (2nd ed.). Number ISBN: 978-1-84882-253-5. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. N. Morizet and J. Gilles. 2008. A New Adaptive Combination Approach to Score Level Fusion for Face and Iris Biometrics Combining Wavelets and Statistical Moments. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Visual Computing (Advances in Visual Computing) (LNCS), G. Bebis (Ed.), Vol. 5359. 661--671. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Neurotechnology. 2017. MegaMatcher Automated Biometric Identification System for national-scale projects. (2017). http://www.neurotechnology.com/megamatcher-abis.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jialiang Peng, Ahmed A. Abd El-Latif, Qiong Li, and Xiamu Niu. 2014. Multimodal Biometric Authentication Based on Score Level Fusion of Finger Biometrics. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 125, 23 (dec 2014), 6891--6897.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R Raghavendra, A Rao, and G Hemantha Kumar. 2009. A Novel Approach for Multimodal Biometric Score Fusion Using Gaussian Mixture Model and Monte Carlo Method. Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing, 2009. ARTCom '09. International Conference on (2009), 90--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A.A. Ross, K. Nandakumar, and A.K. Jain. 2006. Handbook of Multibiometrics. Springer Science and Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Arun A Ross, Karthik Nandakumar, and Anil K Jain. 2006. Handbook of Multibiometrics (1st ed.). Number ISBN-13: 978-0-387--22296-7. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. ISO Standards. {n.d.}. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 37 Biometrics: SC 37 Standing Document 11 (SD 11), Part 1 Harmonization Document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. K. Vishi and S.Y. Yayilgan. 2013. Multimodal Biometric Authentication Using Fingerprint and Iris Recognition in Identity Management. In Proceedings - 2013 9th International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, IIH-MSP 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. Walley. 1996. Inferences from Multinomial Data: Learning about a Bag of Marbles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 58, 1 (1996), 3--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Franziska Wolf, Tobias Scheidat, and Claus Vielhauer. 2006. Study of Applicability of Virtual Users in Evaluating Multimodal Biometrics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 554--561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yilong Yin, Lili Liu, and Xiwei Sun. 2011. SDUMLA-HMT: A Multimodal Biometric Database. Biometric Recognition (2011), 260--268. http://www.springerlink.com/index/WLW15R838508UV51.pdf Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A new approach for multi-biometric fusion based on subjective logic

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              IML '17: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Internet of Things and Machine Learning
              October 2017
              581 pages
              ISBN:9781450352437
              DOI:10.1145/3109761

              Copyright © 2017 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 17 October 2017

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader