skip to main content
10.1145/3139131.3139163acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Immersive environment for distributed creative collaboration

Published:08 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

While videoconferencing has been available for years, tools for distributed creative collaboration such as brainstorming have not yet reached professional use. Unlike regular conferencing, brainstorming relies on information exchange across multiple channels in shared task and communication spaces. If a participant joins a facilitated brainstorming session remotely through his/her mobile device, perceiving these spaces is challenging. By proposing an immersive environment for the remote participant, this tech note addresses how to provide him/her a stronger engagement. Offered as a client application for the remote participant's tablet device, it enables him/her to see all channels and select which one to interact with. Our proof-of-concept client allows us to examine how this immersive environment for distributed creative collaboration can provide the remote participant with an increased engagement.

References

  1. Sara A.. Bly and Scott L. Minneman. 1990. Commune: A Shared Drawing Surface. In COCS '90 Proceedings of the ACM SIGOIS and IEEE CS TCOA conference on Office information systems. ACM, New York, USA, 184--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hiroshi A.. Ishii and Minoru Kobayashi. 1992. Clearboard: A Seamless Medium for Shared Drawing and Conversation with Eye Contact. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, USA, 525--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. David Kirk, Tom Rodden, and Danea Stanton Fraser. 2007. Turn it This Way: Grounding Collaborative Action with Remote Gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, USA, 1039--1048. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. David Kirk and Danea Stanton Fraser. 2006. Comparing Remote Gesture Technologies for Supporting Collaborative Physical Task. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, USA, 1191--1200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Myron K. Krueger. 1983. Artificial Reality 2 (2nd. ed.). Wiley, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Andreas Kunz, Ali Alavi, and Philipp Sinn. 2014. Integrating Pointing Gesture Detection for Enhancing Brainstorming Meeting Using Kinect and Pixelsense. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology. CIRP, Paris, France, 205--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Andreas Kunz, Thomas Nescher, and Martin Kchler. 2010. CollaBoard: A Novel Interactive Whiteboard for Remote Collaboration with People on Content. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Cyberworlds. IEEE, New York, USA, 430--437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Thomas Nescher and Andreas Kunz. 2011. An Interactive Whiteboard for Immersive Telecollaboration. International Journal of Computer Graphics 27, 4 (2011), 311--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Michinov Nicolas. 2012. Is Electronic Brainstorming or Brainwriting the Best Way to Improve Creative Performance in Groups? An Overlooked Comparison of Two Idea Generation Techniques. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42, S1 (2012), E222--E243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Polycom. 2017. RealPresence Centro. (May 2017). Retrieved June 26, 2017 from http://www.polycom.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jun'ichiro Seyama and Ruth S. Nagayama. 2007. The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16, 4 (2007), 337--351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. David. Stotts, Jason Smith, and Dennis Jen. 2003. Clearboard: A Seamless Medium for Shared Drawing and Conversation with Eye Contact. In Proceedings of UIST 2003. ACM, New York, USA, 57--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Anthony Tang, Carman Neustaedter, and Saul Greenberg. 2004. VideoArms: Supporting Remote Embodiment in Groupware. In Video Proceedings CSCW 2004. ACM, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Anthony Tang, Carman Neustaedter, and Saul Greenberg. 2006. VideoArms: Embodiments for Mixed Presence Groupware. In Proceedings of HCI 2006. ACM, New York, USA, 85--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. John C. Tang and Scott L. Minneman. 1991a. VideoDraw: A Video Interface for Collaborative Drawing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, USA, 313--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. John C. Tang and Scott L. Minneman. 1991b. VideoWhiteboard: Video Shadows to Support Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, USA, 315--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pierre Wellner. 1993. Interacting with Paper on the Digital Desk. Commun. ACM 36, 7 (1993), 87--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pierre Wellner and Stephen Freeman. 1993. The Double Digital Desk: Shared Editing of Paper Documents. XEROX Euro PARC Technical Report EPC-93-108 (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Immersive environment for distributed creative collaboration

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          VRST '17: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
          November 2017
          437 pages
          ISBN:9781450355483
          DOI:10.1145/3139131

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 November 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate66of254submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          VRST '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader