skip to main content
10.1145/3139131.3139143acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Information recall in a virtual reality disability simulation

Published:08 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of the sense of presence on one aspect of learning, information recall, in an immersive virtual reality (VR) disability simulation. Previous research has shown that the use of VR technology in education may facilitate improved learning outcomes, however, it is still an active research topic as the learning outcomes can vary widely. We hypothesized that a higher level of immersion and involvement in a VR disability simulation that leads to a high sense of presence will help the user improve information recall. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted a between subjects experiment in which participants were presented information about multiple sclerosis in different immersive conditions and afterwards they attempted to recall the information. We also looked into whether there is any adverse effect of cybersickness on the information recall task in our disability simulation. The results from our study suggest that participants who were in immersive conditions were able to recall the information more effectively than the participants who experienced a non-immersive condition.

References

  1. EJ Arthur, PA Hancock, and ST Chrysler. 1997. The perception of spatial layout in real and virtual worlds. Ergonomics 40, 1 (1997), 69--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jeremy N Bailenson, Nick Yee, Jim Blascovich, Andrew C Beall, Nicole Lundblad, and Michael Jin. 2008. The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: Digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 17, 1 (2008), 102--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Barbara M Brooks. 1999. The specificity of memory enhancement during interaction with a virtual environment. Memory 7, 1 (1999), 65--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chiu-Hsiang Chou. 1998. The effectiveness of using multimedia computer simulations coupled with social constructivist pedagogy in a college introductory physics classroom. Columbia University Teachers College.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tanvir Irfan Chowdhury, Raphael Costa, and John Quarles. 2017a. Information Recall in a Mobile VR Disability Simulation. 9th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games) (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tanvir Irfan Chowdhury, Raphael Costa, and John Quarles. 2017b. Information recall in VR disability simulation. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2017 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 219--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Barney Dalgarno and Mark JW Lee. 2010. What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology 41, 1 (2010), 10--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. C DEDE and MC LOFTIN SALZMAN. 2001. Virtual realities for learning complex and abstract scientific concepts. 1995. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashley Flower, Matthew K Burns, and Nicole A Bottsford-Miller. 2007. Meta-analysis of disability simulation research. Remedial and Special Education 28, 2 (2007), 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sally French. 1992. Simulation exercises in disability awareness training: A critique. Disability, Handicap & Society 7, 3 (1992), 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Richard D Hartwell. 2001. Understanding Disabilities. Educational Leadership 58, 7 (2001), 72--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hannes Kaufmann, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Michael Wagner. 2000. Construct3D: a virtual reality application for mathematics and geometry education. Education and information technologies 5, 4 (2000), 263--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Robert S Kennedy, Norman E Lane, Kevin S Berbaum, and Michael G Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The international journal of aviation psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Joseph J LaViola Jr. 2000. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 32, 1 (2000), 47--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Katerina Mania and Alan Chalmers. 2001. The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments: A reality centered approach. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4, 2 (2001), 247--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Katerina Mania, Andrew Robinson, and Karen R Brandt. 2005. The effect of memory schemas on object recognition in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14, 5 (2005), 606--615. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tassos A Mikropoulos and Antonis Natsis. 2011. Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999--2009). Computers & Education 56, 3 (2011), 769--780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Roxana Moreno and Richard E Mayer. 2002. Learning science in virtual reality multi-media environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of educational psychology 94, 3 (2002), 598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. MSQ 2017. Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (MSQ). (2017). Retrieved September 22, 2017 from https://goo.gl/L7oJ5tGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. OD 2017. Oxford Dictionary. (2017). Retrieved September 22, 2017 from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Veronica S Pantelidis. 2010. Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education 2, 1--2 (2010), 59--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Susan Persky, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Cade McCall, Christina Lachance, Andrew C Beall, and Jim Blascovich. 2009. Presence relates to distinct outcomes in two virtual environments employing different learning modalities. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12, 3 (2009), 263--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sandra Dutra Piovesan, Liliana Maria Passerino, and Adriana Soares Pereira. 2012. Virtual Reality as a Tool in the Education. International Association for Development of the Information Society (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jayne Pivik, Joan McComas, Ian MaCfarlane, and Marc Laflamme. 2002. Using virtual reality to teach disability awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research 26, 2 (2002), 203--218. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. JIRI POLCAR and PETR HOREJSI. 2013. Knowledge Acquisition And Cyber Sickness: A Comparison Of VR Devices In Virtual Tours. Science (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Joseph Psotka. 2013. Educational Games and Virtual Reality as Disruptive Technologies. Educational Technology & Society 16, 2 (2013), 69--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Eric D Ragan, Ajith Sowndararajan, Regis Kopper, and Doug A Bowman. 2010. The effects of higher levels of immersion on procedure memorization performance and implications for educational virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19, 6 (2010), 527--543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ladette Randolph, Janet Murray, and Richard Lanham. 1998. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Michael L Rothschild. 1984. Perspectives on involvement: current problems and future directions. NA-Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11 (1984).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Maria Roussos, Andrew Johnson, Thomas Moher, Jason Leigh, Christina Vasilakis, and Craig Barnes. 1999. Learning and building together in an immersive virtual world. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8, 3 (1999), 247--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Maria Roussou, Martin Oliver, and Mel Slater. 2006. The virtual playground: an educational virtual reality environment for evaluating interactivity and conceptual learning. Virtual reality 10, 3--4 (2006), 227--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Richard M Satava and Shaun B Jones. 1997. Virtual environments for medical training and education. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 2 (1997), 139--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Roger Schank and Henrietta Saunders. 2001. Virtual learning: A revolutionary approach to building a highly skilled workforce. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sarah Sharples, Sue Cobb, Amanda Moody, and John R Wilson. 2008. Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays 29, 2 (2008), 58--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Ajith Sowndararajan, Rongrong Wang, and Doug A Bowman. 2008. Quantifying the benefits of immersion for procedural training. In Proceedings of the 2008 workshop on Immersive projection technologies/Emerging display technologiges. ACM, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Kay M Stanney, Kelly S Hale, Isabelina Nahmens, and Robert S Kennedy. 2003. What to expect from immersive virtual environment exposure: Influences of gender, body mass index, and past experience. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45, 3 (2003), 504--520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Sharon Stansfield, Daniel Shawver, Annette Sobel, Monica Prasad, and Lydia Tapia. 2000. Design and implementation of a virtual reality system and its application to training medical first responders. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9, 6 (2000), 524--556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jonathan Stevens and Peter Kincaid. 2014. Measuring Visual Displays' Effect on Novice Performance in Door Gunnery. Technical Report. DTIC Document.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Jari Takatalo, Takashi Kawai, Jyrki Kaistinen, Göte Nyman, and Jukka Häkkinen. 2011. User experience in 3D stereoscopic games. Media Psychology 14, 4 (2011), 387--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. William Winn. 1993. A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality. Technical Publication R-93--9, Human Interface Technology Laboratory of the Washington Technology Center, Seattle: University of Washington (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Bob G Witmer and Michael J Singer. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments 7, 3 (1998), 225--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Zacharias C Zacharia. 2003. Using interactive simulations to enhance students âĂŹ explanations regarding physical phenomena. Computer based learning (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Information recall in a virtual reality disability simulation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          VRST '17: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
          November 2017
          437 pages
          ISBN:9781450355483
          DOI:10.1145/3139131

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 November 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate66of254submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          VRST '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader