Design of IoT Tangibles for Primary Schools: A Case Study

ABSTRACT

Internet of things devices are already part of primary school children's living but their design or fabrication is often not part of their school education. Italian primary schools, in particular, bring their own restraints to the integration of their design. This paper explores how to bring the design of IoT tangibles to primary-school children and their educators. It narrates a workshop experience with a primary school class. This was on purpose conducted in an environment similar to their school, without typical fablab facilities. It was linked to the curriculum of the class: it asked children to create IoT tangibles related to socio-emotional learning. The workshop organised the fabrication in stages. Initially, it used paper-based generative toolkigs, which would make everybody feel on equal footing (children and teachers alike): Tiles-like cards and a conceptualisation framework. Then it progressively moved children into programming their own IoT tangibles for socio-emotional goals. The workshop gathered mixed data, mainly qualitative. The paper ends by reflecting on them and the entire experience.

References

1. Paulo Blikstein. 2015. Computationally Enhanced Toolkits for Children: Historical Review and a Framework for Future Design. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction 9, 1 (2015), 1--68.
2. P. Blikstein and D. Krannich. 2003. The Makers' Movement and FabLabs in Education. In Proceedings of IDC 2003.
3. P. Blikstein, A. Sipitakiat, J. Goldstein, J. Wilbert, M. Johnson, S. Vranakis, Z. Pedersen, and W. Carey. 2013. Project Bloks: designing a development platform for tangible programming for children. (2013).
4. Margherita Brondino, Gabriella Dodero, Rosella Gennari, Alessandra Melonio, Margherita Pasini, Daniela Raccanello, and Santina Torello. 2015. Emotions and Inclusion in Co-design at School: Let's Measure Them! Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1--8.
5. Nikolaus Correll, Chris Wailes, and Scott Slaby. 2014. A One-hour Curriculum to Engage Middle School Students in Robotics and Computer Science using Cubelets. In Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. Springer, 165--176.
6. Giuseppe Desolda, Carmelo Ardito, and Maristella Matera. 2017. Empowering End Users to Customize Their Smart Environments: Model, Composition Paradigms, and Domain-Specific Tools. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 24, 2, Article 12 (April 2017), 52 pages.
7. Tania Di Mascio, Rosella Gennari, Alessandra Melonio, and Laura Tarantino. 2014. Engaging "New Users" into Design Activities: The TERENCE Experience with Children. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 241--250.
8. Allison Druin, Jerry A. Fails, and Mona Leigh Guha. 2014. Including Children in Technology Design Processes: Techniques and Practices. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1021--1022.
9. Joseph A. Durlak, Roger P. Weissberg, Allison B. Dymnicki, Rebecca D. Taylor, and Kriston B. Schellinger. 2011. The Impact of Enhancing Student's Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions. Child Development 82, 1 (2011), 405--432.
10. Elizabeth Foss, Mona Leigh Guha, Panagis Papadatos, Tamara Clegg, Jason Yip, and Greg Walsh. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry Extended: Creating Technology with Middle School Students with Learning Differences. Journal of Special Education Technology 28, 3 (2013), 33--46. arXiv:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800303
11. R. Gennari, A. Melonio, D. Raccanello, M. Brondino, G. Dodero, M. Pasini, and S. Torello. 2017. Children's emotions and quality of products in participatory game design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 101 (2017), 45--61.
12. R. Gennari, A. Melonio, and M. Rizvi. 2017. The Participatory Design Process of Tangibles for Socio-Emotional Learning. Springer International Publishing, 167--182.
13. B. Johnson and L. Christensen. 2017. Educational Research. SAGE.
14. John Maloney, Mitchel Resnick, Natalie Rusk, Brian Silverman, and Evelyn Eastmond. 2010. The scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 10, 4 (2010), 16.
15. S. Mora, F. Gianni, and M. Divitini. 2017. Tiles: A Card-based Ideation Toolkit for the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems (DIS2017). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 587--598.
16. Janet C. Read and Stuart MacFarlane. 2006. Using the Fun Toolkit and Other Survey Methods to Gather Opinions in Child Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81--88.
17. Sam Labs. 2016. SAM Labs Education. (2016). https://www.samlabs.com/education.
18. TILES project. 2017. TILES web site. (2017). http://tilestoolkit.io/cards
19. Benjamin Wohl, Barry Porter, and Sarah Clinch. 2015. Teaching Computer Science to 5-7 year-olds: An initial study with Scratch, Cubelets and unplugged computing. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. ACM, 55--60.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Interaction design