skip to main content
10.1145/3125433.3125461acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesopencollabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social Identity and Social Media Activities in Equity Crowdfunding

Published:23 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The existence of crowdfunding platforms has helped creators to bring their innovative products to market. In recent years, equity crowdfunding has increased in popularity as an alternative form of finance, and has helped thousands of innovating entrepreneurs to raise money, and join a broader conversation with large numbers of potential investors. Early-stage startup investment is no longer restricted to venture capital firms and high net worth angel investors. Using Social Identity Theory (SIT) as a basis, we look at a sample of crowdfunding campaigns from the UK-based platform, Crowdcube. In this study we are trying to understand how groups of potential crowdfunding investors act in relation to the social media activities of those campaigns. We examine how different social media activities of can have an impact upon the funding of a crowdfunding campaign. This study has significant implications for fundraisers who want to utilize social media to increase their chances of a successful crowdfunding campaign. In our study we identify that by being more active on social media, and having a higher level of engagement with the crowd, this will have a positive impact on the overall funding of a crowdfunding campaign.

References

  1. Aaker, J. and Akutsu, S. (2009). "Why do people give? The role of identity in giving." Journal of Consumer Psychology 19(3), pp. 267--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Agarwal, Ritu, Anil K. Gupta, and Robert Kraut. (2008) "Editorial overview --- The interplay between digital and social networks." Information Systems Research 19(3):243--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715--753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Assadi, D. (2015). Strategic approaches to successful crowdfunding. IGI Global, pp. 154--163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bannerman, S., 2013. "Crowdfunding culture." Journal of Mobile Media 7(01), pp. 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, C. (2015). Trends Show Crowdfunding to Surpass VC in 2016. {online} Forbes.com. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/chancebarnett/2015/06/09/trends-show-crowdfunding-to-surpass-vc-in-2016/#1b3ae3874547 {Accessed 21 Apr. 2017}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. and Schwienbacher, A. (2014). "Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd." Journal of Business Venturing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. 1st ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradford, C. (2012). "Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws." Columbia Business Law Review, pp. 1--150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). "Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships." Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(1), 12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). "Organizational images and member identification." Administrative science quarterly, 239--263.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Enders, A., Hungenberg, H., Denker, H. P., & Mauch, S. (2008). "The long tail of social networking: Revenue models of social networking sites." European Management Journal, 26(3), 199--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (2014). "The FCA's regulatory approach to crowdfunding over the internet, and the promotion of non-readily realisable securities by other media." Policy Statement 14.4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fink, A. (2012). "Protecting the crowd and raising capital through the JOBS Act." Available at SSRN 2046051.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gabison, Garry A. (2015) "Equity Crowdfunding: All Regulated But Not Equal." DePaul Business. & Commercial. Law Journal Vol. 13: 359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gefen, David, Detmar Straub, and Marie-Claude Boudreau. "Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice." Communications of the association for information systems 4.1 (2000)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerber, E.M. and Hui, J. (2013). "Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation." ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20(6), p. 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gleasure, R. and Feller, J. (2016a). "Emerging technologies and the democratisation of financial services: A metatriangulation of crowdfunding research." Information and Organization 26(4), pp. 101--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Gleasure, R., & Feller, J. (2016b). "A Rift in the Ground: Theorizing the Evolution of Anchor Values in Crowdfunding Communities through the Oculus Rift Case Study." Journal of the Association for Information Systems 17(10), 708--736.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Greenberg, M.D., Pardo, B., Hariharan, K. and Gerber, E. (2013). "Crowdfunding support tools: predicting success & failure." In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1815--1820). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Griffin, Z.J. (2012). "Crowdfunding: fleecing the American masses." Case W. Res. JL Tech. & Internet 4, p. 375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Henseler, Jörg, et al. "Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013)." Organizational Research Methods 17.2 (2014): 182--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffman, D. L., and Fodor, M. (2010). "Can You Measure the ROI of Your Social Media Marketing." MITSloan Management Review 52.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hogg, M. and Terry, D. (2000). "Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts." The Academy of Management Review 25(1), p.121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Howe, J. (2006). "The rise of crowdsourcing." Wired magazine, 14(6), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hughes, D., Rowe, M., Batey, M. and Lee, A. (2012). "A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage." Computers in Human Behavior 28(2), pp. 561--569. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kaplan, Andreas M., and Michael Haenlein. (2010) "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media." Business horizons 53.1 59--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Kromidha, E. and Robson, P. (2016). "Social identity and signalling success factors in online crowdfunding." Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, pp. 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Massolution, C. L. (2015). "Crowdfunding Industry Report."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. McLeod, S. (2008). "Social identity theory." Simply Psychology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. 1st ed. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitra, T. and Gilbert, E. (2014). "The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on kickstarter." In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 49--61). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mollick, E. (2014). "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study." Journal of business venturing 29(1), pp. 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Parvanta, C., Roth, Y. and Keller, H. (2013). "Crowdsourcing 101: A Few Basics to Make You the Leader of the Pack." Health Promotion Practice 14(2), pp. 163--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Rapp, A., Beitelspacher, L.S., Grewal, D. and Hughes, D.E. (2013). "Understanding social media effects across seller, retailer, and consumer interactions." Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 41(5), pp. 547--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Rishika, R, et al. (2013) "The effect of customers' social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: an empirical investigation." Information systems research 24(1): 108--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Stanko, M. and Henard, D. (2016). How Crowdfunding Influences Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwienbacher, A. and Larralde, B. (2012). "Crowdfunding of Small Entrepreneurial Ventures." In: Cumming, D., The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurial finance. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Stelzner, M.A. (2012). Social Media Marketing Industry Report: How Marketers Are Using Social Media To Grow Their Businesses. Social Media Examiner.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Stemler, A. (2013). "The JOBS Act and crowdfunding: Harnessing the power---and money---of the masses." Business Horizons 56(3), pp. 271--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1979). "An integrative theory of intergroup conflict." The social psychology of intergroup relations 33(47), p.74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner, J.C. and Tajfel, H. (1986). "The social identity theory of intergroup behavior." Psychology of intergroup relations, pp. 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Thies, F., Wessel, M., Rudolph, J. and Benlian, A. (2016). Personality Matters: How Signaling Personality Traits Can Influence the Adoption and Diffusion of Crowdfunding Campaigns. Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Trepte, S. and Krämer, N. (2008). "Expanding social identity theory for research in media effects: Two international studies and a theoretical model."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Waters, R.D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A. and Lucas, J. (2009). "Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook." Public relations review 35(2), pp.102- 106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Wilson, H.J., Guinan, P.J., Parise, S. and Weinberg, B.D. (2011). "What's your social media strategy." Harvard Business Review 89(7/8), pp. 23--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson, Karen E., and Marco Testoni. "Improving the role of equity crowdfunding in Europe's capital markets." (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OpenSym '17: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration
    August 2017
    218 pages
    ISBN:9781450351874
    DOI:10.1145/3125433

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 August 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate108of195submissions,55%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader