skip to main content
10.1145/3123024.3124412acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TweetCount: urban insights by counting tweets

Published:11 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper characterizes an urban region using time series of geotagged tweet counts. Time series are constructed for each cell in a rectangular grid. We show how simple, anonymous tweet counts in the cells can be used to classify the cells into urban land use profiles based on the number of residences and businesses. We discover that Twitter activity for a certain short time of day is especially indicative of a region's profile. We go on to analyze the cells and profiles in a novel way by looking at their ability to predict tweet counts in other parts of the region.

References

  1. Handy, S.L., et al., How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. American journal of preventive medicine, 2002. 23(2): p. 64--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ewing, R., et al., Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity, in Urban Ecology. 2008, Springer. p. 567--582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Smith, A., U.S. Smartphone Use in 2015, 2015, Pew Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Froehlich, J., et al., Voting with your feet: An investigative study of the relationship between place visit behavior and preference, in Eighth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2006)2006, Springer: Orange County, California, USA. p. 333--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Liao, L., D. Fox, and H. Kautz, Extracting places and activities from gps traces using hierarchical conditional random fields. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2007. 26(1): p. 119--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Krumm, J., R. Caruana, and S. Counts, Learning likely locations, in Twenty-First Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP 2013)2013, Springer: Rome, Italy. p. 64--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Pan, G., et al., Land-use classification using taxi GPS traces. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 2013. 14(1): p. 113--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hossain, N., et al., Precise Localization of Homes and Activities: Detecting Drinking-While-Tweeting Patterns in Communities, in 10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM-16)2016. Cologne, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sadilek, A., et al. Deploying nEmesis: Preventing Foodborne Illness by Data Mining Social Media. in Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI 2016). 2016. Phoenix, Arizona USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sadilek, A., H.A. Kautz, and V. Silenzio. Predicting disease transmission from geo-tagged micro-blog data. in Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2012). 2012. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Abdelhaq, H., C. Sengstock, and M. Gertz, Eventweet: Online localized event detection from twitter. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2013. 6(12): p. 1326--1329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Krumm, J. and E. Horvitz, Eyewitness: identifying local events via space-time signals in Twitter feeds, in Twenty-Third International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL 2015)2015: Seattle, Washington USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Steiger, E., et al., Twitter as an indicator for whereabouts of people? Correlating Twitter with UK census data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2015. 54: p. 255--265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Arribas-Bel, D., et al., Cyber Cities: Social Media as a Tool for Understanding Cities. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 2015. 8(3): p. 231--247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cranshaw, J. and T. Yano. Seeing a home away from the home: Distilling proto-neighborhoods from incidental data with latent topic modeling. in CSSWC Workshop at NIPS. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Cranshaw, J., et al. The livehoods project: Utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city. in 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2012. Dublin, Ireland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Noulas, A., et al., Exploiting semantic annotations for clustering geographic areas and users in location-based social networks, in AAAI Workshop on the Social Mobile Web2011. p. 32--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrari, L., et al. Extracting urban patterns from location-based social networks. in 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location-Based Social Networks. 2011. Chicago, Illinois USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Morstatter, F., et al., Is the sample good enough? comparing data from twitter's streaming api with twitter's firehose, in Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2013)2013: Boston, Massachusetts, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Watanabe, K., et al. Jasmine: a real-time local-event detection system based on geolocation information propagated to microblogs. in Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Friedman, J.H., Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 2001. 29(5): p. 1189--1232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Min, W. and L. Wynter, Real-time road traffic prediction with spatio-temporal correlations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011. 19(4): p. 606--616.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Barthélemy, M., B. Gondran, and E. Guichard, Large scale cross-correlations in Internet traffic. Physical Review E, 2002. 66(5): p. 056110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lütkepohl, H., New introduction to multiple time series analysis. 2005: Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. TweetCount: urban insights by counting tweets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      September 2017
      1089 pages
      ISBN:9781450351904
      DOI:10.1145/3123024

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 September 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader