Improving the usability of scientific software with participatory design: a new interface design for radio astronomy visualisation software

ABSTRACT

The importance of usability considerations in software development is well recognised. However, typically usability is not considered as an explicit goal in the development of scientific software, which is often done by developers with domain-specific knowledge but little formal software development training. In interactive software developed for international collaborations such as the Square Kilometre Array, usability is increasingly important. A possible solution is persistent collaboration between software developers and domain experts to design effective user interfaces. Here we carry out a User Centred participatory design approach to designing an astronomy visualisation interface. The methodology is iterative: in each iteration, a prototype interface was designed and then evaluated by users. Frequent consultation with domain experts produced an innovative design for an astronomy visualisation interface with improved usability.

References

1. Aaron Bangor, Philip T Kortum, and James T Miller. 2008. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 6 (2008), 574--594.
2. Susan M Baxter, Steven W Day, Jacquelyn S Fetrow, and Stephanie J Reisinger. 2006. Scientific Software Development Is Not an Oxymoron. PLoS Comput Biol 2, 9 (2006), e87.
3. U Becciani, A Costa, V Antonuccio-Delogu, G Caniglia, M Comparato, C Gheller, Z Jin, Mel Krokos, and P Massimino. 2010. VisIVO-integrated tools and services for large-scale astrophysical visualization. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 122, 887 (2010), 119.
4. J. Brooke. 2013. SUS: a retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies 8, 2 (2013), 29--40.
5. John Brooke et al. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.
6. G Chiozzi, K Gillies, B Goodrich, S Wampler, J Johnson, K McCann, G Schumacher, and D Silva. 2007. Trends in software for large astronomy projects. In 11th ICALEPCS Int. Conf. on Accelerator & Large Experimental Physics Control Systems, Knoxville. 13--17.
7. Joseph S Dumas and Janice Redish. 1999. A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Intellect Books.
8. G. Fabbiano, D. Calzetti, C. Carilli, G. Djorgovski, P. Eskridge, Z. Ivezic, E. Feigelson, A.; Goodman, B. Madore, S. SEAGER, A. SODERBERG, and T. RECTOR. 2010. Recommendations of the VAO-Science Council. (06/2010 2010), 9 pages. http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2168
9. AsbjøRn Følstad. 2007. Work-domain experts as evaluators: usability inspection of domain-specific work-support systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 22, 3 (2007), 217--245.
10. Richard Gooch. 1996. KARMA: a visualization test-bed. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, G.H. Jacoby and J. Barnes (Eds.). ASP Conf. Series, Vol. 101. Astron. Soc. Pac., 80--82.
11. Alyssa A Goodman. 2012. Principles of high-dimensional data visualization in astronomy. Astronomische Nachrichten 333, 5--6 (2012), 505--514.
12. PJ Hall. 2005. The Square Kilometre Array: An International Engineering Perspective. In The Square Kilometre Array: An Engineering Perspective. Springer, 5--16.
13. A.H. Hassan, C.J. Fluke, and D.G. Barnes. 2011. Interactive visualization of the largest radioastronomy cubes. New Astronomy 16, 2 (2011), 100 -- 109.
14. Amr Hassan and Christopher J Fluke. 2011. Scientific visualization in astronomy: Towards the petascale astronomy era. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 28, 02 (2011), 150--170.
15. Infragisticc. 2016. Indigo Studio. (2016). http://www.infragistics.com/products/indigo-studio [Software].
16. WA Joye and E Mandel. 2003. New features of SAOImage DS9. In Astronomical data analysis software and systems XII (Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series), H. E. Payne, R. I. Jedrzejewski, and R. N. Hook (Eds.), Vol. 295. Astron. Soc. Pac., Astron. Soc. Pac., 489--490.
17. Diane Kelly and Rebecca Sanders. 2008. The challenge of testing scientific software. In Proc. Conf. for the Association for Software Testing (CAST). Toronto, 30--36.
18. Clayton Lewis and John Rieman. 1993. Task-centered user interface design. A practical introduction. Clayton Lewis and John Rieman, Boulder, Colorado.
19. M. List, P. Ebert, and F. Albrecht. 2017. Ten Simple Rules for Developing Usable Software in Computational Biology. PLoS Comput Biol 13, 1 (2017), e1005265.
20. D. R. Luna, D. A. Rizzato Lede, C. M. Otero, M. R. Risk, and F. G. B. de Quiròs. 2017. User-centered design improves the usability of drug-drug interaction alerts: Experimental comparison of interfaces. J. Biomed. Inform. 66 (2017), 204--213.
21. Catriona Macaulay, David Sloan, Xinyi Jiang, Paula Forbes, Scott Loynton, Jason R Swedlow, and Peter Gregor. 2009. Usability and user-centered design in scientific software development. IEEE Software 26, 1 (2009), 96.
22. J.P. McMullin, B. Waters, D. Schiebe, W. Young, and K. Golap. 2007. CASA Architecture and applications. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, R.A. Shaw, F. Hill, and D.J. Bell (Eds.). Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Ser., Vol. 376. Astron. Soc. Pac., Tucson, Arizona, USA, 127.
23. James R Miller and Robin Jeffries. 1992. Interface-usability evaluation: science of trade-offs. Software, IEEE 9, 5 (1992), 97--98.
24. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 152--158.
25. Davide Punzo, JM van der Hulst, JBTM Roerdink, TA Oosterloo, M Ramatsoku, and MAW Verheijen. 2015. The role of 3-D interactive visualization in blind surveys of HI in galaxies. Astronomy and Computing 12 (2015), 86--99.
26. Marc Rettig. 1994. Prototyping for tiny fingers. Commun. ACM 37, 4 (1994), 21--27.
27. Jim Rudd, Ken Stern, and Scott Isensee. 1996. Low vs. High-Fidelity Prototyping Debate. interactions 3, 1 (1996), 76--85.
28. JE Ruiz, JD Santander-Vela, V Espigares, L Verdes-Montenegro, and JM van der Hulst. 2009. GIPSY 3D: Analysis, Visualization and VO Tools for Datacubes. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, Vol. 411. Astron. Soc. Pac., Tucson, Arizona, USA, 406.
29. Judith Segal and Chris Morris. 2008. Developing scientific software. Software, IEEE 25, 4 (2008), 18--20.
30. Ben Shneiderman. 1996. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Visual Languages, 1996. Proceedings., IEEE Symposium on. IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 336--343.
31. J. M. van der Hulst, J. P. Terlouw, K. G. Begeman, W. Zwitser, and P. R. Roelfsema. 1992. The Groningen Image Processing SYstem, GIPSY. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems I, Diana M. Worrall, Chris Biemesderfer, and Jeannette Barnes (Eds.). A.S.P. Conference Series, Vol. 25. Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 131.
32. S. Winter, S. Wagner, and F. Deissenboeck. 2008. A Comprehensive Model of Usability. In Engineering Interactive Systems., J. Gulliksen, M.B. Harning, P. Palanque, G. C. van der Veer G.C., and J. Wesson (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4940. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Physical sciences and engineering

    • Astronomy

• Human-centered computing

  • Interaction design

    • Empirical studies in interaction design