MOBA as a Stage: Explaining Purchase Behavior through different Strategies of Self-Presentation

ABSTRACT

The sale of virtual items has become a major part of revenue for the industry of computer games. Nonetheless, there is a lack of understanding what strategies people utilize within their decision to buy virtual items. Within the Massive Online Battle Arena (MOBA) game genre, virtual items possess no functional value, on the contrary decorative and social motivators can be detected. We apply the theory of self-presentation (SPT) to capture this phenomenon. With the proposal of our study, we aim for a better understanding of preconditions of online self-presentation and the subsequent effects on past purchases. Thus, we propose a research model consisting of personal and social influences explaining different strategies of online self-presentation, which have varied effects on purchases of virtual items.

References

1. Baumeister, R. F., & Hutton, D. G. 1987. Self-presentation theory: Self-construction and audience pleasing. In Theories of group behavior, 71--87. Springer New York.
2. Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. 1999. Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187--206.
3. Canary, D., M. Cody, & Manusov, V. 2003. Interpersonal Communication: A Goals-Based Approach. Bedford/St. Martin's, Boston.
4. Day, D. V., & Schleicher, D. J. (2006). Self-Monitoring at Work: A Motive Based Perspective. Journal of Personality, 74(3), 685--714.
5. Goffman, E. 1978. The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Harmondsworth.
6. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in personality, 37(6), 504--528.
7. Guo, Y., & Barnes, S. 2007. Why people buy virtual items in virtual worlds with real money. ACM Sigmis Database, 38(4), 69--76.
8. Jensen Schau, H., & Gilly, M. C. 2003. We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of consumer research, 30(3), 385--404.
9. Kelman, H. C. 1974. Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification, and internalization. Perspectives on social power, 125171.
10. Kim, H. W., Zheng, J. R., & Gupta, S. 2011. Examining knowledge contribution from the perspective of an online identity in blogging communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1760--1770.
11. Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Kankanhalli, A. 2012. What motivates people to purchase digital items on virtual community websites? The desire for online self-presentation. Information systems research, 23(4), 1232--1245.
12. Kujanpää, T., Manninen, T., & Vallius, L. 2007. What's My Game Character Worth--The Value Components of MMOG Characters. Authors & Digital Games Research Association.
13. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. 2004. Predictors of behavioral loyalty among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Leisure Sciences, 26(1), 99--118.
14. Leary Mark, R. 1996. Self-Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview.
15. Lehdonvirta, V. 2009. Virtual item sales as a revenue model: identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions. Electronic commerce research, 9(1), 97--113.
16. Lennox, R. D., & Wolfe, R. N. 1984. Revision of the self-monitoring scale.
17. Myers, D. G., Abell, J., Kolstad, A., & Sani, F. 2010. Social psychology. London.
18. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. 1992. Consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence and attributional sensitivity. Psychology & Marketing, 9(5), 379--394.
19. Oh, G., & Ryu, T. 2007. Game Design on Itemselling Based Payment Model in Korean Online Games. In DiGRA Conference.
20. Riot Games. 2009. League of Legends. Game [PC]. (27. October 2009). Riot Games, Los Angeles, California, USA. Played June 2017.
21. Schlenker, B. R. 1980. Impression management. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
22. Smith, J. B., & Colgate, M. 2007. Customer value creation: a practical framework. Journal of marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 7--23.
23. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 2004. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.
24. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. 1995) Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144--176.
25. Toups, Z. O., Crenshaw, N. K., Wehbe, R. R., Tondello, G. F., & Nacke, L. E. 2016, October. The Collecting Itself Feels Good: Towards Collection Interfaces for Digital Game Objects. CHI Play (276290).
26. Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11(4), 342--365.
27. Walker, K. 2000. "It's difficult to hide it": The presentation of self on Internet home pages. Qualitative Sociology, 23(1), 99--120.
28. Wohn, D. Y. 2014. Spending real money: purchasing patterns of virtual goods in an online social game. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3359--3368.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Computers in other domains

    • Personal computers and PC applications

      • Computer games

• Human-centered computing

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Multimedia information systems

      • Massively multiplayer online games

• Software and its engineering

  • Software organization and properties

    • Contextual software domains

      • Virtual worlds software

        • Interactive games