skip to main content
10.1145/3132446.3134894acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design of a Compact ROV for River Exploration

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Remotely operated underwater vehicles (ROVs) are being extensively used in marine industry for exploration, pollution control, and military applications. With time ROVs have become smaller, less expensive, reliable and practical for small scale use. This paper presents the design of a compact low-cost ROV for river exploration with a modular structure. The ROV is neutrally buoyant which increases its efficiency. The ROV uses three thrusters for its movement inside water and has 3 degrees of freedom (DOF). A detailed 3D model is developed using SOLIDWORKS and stress analysis has been carried out to ensure it will not fail under hydrodynamic pressure. Hydrodynamic characteristics are studied using ANSYS FLUENT, which helps in determining the maximum thrust required for the vehicle propulsion and the maximum achievable velocity. The prototype is manufactured with glass fiber composite and fitted with different electronics components, sensors, and battery. The field test of the ROV is carried out in a controlled underwater environment.

References

  1. Nakajoh, H. et al. 2016. Development of 7000m work class ROV "KAIKO Mk-IV." OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey (Sep. 2016), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nornes, S.M. et al. 2016. Automatic relative motion control and photogrammetry mapping on steep underwater walls using ROV. OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey (Sep. 2016), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nowald, N. et al. 2016. MARUM-Squid - a powerful, yet compact 2000 m ROV system designed for marine research operations from smaller vessels. OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey (Sep. 2016), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Padial, J. et al. 2014. Correlation of imaging sonar acoustic shadows and bathymetry for ROV terrain-relative localization. OCEANS 2014 - TAIPEI (Apr. 2014), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Reisenbichler, K.R. et al. 2016. Automating MBARI's midwater time-series video surveys: the transition from ROV to AUV. OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey (Sep. 2016), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. T200 Thruster with BlueESC - Blue Robotics: https://www.bluerobotics.com/store/thrusters/t200-thruster-blueesc/. Accessed: 2017-02-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design of a Compact ROV for River Exploration

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AIR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Conference on Advances in Robotics
        June 2017
        325 pages
        ISBN:9781450352949
        DOI:10.1145/3132446

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 June 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader