skip to main content
10.1145/3136755.3136781acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Head-mounted displays as opera glasses: using mixed-reality to deliver an egalitarian user experience during live events

Published:03 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the use of head-mounted displays (HMDs) as a way to deliver a front row experience to any audience member during a live event. To do so, it presents a two-part user study that compares participants reported sense of presence across three experimental conditions: front row, back row, and back row with HMD (displaying 360° video captured live from the front row). Data was collected using the Temple Presence Inventory (TPI), which measures presence across eight factors. The reported sense of presence in the HMD condition was significantly higher in five of these measures, including spatial presence, social presence, passive social presence, active social presence, and social richness. We argue that the non-significant differences found in the other three factors – engagement, social realism, and perceptual realism – are artefacts of participants’ personal taste for the song being performed, or the effects of using a mixed-reality approach. Finally, the paper describes a basic system for low-latency, 360° video live streaming using off-the-shelf, affordable equipment and software.

References

  1. Mark Billinghurst, Ivan Poupyrev, Hirokazu Kato, and Richard May. 2000. Mixing realities in Shared Space: an augmented reality interface for collaborative computing. In 2000 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME2000. Proceedings. Latest Advances in the Fast Changing World of Multimedia (Cat. No.00TH8532), 1641–1644 vol.3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Matthew Botvinick and Jonathan Cohen. 1998. Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 6669: 756–756.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lauren deLisa Coleman. How The VR Concert Industry Is Boldly Jockeying For A Slice Of A Projected $660M Pie. Forbes. Retrieved August 13, 2017 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurencoleman/2017/02/23/how-the-vr-concertindustry-is-boldly-jockeying-for-a-slice-of-a-projected-660m-pie/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Michael Dowdy. 2007. Live Hip Hop, Collective Agency, and “Acting in Concert.” Popular Music and Society 30, 1: 75–91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. H. Henrik Ehrsson. 2007. The Experimental Induction of Out-of-Body Experiences. Science 317, 5841: 1048–1048.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wijnand A IJsselsteijn, Yvonne A. W de Kort, and Antal Haans. 2006. Is This My Hand I See Before Me? The Rubber Hand Illusion in Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15, 4: 455–464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Konstantina Kilteni, Jean-Marie Normand, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, and Mel Slater. 2012. Extending Body Space in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Very Long Arm Illusion. PLOS ONE 7, 7: e40867.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jane Lessiter, Jonathan Freeman, Edmund Keogh, and Jules Davidoff. 2001. A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10, 3: 282–297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Matthew Lombard, Theresa B. Ditton, and Lisa Weinstein. 2009. Measuring Presence: The Temple Presence Inventory. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence, 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays (Special Issue on Networked Reality). IEICE transactions on information and systems 77, 12: 1321–1329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. North by Northwestern. 2014. Turn it Off: Cell Phones and Concert Culture. Huffington Post. Retrieved August 13, 2017 from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/north-by-northwestern/turn-it-off-cellphones-a_b_5432289.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Francesco Pavani and Massimiliano Zampini. 2007. The Role of Hand Size in the Fake-Hand Illusion Paradigm. Perception 36, 10: 1547–1554.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Rodrigo M. A. Silva, Bruno Feijó, Pablo B. Gomes, Thiago Frensh, and Daniel Monteiro. 2016. Real Time 360° Video Stitching and Streaming. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Posters (SIGGRAPH ’16), 70:1–70:2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Adalberto L. Simeone, Eduardo Velloso, and Hans Gellersen. 2015. Substitutional Reality: Using the Physical Environment to Design Virtual Reality Experiences. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15), 3307–3316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Filip Škola and Fotis Liarokapis. 2016. Examining the effect of body ownership in immersive virtual and augmented reality environments. The Visual Comp. 32, 6–8: 761–770. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ina Wagner, Wolfgang Broll, Giulio Jacucci, Kari Kuutii, Rod McCall, Ann Morrison, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Jean-Jacques Terrin. 2009. On the Role of Presence in Mixed Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 18, 4: 249–276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. NVIDIA VRWorks TM. NVIDIA Developer. Retrieved May 21, 2017 from https://developer.nvidia.com/vrworksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Max_Worldmaking_Package: A package for Max/MSP/Jitter to support computational worldmaking. Computational Worldmaking Lab. Retrieved May 15, 2017 from https://github.com/worldmaking/Max_Worldmaking_PackageGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Theatregoers. London Opera Glass Company. Retrieved May 20, 2017 from zhttp://operaglasses.co.uk/theatregoers/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Virtual Reality Studio Session. Retrieved May 20, 2017 from https://www.edef.co.uk/event/154/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cycling ’74. Retrieved May 15, 2017 from https://cycling74.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. RICOH Live Streaming Driver (THETA UVC Blender) with Equirectangular Output. Retrieved August 13, 2017 from http://theta360.guide/communitydocument/uvc-theta.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Danny Mooney Music - Home. Retrieved August 13, 2017 from https://www.facebook.com/DannyMooneyMusic/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Murray Lunam Drums - Home. Retrieved August 13, 2017 from https://www.facebook.com/MurrayLunamDrums/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Head-mounted displays as opera glasses: using mixed-reality to deliver an egalitarian user experience during live events

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICMI '17: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
        November 2017
        676 pages
        ISBN:9781450355438
        DOI:10.1145/3136755

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        ICMI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate65of149submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader