skip to main content
10.1145/3131085.3131119acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The role of weak ties in enhancing knowledge work

Published:20 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research paper is to explore the collaboration in knowledge worker's performance from the organizational perspective and decompose most relevant contributing factors. A systematic literature review based on Fink's model [1] was conducted, 22 key journal articles were selected for further analysis. This research sheds light on the use of weak ties in knowledge workers' related tasks, seeking answers towards what context knowledge workers can make use of weak ties in their tasks and for what purposes. A constructive pattern is built to advance some effective measures in knowledge work. Since the focus of the study was on knowledge work-related tasked, there is a possibility that dissimilar evaluations would have arisen if the focus had been on non-knowledge work relevant tasks. This study has gone some way towards enhancing organizations' understanding of the significance of weak ties in knowledge workers' performance. The originality of this paper lies in taking a new look at opportunities of weak ties towards knowledge workers, revisit the significance of weak ties.

References

  1. A. Fink, Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. SAGE, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. S. Granovetter, "The Strength of Weak Ties," Am. J. Sociol., vol. 78, no.6, pp. 1360--1380, May 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Aral, "The Future of Weak Ties," Am. J. Sociol., vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 1931--1939, May 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. Burton, Y. Wu, V. R. Prybutok, and G. Harden, "Differential Effects of the Volume and Diversity of Communication Network Ties on Knowledge Workers' Performance," IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 239--253, Sep. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. T. H. Davenport, "Thinking for A Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers," Harvard Business Press, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. Shimoda, "Talk, trust and information flow: work relationships between Japanese expatriate and host national employees in Indonesia," Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 3853--3871, Nov. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. O. Cimenler, K. A. Reeves, J. Skvoretz, and A. Oztekin, "A causal analytic model to evaluate the impact of researchers' individual innovativeness on their collaborative outputs," J. Model. Manag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 585--611, May 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. O. Godechot, "Getting a Job in Finance. The Strength of Collaboration Ties," Eur. J. Sociol. Arch. Eur. Sociol., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 25--56, Apr. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. T. Hansen, "The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits," Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 82--111, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. E. Kyobe and M. M. Shongwe, "Investigating the extent to which mobile phones reduce Knowledge Transfer barriers in Student Project Teams," SA J. Inf. Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 10 pages, Oct. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Sunley, S. Pinch, and S. Reimer, "Design capital: practice and situated learning in London design agencies," Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 377--392, Jul. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. Z. Levin, J. Walter, and J. K. Murnighan, "Dormant Ties: The Value of Reconnecting," Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1625543, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Ayah, N. Jessani, and E. M. Mafuta, "Institutional capacity for health systems research in East and Central African schools of public health: knowledge translation and effective communication," Health Res. Policy Syst., vol. 12, p. 20, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Dong, M. S. Johar, and R. L. Kumar, "A Benchmarking Model for Management of Knowledge-Intensive Service Delivery Networks," J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 127--160, Dec. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. E. Sosa, "Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks," Organ. Sci., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1--21, Mar. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. K. E. Matthews, A. Crampton, M. Hill, E. D. Johnson, M. D. Sharma, and C. Varsavsky, "Social network perspectives reveal strength of academic developers as weak ties," Int. J. Acad. Dev., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 238--251, Jul. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Zhu and Y. Xia, "Link Prediction in Weighted Networks: A Weighted Mutual Information Model," PLOS ONE, vol. 11, no. 2, p. e0148265, Feb. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Fliaster and J. Spiess, "Knowledge Mobilization Through Social Ties: The Cost-Benefit Analysis," Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1101654, Mar. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. Mu, G. Peng, and E. Love, "Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow," J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 86--100, Jul. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Y. Todo, P. Matous, and H. Inoue, "The strength of long ties and the weakness of strong ties: Knowledge diffusion through supply chain networks," Res. Policy, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1890--1906, Nov. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. L. Sié and A. Yakhlef, "The Passion for Knowledge: implications for its Transfer," Knowl. Process Manag., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 12--20, Jan. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. R. R. Iversen and A. L. Armstrong, "Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans: What Might a Sociological Embeddedness Perspective Offer Disaster Research and Planning?," Anal. Soc. Issues Public Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 183--209, Dec. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. V. Antcliff, R. Saundry, and M. Stuart, "Networks and social capital in the UK television industry: The weakness of weak ties," Hum. Relat., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 371--393, Feb. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. S. L. Jack, "The Role, Use and Activation of Strong and Weak Network Ties: A Qualitative Analysis*," J. Manag. Stud., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1233--1259, Sep. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. C. H. Roch, J. T. Scholz, and K. M. McGraw, "Social Networks and Citizen Response to Legal Change," Am. J. Polit. Sci., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 777--791, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. E. Appelgren, "Data Journalists Using Facebook: A Study of a Resource Group Created by Journalists, for Journalists," Nord. Rev., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1--14, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. T. H.-Y. Chiu and S. Chen, "Propagating online social networks: Via different kinds of weak ties," presented at the Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2013, 2013, pp. 1189--1195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The role of weak ties in enhancing knowledge work

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          AcademicMindtrek '17: Proceedings of the 21st International Academic Mindtrek Conference
          September 2017
          271 pages
          ISBN:9781450354264
          DOI:10.1145/3131085

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 September 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader