skip to main content
10.1145/3126686.3126733acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SeeNav: Seamless and Energy-Efficient Indoor Navigation using Augmented Reality

Published:23 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Augmented Reality (AR) based navigation has emerged as an impressive, yet seamless way of guiding users in unknown environments. Its quality of experience depends on many factors, including the accuracy of camera pose estimation, response delay, and energy consumption. In this paper, we present SeeNav - a seamless and energy-efficient AR navigation system for indoor environments. SeeNav combines image-based localization and inertial tracking to provide an accurate and robust camera pose estimation. As vision processing is much more compute intensive than the processing of inertial sensor data, SeeNav offloads the former one from resource-constrained mobile devices to a cloud to improve tracking performance and reduce power consumption. More than that, SeeNav implements a context-aware task scheduling algorithm that further minimizes energy consumption while maintaining the accuracy of camera pose estimation. Our experimental results, including a user study, show that SeeNav provides seamless navigation experience and reduces the overall energy consumption by 21.56% with context-aware task scheduling.

References

  1. 2016. Pokemon GO Drains A LOT MORE Battery since the last update! https://pokemongohub.net/pokemon-go-drains-a-lot-more-battery-since-the-last-update/. (9 November 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Marzieh Jalal Abadi, Luca Luceri, Mahbub Hassan, Chun Tung Chou, and Monica Nicoli. 2014. A collaborative approach to heading estimation for smartphonebased PDR indoor localisation. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2014 International Conference on. IEEE, IEEE, 554--563.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Michael Abrash. 2017. After mixed year, mobile AR to drive $108 billion VR/AR market by 2021. http://www.digi-capital.com/news/2017/01/after-mixed-year-mobile-ar-to-drive-108-billion-vrar-market-by-2021/. (January 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clemens Arth and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2011. Challenges of large-scale augmented reality on smartphones. Graz University of Technology, Graz (2011), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeffrey R. Blum, Daniel G. Greencorn, and Jeremy R. Cooperstock. 2012. Smartphone sensor reliability for augmented reality applications. In International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking, and Services. Springer, 127--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jiang Dong, Yu Xiao, Marius Noreikis, Zhonghong Ou, and Antti Ylä-Jääski. 2015. imoon: Using smartphones for image-based indoor navigation. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 85--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Georg Gerstweiler, Emanuel Vonach, and Hannes Kaufmann. 2015. Hymotrack: A mobile AR navigation system for complex indoor environments. Sensors 16, 1 (2015), 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Alexandru Gherghina, Alexandru-Corneliu Olteanu, and Nicolae Tapus. 2013. A marker-based augmented reality system for mobile devices. In Roedunet International Conference (RoEduNet), 2013 11th. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jared Heinly, Johannes L. Schonberger, Enrique Dunn, and Jan-Michael Frahm. 2015. Reconstructing the world* in six days*(as captured by the yahoo 100 million image dataset). In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3287--3295.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yingjuan Hu, Xuewen Liao, Qian Lu, Shulin Xu, and Wei Zhu. 2016. A segment-based fusion algorithm of WiFingerprinting and pedestrian dead reckoning. In Communications in China (ICCC), 2016 IEEE/CIC International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Baoqi Huang, Guodong Qi, Xiaokun Yang, Long Zhao, and Han Zou. 2016. Exploiting cyclic features of walking for pedestrian dead reckoning with unconstrained smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 374--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jiung-Yao Huang, Su-Hui Lee, and Chung-Hsien Tsai. 2016. A fast image matching technique for the panoramic-based localization. In Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2016 IEEE/ACIS 15th International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Christian Koch, Matthias Neges, Markus König, and Michael Abramovici. 2014. Natural markers for augmented reality-based indoor navigation and facility maintenance. Automation in Construction 48 (2014), 18--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Fan Li, Chunshui Zhao, Guanzhong Ding, Jian Gong, Chenxing Liu, and Feng Zhao. 2012. A reliable and accurate indoor localization method using phone inertial sensors. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 421--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rensis Likert. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology (1932).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaikai Liu and Xiaolin Li. 2015. Enabling context-aware indoor augmented reality via smartphone sensing and vision tracking. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM) 12, 1s (2015), 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Zhenguang Liu, Luming Zhang, Qi Liu, Yifang Yin, Li Cheng, and Roger Zimmermann. 2017. Fusion of Magnetic and Visual Sensors for Indoor Localization: Infrastructure-Free and More Effective. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 19, 4 (2017), 874--888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F Landis Markley, Yang Cheng, John Lucas Crassidis, and Yaakov Oshman. 2007. Averaging quaternions. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 30, 4 (2007), 1193--1197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Alessandro Mulloni, Hartmut Seichter, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2011. Handheld augmented reality indoor navigation with activity-based instructions. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Karl Pauwels, Leonardo Rubio, and Eduardo Ros. 2016. Real-time pose detection and tracking of hundreds of objects. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 26, 12 (2016), 2200--2214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hollister Sean and Fleenor Rebecca. 2016. How Pokemon Go affects your phone's battery life and data. https://www.cnet.com/how-to/pokemon-go-battery-test-data-usage/. (13 July 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Guowei Shi and Ying Ming. 2016. Survey of Indoor Positioning Systems Based on Ultra-wideband (UWB) Technology. In Wireless Communications, Networking and Applications. Springer, 1269--1278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jonathan Ventura, Clemens Arth, Gerhard Reitmayr, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2014. Global localization from monocular slam on a mobile phone. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 20, 4 (2014), 531--539. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lauri Wirola, Tommi A Laine, and Jari Syrjärinne. 2010. Mass-market requirements for indoor positioning and indoor navigation. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2010 International Conference on. IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. R. G. Yudanto and F. Petr. 2015. Sensor fusion for indoor navigation and tracking of automated guided vehicles. In 2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. SeeNav: Seamless and Energy-Efficient Indoor Navigation using Augmented Reality

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              Thematic Workshops '17: Proceedings of the on Thematic Workshops of ACM Multimedia 2017
              October 2017
              558 pages
              ISBN:9781450354165
              DOI:10.1145/3126686

              Copyright © 2017 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 23 October 2017

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Upcoming Conference

              MM '24
              MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
              October 28 - November 1, 2024
              Melbourne , VIC , Australia

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader