A Conceptual Framework for Designing Virtual Heritage Environment for Cultural Learning

Abstract

Virtual environment has the potential to be used as a medium to facilitate cultural learning. However, this requires guidelines on how to design the environment. This article provides a conceptual framework that guides the design of a virtual environment that facilitates cultural learning for casual users. The exploratory sequential mixed-method design approach was used as the basis for the overall research design. Five studies involving experts and end users were performed to identify and evaluate the framework components. The framework consists of four important components: (i) Information Design, (ii) Information Presentation, (iii) Navigation Mechanism, and (iv) Environment Setting, and outlines two types of design elements: basic elements, which are essential for cultural learning to take place, and extended elements, which provide options for enhanced user experience. Results from the framework evaluation suggest that the proposed design elements are useful in facilitating learning and that the experience of using the virtual environment affected the end users’ sense of awareness and appreciation toward heritage value and preservation.

References

1. Y. E. Kalay. 2008. Preserving cultural heritage through digital media. In New Heritage: New Media and Cultural Heritage, Y. E. Kalay, T. Kvan, and J. Affleck (Eds). Routledge, 1–10.
2. B.-K. Tan and H. Rahaman. 2009. Virtual heritage: Reality and criticism. In Proceedings of the 13th International CAAD Futures Conference, Joining Languages, Cultures and Visions/Joindre Langages, Cultures et Visions (CAADFutures’09). Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal. Montréal.
3. N. Ibrahim, N. M. Ali, and N. F. M. Yatim. 2015. Factors facilitating cultural learning in virtual architectural heritage environments: End-user perspective. J. Comput. Cult. Herit, 8, 1--20.
4. H. Rahaman and B.-K. Tan. 20111. Interpreting digital heritage: A conceptual model with end-users' perspective. Int. J. Architect. Comput. 9, 99–114.
5. E. Bonini. 2008. Building virtual cultural heritage environments: The embodied mind at the core of the learning processes. Int. J. Dig. Cult. Electron. Tourism, 1, 113--125.
6. J. B. Madsen and C. B. Madsen. 2015. Handheld visual representation of a castle chapel ruin. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 9, 1–18.
7. D. Koller, B. Frischer, and G. Humphreys. 2010. Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 2, 1--17.
8. R. Stone and T. Ojika. 2000. Virtual heritage: What next? IEEE Trans. Multimedia 7, 73--74.
9. E. Champion. 2008. Explorative shadow realms of uncertain histories. In New Heritage: New media and cultural heritage, K. Yehuda E. K. Thomas, and J. Affleck (Eds.) Routledge, London, 185--206.
10. J. Zara and P. Slavik. 2003. Cultural heritage presentation in virtual environment: Czech experience. In Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. 92--96.
11. M. Trapp, A. Semmo, R. Pokorski, C.-D. Herrmann, J. Döllner, M. Eichhorn, and M. Heinzelmann. 2010. Communication of digital cultural heritage in public spaces by the example of roman cologne. In Digital Heritage, M. Ioannides, D. Fellner, A. Georgopoulos, and D. Hadjimitsis (Eds.), Springer, Berlin. 262--276.
12. A. Rafi, A. Salleh, A. Paul, S. Noraisah, J. Yee, R. Hanif, and M. Mahadzir. 2010. Modeling optimization for real-time virtual heritage visualization content: A research on e-Warisan SENIBINA. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology (ITSim’10). 1--7.
13. M. Haesen, J. De Boeck, K. Coninx, and C. Raymaekers. 2009. An interactive coal mine museum visit: Prototyping the user experience. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI'09). 546--553.
14. G. Conti, S. Piffer, G. Girardi, R. D. Amicis, and G. Ucelli. 2006. Dentrotrento: A virtual walk across history. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM. 318--321.
15. J. Feng, X. Feng, X. Liu, and J. Peng. 2016. The virtual wandering system of Han Chang'an City based on information recommendation. In Proceedings of the Symposium on VR Culture and Heritage, Volume 2. ACM, 75--78.
16. F. Bellotti, E. Ferretti, and A. Gloria. 2005. Discovering the european heritage through the chikho educational web game. In Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment, M. Maybury, O. Stock, and W. Wahlster (Eds). Springer, Berlin, 13--22.
17. L. Wang, J.-W. Guo, C.-L. Yang, H.-S. Zhao, and X.-X. Meng. 2010. O3D-based game learning environments for cultural heritage online education. In Entertainment for Education. X. Zhang, S. Zhong, Z. Pan, K. Wong, and R. Yun (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, 417--428.
18. L. T. D. Paolis, G. Aloisio, M. G. Celentano, L. Oliva, and P. Vecchio. 2010. A game-based 3D simulation of otranto in the middle ages. In Proceedings of the 2010 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions. IEEE Computer Society, 130--133.
19. E. Champion and D. Bharat. 2007. Dialing up the past. In Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. F. Cameron and S. Kenderdine (Eds.), MIT Press: Media in Transition series, 333--348.
20. E. Champion. 2006. Evaluating cultural learning in an online virtual environment. Int. J. Contin. Eng. Edu. Life Long Learn. 16, 173--182.
21. E. Champion. 2006. Playing with a career in ruins: Game design and virtual heritage. In Proceedings of the Conference on Learning in Cyberspace: New Media for Heritage Didactics and Interpretation (VIè Seminari Arqueologia i Ensenyament Conference). Centre d’Estudis del Patrimoni Arquelògic de la Prehistoria, and the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. 45--61.
22. F. Okura, M. Kanbara, and N. Yokoya. 2015. Mixed-reality world exploration using image-based rendering. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 8, 1--26.
23. I. Pedersen, N. Gale, P. Mirza-Babaei, and S. Reid. 2017. More than meets the eye: The benefits of augmented reality and holographic displays for digital cultural heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 10 (2017), 1--15.
24. A. C. Addison. 2000. Emerging trends in virtual heritage. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 7, 22--25.
25. J. Jacobsen and L. Holden. 2007. Virtual heritage: Living in the past. Techné: Res. Philos. Technol. J. Soc. Philos. Technol. 10.
26. M. Ott and F. Pozzi. 2008. ICT and cultural heritage education: Which added value? In Emerging Technologies and Information Systems for the Knowledge Society, M. Lytras, J. Carroll, E. Damiani, and R. Tennyson (Eds). Springer, Berlin, 131--138.
27. L. Pujol and E. Champion. 2012. Evaluating presence in cultural heritage projects. Int. J. Herit. Studies 18 (2012), 83--102.
28. J. Affleck and K. Thomas. 2005. Reinterpreting virtual heritage. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia. 169--178.
29. J. Affleck and T. Kvan. 2008. Memory capsules: Discursive interpretation of cultural heritage through new media. In New Heritage: New Media and Cultural Heritage, K. Yehuda E, K. Thomas, and A. Janice (Eds). Routledge.
30. F. Tilden, R. B. Craig, and R. E. Dickenson. 2008. Interpreting our heritage. The University of North Carolina Press, 4th ed.
31. S. H. Ham. 2013. Interpretation—Making a Difference on Purpose. Fulcrum Publishing, Colorado.
32. J. Veverka. 1998. Interpretive Master Planning. Acorn Naturalist, Tuscin, CA.
33. B. Lord. 2007. What is museum-based learning? In The Manual of Museum Learning, B. Lord (Ed). Altamira Press, Plymouth, 13--19.
34. E. Hooper-Greenhill. 2007. Museums and Education: Purpose, Pedagogy, Performance. Routledge, Abingdon, 2007.
35. D. L. Larsen. 2011. Meaningful Interpretation: How to connect heart and minds to places. Objects and other resources. In Eastern National, 2nd ed., 242.
36. A. B. Juliana Aida, P. S. Jahnkassim, and M. Mahmud. 2013. User requirements for virtual reality in architectural heritage learning. Int. J. Interact. Dig. Media 1, 37--45.
37. J. W. Creswell and V. L. P. Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications. 2011.
38. B. Glaser and A. L. Strauss. 1976. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.
39. R. Kumar. 1996. Research Method—A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. SAGE Publications, London.
40. E.-T. Powell and M. Renner. 2003. Analyzing qualitative data. In Program Development and Evaluation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
41. G. W. Ryan and H. R. Bernard. 2003. Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods 15, 85--109.
42. M. Dixon-Woods, S. Agarwal, D. Jones, B. Young, and A. Sutton. 2005. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 10, 45--53B.
43. S. Sukamolson. 2005. Fundamentals of quantitative research. E-J. Research. Teachers (EJRT), 2 (2005).
44. V. Braun and V. Clarke. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitat. Res. Psychol. 3, 77--101.
45. A. J. Onwuegbuzie and N. L. Leech. 2007. Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. Qualitat. Rep. 12, 238--254.
46. B. Folkestad. 2008. Analysing Interview data possibilities and challenges. In Eurosphere Online Working Paper Series No. 13.
47. C. B. Seaman. 2008. Qualitative methods. In Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, F. Shull, J. Singer, and D. I. K. Sjoberg (Eds). Springer, 35--62.
48. M. Borrego, E. P. Douglas, and C. T. Amelink. 2009. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. J. Eng. Edu. 98, 53--66.
49. Y. Zhang and B. M. Wildemuth. 2009. Qualitative analysis of content. In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science Libraries Unlimited, B. Wildemuth (Ed). Westport, CT, 308--319.
50. Y. Zhang and B. M. Wildemuth. 2009. Unstructured interviews. In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science Libraries Unlimited, B. Wildemuth (Ed). Westport, CT, 222--231.
51. N. Van Note Chism, E. Douglas, and W. J. Hilson Jr. 2008. Qualitative research basics: A guide for engineering educators. National Science Foundation.
52. D. W. Turner. 2010. Qualitative Interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. Qualitat. Rep. 15.
53. D. Silverman. 2011. Interpreting Qualitative Data, 4th ed. SAGE Publications.
54. S. M. Kolb. 2012. Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. J. Emerg. Trends Edu. Res. Policy Studies 3 83--86.
55. A. Tweed and K. Charmaz. 2012. Grounded theory methods for mental health practitioners. In Grounded Theory Methods for Mental Health Practitioners, A. R. Harper and D. Thompson (Eds). John Wiley 8 Sons, West Sussex, 131--146.
56. C. J. Watling and L. Lingard. 2012. Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70. Med. Teacher 34, 850--861.
57. Ahmad Rafi, Azhar Salleh, Avijit Paul, Reza maulana, Faisal Athar, and G. Pratiniyata. 2010. E-warisan senibina: Towards a collaborative architectural virtual heritage experience. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe’10). 602--609.
58. A. Leftridge. 2006. Interpretive writing. InterpPress.
59. L. Brochu and T. Merriman. 2008. Personal interpretation—Connecting your audience to heritage resource. InterpPress, 2nd ed.
60. P. Caputo, S. Lewis, and L. Brochu. 2008. Interpretation by design: Graphic design basic for heritage interpreters. InterpPress.
61. J. Griffin, L. Kelly, G. Savage, and J. Hatherly. 2005. Museums actively researching visitor experiences and learning (MARVEL): A methodological study. Open Museum J. 7 (2005).
62. L. J. Kelly. 2007. The Interrelationships Between Adult Museum Visitors’ Learning Identities and Their Museum Experiences. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Technology, Sydney.
63. S. H. Ham and B. Weiler. 2006. Development of a Research-based Tool for Evaluating Interpretation. Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism.
64. B. Weiler and S. H. Ham. 2010. Development of a research instrument for evaluating the visitor outcomes of face-to-face interpretation. Visitor Studies 13, 187--205.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms

      • Virtual reality