skip to main content
10.1145/3109859.3109902acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effective User Interface Designs to Increase Energy-efficient Behavior in a Rasch-based Energy Recommender System

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

People often struggle to find appropriate energy-saving measures to take in the household. Although recommender studies show that tailoring a system's interaction method to the domain knowledge of the user can increase energy savings, they did not actually tailor the conservation advice itself. We present two large user studies in which we support users to make an energy-efficient behavioral change by presenting tailored energy-saving advice. Both systems use a one-dimensional, ordinal Rasch scale, which orders 79 energy-saving measures on their behavioral difficulty and link this to a user's energy-saving ability for tailored advice. We established that recommending Rasch-based advice can reduce a user's effort, increase system support and, in turn, increase choice satisfaction and lead to the adoption of more energy-saving measures. Moreover, follow-up surveys administered four weeks later point out that tailoring advice on its feasibility can support behavioral change.

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. and Rothengatter, T. 2005. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 25, 3 (Sep. 2005), 273--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. and Rothengatter, T. 2007. The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 27, 4 (2007), 265--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Benders, R. M. J., Kok, R., Moll, H. C., Wiersma, G. and Noorman, K. J. 2006. New approaches for household energy conservation - In search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. Energy Policy. 34, 18 (Dec. 2006), 3612--3622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. eds. 2012. Influencing Individually: Fusing Personalization and Persuasion. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2, 2 (Jun. 2012), 9:1--9:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bond, T. G. and Fox, C. M. 2006. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Second Edition. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Boudet, H. S., Flora, J. A. and Armel, K. C. 2016. Clustering household energy-saving behaviours by behavioural attribute. Energy Policy. 92, (May 2016), 444--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cialdini, R. B. 2007. Influence: the psychology of persuasion. Collins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cialdini, R. B. and Trost, M. R. 1998. Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. The handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed.). D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, eds. McGraw-Hill. 151--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosley, D., Lam, S. K., Albert, I., Konstan, J. A. and Riedl, J. 2003. Is Seeing Believing? How Recommender System Interfaces Affect Users' Opinions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2003), 585--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Costanzo, M., Archer, D., Aronson, E. and Pettigrew, T. 1986. Energy conservation behavior: The difficult path from information to action. American Psychologist. 41, 5 (1986), 521--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Darby, S. 1999. Energy advice - what is it worth. Proceedings, European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Summer Study, paper III. 5, (1999), 3--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C. and Vandenbergh, M. P. 2009. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106, 44 (Nov. 2009), 18452--18456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ekstrand, M. D., Harper, F. M., Willemsen, M. C. and Konstan, J. A. 2014. User Perception of Differences in Recommender Algorithms. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 161--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ekstrand, M. D. and Willemsen, M. C. 2016. Behaviorism is Not Enough: Better Recommendations Through Listening to Users. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 221--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Embretson, S. E. and Reise, S. P. 2000. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fogg, B. J. 2002. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gardner, G. T. and Stern, P. C. 2008. The short list: The most effective actions US households can take to curb climate change. Environment: science and policy for sustainable development. 50, 5 (2008), 12--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Harper, F. M., Li, X., Chen, Y. and Konstan, J. A. 2005. An Economic Model of User Rating in an Online Recommender System. SpringerLink (Jul. 2005), 307--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kaiser, F. G., Byrka, K. and Hartig, T. 2010. Reviving Campbell's Paradigm for Attitude Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 14, 4 (Nov. 2010), 351--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kaiser, F. G. and Wilson, M. 2004. Goal-directed conservation behavior: the specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences. 36, 7 (May 2004), 1531--1544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B. and Aarts, E. 2015. Personalizing persuasive technologies: Explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 77, (May 2015), 38--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Karlin, B., Davis, N., Sanguinetti, A., Gamble, K., Kirkby, D. and Stokols, D. 2014. Dimensions of Conservation Exploring Differences Among Energy Behaviors. Environment and Behavior. 46, 4 (May 2014), 423--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Knijnenburg, B. P., Sivakumar, S. and Wilkinson, D. 2016. Recommender Systems for Self-Actualization. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 11--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Knijnenburg, B. P., Willemsen, M. and Broeders, R. 2014. Smart sustainability through system satisfaction: Tailored preference elicitation for energy-saving recommenders. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (Georgia, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Knijnenburg, B. P. and Willemsen, M. C. 2015. Evaluating recommender systems with user experiments. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer. 309--352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Knijnenburg, B. P., Willemsen, M. C., Gantner, Z., Soncu, H. and Newell, C. 2012. Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 22, 4--5 (2012), 441--504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mankoff, J., Matthews, D., Fussell, S. R. and Johnson, M. 2007. Leveraging Social Networks To Motivate Individuals to Reduce Their Ecological Footprints. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Washington, DC, USA, 2007), 87--. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. McKenzie-Mohr, D. 2000. Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist. 55, 5 (2000), 531--537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. McMakin, A. H., Malone, E. L. and Lundgren, R. E. 2002. Motivating Residents to Conserve Energy without Financial Incentives. Environment and Behavior. 34, 6 (Nov. 2002), 848--863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Petkov, P., Goswami, S., Köbler, F. and Krcmar, H. 2012. Personalised Eco-feedback As a Design Technique for Motivating Energy Saving Behaviour at Home. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 587--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Petkov, P., Köbler, F., Foth, M., Medland, R. and Krcmar, H. 2011. Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison. CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 1945--1950. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Radha, M., Willemsen, M. C., Boerhof, M. and IJsselsteijn, W. A. 2016. Lifestyle Recommendations for Hypertension Through Rasch-based Feasibility Modeling. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 239--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rashid, A. M., Albert, I., Cosley, D., Lam, S. K., McNee, S. M., Konstan, J. A. and Riedl, J. 2002. Getting to Know You: Learning New User Preferences in Recommender Systems. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (New York, NY, USA, 2002), 127--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Schultz, P. W. 2014. Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior: Lots of tools but few instructions. European Psychologist. 19, 2 (2014), 107--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Starke, A., Willemsen, M. C. and Snijders, C. 2015. Saving Energy in 1-D: Tailoring Energy-saving Advice Using a Rasch-based Energy Recommender System. Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Decision Making and Rec. Sys. (DMRS) (Bolzano, Italy, 2015), 5--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Steg, L. 2008. Promoting household energy conservation. Energy policy. 36, 12 (2008), 4449--4453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Tintarev, N. and Masthoff, J. 2007. A Survey of Explanations in Recommender Systems. 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop (Apr. 2007), 801--810. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Urban, J. and Ščasny, M. 2014. Structure of Domestic Energy Saving: How Many Dimensions? Environment and Behavior. (2014), 13916514547081.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, C. and Dowlatabadi, H. 2007. Models of Decision Making and Residential Energy Use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 32, 1 (2007), 169--203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Winett, R. A., Love, S. Q. and Kidd, C. 1982. Effectiveness of an energy specialist and extension agents in promoting summer energy conservation by home visits. J. Environ. Syst.; (United States). 12, 1 (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Effective User Interface Designs to Increase Energy-efficient Behavior in a Rasch-based Energy Recommender System

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                RecSys '17: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
                August 2017
                466 pages
                ISBN:9781450346528
                DOI:10.1145/3109859

                Copyright © 2017 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 27 August 2017

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                RecSys '17 Paper Acceptance Rate26of125submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

                Upcoming Conference

                RecSys '24
                18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
                October 14 - 18, 2024
                Bari , Italy

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader