skip to main content
research-article

(In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology

Published:05 October 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this article, we present a meta-analysis of research examining visibility of disability. In interrogating the issue of visibility and invisibility in the design of assistive technologies, we open a discussion about how perceptions surrounding disability can be probed through an examination of visibility and how these tensions do, and perhaps should, influence assistive technology design and research.

References

  1. Meryl Alper. 2017. Giving Voice: Mobile Communication, Disability, and Inequality. MIT Press. 17Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Catherine M. Baker, Lauren R. Milne, Ryan Drapeau, Jeffrey Scofield, Cynthia L. Bennett, and Richard E. Ladner. 2016. Tactile graphics with a voice. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 1 (2016), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2854005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alison Benjamin, Jeremy Birnholtz, Ronald Baecker, Diane Gromala, and Andrea Furlan. 2012. Impression management work: How seniors with chronic pain address disruptions in their interactions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 799--808. Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2145324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tom Boellstorff. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K. Cochrane and T. Schiphorst. 2015. Developing design considerations for mobile and wearable technology m-Health applications that can support recovery in mental health disorders. In Proceedings of the 2015 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth’15). 29--36. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2015.259151Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin F. Crabtree and William L. Miller. 1999. Doing Qualitative Research. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Ann Davis. 2005. Invisible disability. Ethics. 116, 1 (2005), 153--213. https://doi.org/10.1086/453151 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jay Timothy Dolmage. 2014. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse University Press. 91Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Felipe, A. Singh, C. Bradley, A. C. Williams, and N. Bianchi-Berthouze. 2015. Roles for personal informatics in chronic pain. In Proceedings of the 2015 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth’15). 161--168. 5 https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2015.259501Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Felipe, A. Singh, C. Bradley, A. C. Williams, and N. Bianchi-Berthouze. 2015. Roles for personal informatics in chronic pain. In Proceedings of the 2015 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth). 161--168. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2015.259501Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Terry Galloway. 2010. Mean Little Deaf Queer: A Memoir. Beacon Press. 169--170Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. A. Gignac, C. Cott, and E. M. Badley. 2000. Adaptation to chronic illness and disability and its relationship to perceptions of independence and dependence. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 55, 6 (2000), 362--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nora Ellen Groce and Irving Kenneth Zola. 1993. Multiculturalism, chronic illness, and disability. Pediatrics 91, 5 (1993), 1048--1055.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Thomas Hahn, Neha Gupta, Charles S. Embry, Patrick Grossmann, Shahrukh Babar, Gregory A. Skibinski, Fusheng Tang, Hidayat Ur Rahman, Richard Segall, Christoph Heim, Raphaela Brunson, Ankush Sharma, Maryam Aslam, Ana Lara-Rodriguez, and Md. Sahidul Islam. 2016. Remote access programs to better integrate individuals with disabilities. 245--250. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982182Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillian Hayes, Gregory Abowd, John Davis, Marion Blount, Maria Ebling, and Elizabeth Mynatt. 2008. Opportunities for pervasive computing in chronic cancer care. Pervasive Computing. 262--279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79576-6_16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillian R. Hayes and Khai N. Truong. 2013. Paratyping: A contextualized method of inquiry for understanding perceptions of mobile and ubiquitous computing technologies. Hum.--Comput. Interact. 28, 3 (2013), 265--286. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2012.697041 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shaun K. Kane, Barbara Linam-Church, Kyle Althoff, and Denise McCall. 2012. What we talk about: Designing a context-aware communication tool for people with aphasia. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 49--56. Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2384926Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Simeon Keates. 2004. Developing BS7000 Part 6 -- guide to managing inclusive design. In User-Centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society. 332--339. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30111-0_29Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Julie A. Kientz, Sebastian Boring, Gregory D. Abowd, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2005. Abaris: Evaluating automated capture applied to structured autism interventions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’05). 323--339. https://doi.org/10.1007/11551201_19Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Catherine Kudlick. 2011. Black bike, white cane: Nonstandard deviations of a special self. Disabil. Stud. Quart. 31, 1 (2011). Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Pape T. Louise-Bender, J. Kim, and B. Weiner. 2002. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors. Disabil. Rehabil. 24, 1--3 (2002), 5--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Haley MacLeod, Kim Oakes, Danika Geisler, Kay Connelly, and Katie Siek. 2015. Rare world: Towards technology for rare diseases. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1145--1154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702494 pg 1147Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Abdullah Al Mahmud and Jean-Bernard Martens. 2015. Iterative design and field trial of an aphasia-friendly email tool. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 7, 4 (2015), 1--36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790305 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Grant David McCracken. 1988. Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities. Indiana University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mary E. McLaughlin, Myrtle P. Bell, and Donna Y. Stringer. 2004. Stigma and acceptance of persons with disabilities: Understudied aspects of workforce diversity. Group Organiz. Manage. 29, 3 (2004), 302--333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103257410Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Robert McRuer. 2006. The Disability Studies Reader (2nd ed.). Queer/Disabled Existence. Routledge, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Robert McRuer. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. NYU Press, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Maia Naftali and Leah Findlater. 2014. Accessibility in context: Understanding the truly mobile experience of smartphone users with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers 8 Accessibility. 209--216. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. David H. Nguyen, Gabriela Marcu, Gillian R. Hayes, Khai N. Truong, James Scott, Marc Langheinrich, and Christof Roduner. 2009. Encountering sensecam: Personal recording technologies in everyday life. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 165--174. Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1620571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Elinor Ochs, Tamar Kremer-Sadlik, Olga Solomon, and Karen Gainer Sirota. 2001. Inclusion as social practice: Views of children with autism. Soc. Dev. 10, 3 (2001), 399--419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00172 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Halley Profita, Reem Albaghli, Leah Findlater, Paul Jaeger, and Shaun K. Kane. 2016. The AT effect: How disability affects the perceived social acceptability of head-mounted display use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4884--4895. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858130Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Halley P. Profita, Abigale Stangl, Laura Matuszewska, Sigrunn Sky, and Shaun K. Kane. 2016. Nothing to hide: Aesthetic customization of hearing aids and cochlear implants in an online community. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’16). 219--227. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982159. pg 226Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kyle Rector, Lauren Milne, Richard E. Ladner, Batya Friedman, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. Exploring the opportunities and challenges with exercise technologies for people who are blind or low-vision. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers 8 Accessibility (ASSETS’15). 203--214. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809846Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kathryn E. Ringland, Christine T. Wolf, LouAnne E. Boyd, Mark S. Baldwin, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2016. Would you be mine: Appropriating minecraft as an assistive technology for youth with autism. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’16). 33--41. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982172Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Kathryn E. Ringland, Christine T. Wolf, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Making “safe”: Community-centered practices in a virtual world dedicated to children with autism. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW’15). 1788--1800. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675216Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Kathryn E. Ringland, Christine T. Wolf, Heather Faucett, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2016. “Will I always be not social?”: Re-Conceptualizing sociality in the context of a minecraft community for autism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1256--1269. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858038Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. André Rodrigues, Kyle Montague, Hugo Nicolau, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2015. Getting smartphones to talkback: Understanding the smartphone adoption process of blind users. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers 8 Accessibility. 23--32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809842Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ellen Samuels. 2014. Fantasies of Identification: Disability, Gender, Race. NYU Press. 137Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Janki Shankar, Lili Liu, David Nicholas, Sharon Warren, Daniel Lai, Shawn Tan, Rosslynn Zulla, Jennifer Couture, and Alexandra Sears. 2014. Employers’ perspectives on hiring and accommodating workers with mental illness. SAGE Open 4, 3 (2014), 2158244014547880. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014547880Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: Assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). 705--714. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979044Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Self-conscious or self-confident? a diary study conceptualizing the social accessibility of assistive technology. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 2 (2016), 1--31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2827857. 6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Tobin Siebers. 2008. Disability Theory. University of Michigan Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Sharon Dale Stone. 2005. Reactions to invisible disability: The experiences of young women survivors of hemorrhagic stroke. Disabil. Rehabil. 27, 6 (2005), 293--304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400008990 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Sarit Felicia Anais Szpiro, Shafeka Hashash, Yuhang Zhao, and Shiri Azenkot. 2016. How people with low vision access computing devices: Understanding challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 171--180. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Sarit Szpiro, Yuhang Zhao, and Shiri Azenkot. 2016. Finding a store, searching for a product: A study of daily challenges of low vision people. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’16). 61--72. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Enrico Tanuwidjaja, Derek Huynh, Kirsten Koa, Calvin Nguyen, Churen Shao, Patrick Torbett, Colleen Emmenegger, and Nadir Weibel. 2014. Chroma: A wearable augmented-reality solution for color blindness. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 799--810. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632091Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Rosemarie Garland Thomson. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. Columbia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Tammy Toscos, Kay Connelly, and Yvonne Rogers. 2013. Designing for positive health affect: Decoupling negative emotion and health monitoring technologies. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 153--160. Retrieved April 1, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2534537Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Anne Werner and Kirsti Malterud. 2003. It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: Encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Soc. Sci. Med. 57, 8 (2003), 1409--1419. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Kristin Williams, Karyn Moffatt, Jonggi Hong, Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah, and Leah Findlater. 2016. The cost of turning heads: A comparison of a head-worn display to a smartphone for supporting persons with aphasia in conversation. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 111--120. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982165Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Hanlu Ye, Meethu Malu, Uran Oh, and Leah Findlater. 2014. Current and future mobile and wearable device use by people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3123--3132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557085Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Annuska Zolyomi and Marc Schmalz. 2017. Mining for social skills: Minecraft in home and therapy for neurodiverse youth. In International 50th Hawaii Conference on System Sciences. DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2017.411 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Hong Zou and Jutta Treviranus. 2015. Chartmaster: A tool for interacting with stock market charts using a screen reader. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers 8 Accessibility. 107--116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809862Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. NAIPC.org About Us. Retrieved March 31, 2017 from http://naipc.org/About-Us.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Autcraft.com. 2017. The first minecraft server for children with autism and their familiesRetrieved March 31, 2017 from http://www.autcraft.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. (In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
      ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 10, Issue 4
      October 2017
      129 pages
      ISSN:1936-7228
      EISSN:1936-7236
      DOI:10.1145/3131767
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 October 2017
      • Accepted: 1 August 2017
      • Revised: 1 June 2017
      • Received: 1 April 2017
      Published in taccess Volume 10, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader