skip to main content
10.1145/3139958.3140053acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Traffic Prediction Based Power Saving in Cellular Networks: A Machine Learning Method

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In smart cities, green cellular networks play a crucial role to support wireless access for numerous devices anywhere and anytime with efficiency and sustainability. Because base stations (BSes) consume more than 70% of overall cellular network infrastructure energy, saving the power consumption of BSes is the key task to build a green cellular network. Except for low power design of the BS hardware and software, the traffic-driven BS sleeping operation is an economical way to improve existing cellular networks, which can reduce the BS power consumption at low traffic load. However, prior BS sleeping strategies establish on the static temporal characteristics of traffic load, which ignore the fact that network traffic is influenced by many factors such as time, human mobility, holiday, weather, etc. Hence, prior traffic estimation is coarse, and the BS sleeping strategies cannot apply to the changing network traffic. In this paper, we exploit a machine learning method to estimate the BS traffic and propose a BS sleeping strategy based on predicted traffic for power saving in the cellular network. We analyze network traffic in multi-views: temporal influence, spatial influence, and event influence. Then, we propose a multi-view ensemble learning model to predict network traffic load, which learns the traffic in multi-views and combine the results with ensemble. Furthermore, we formulate a BS sleeping strategy based on the predicted traffic load. Finally, we evaluate our traffic prediction algorithm on real cellular network data. The evaluation shows that our traffic prediction algorithm improves about 40% than state-of-the-art machine learning methods. Also, we evaluate the proposed BS sleeping strategy, which yields about 10% more energy savings and less device damage than the competitors in the simulated environment.

References

  1. Oliver Arnold, Fred Richter, Gerhard Fettweis, and Oliver Blume. 2010. Power consumption modeling of different base station types in heterogeneous cellular networks. In Future Network and Mobile Summit, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Imran Ashraf, Federico Boccardi, and Lester Ho. 2011. Sleep mode techniques for small cell deployments. IEEE Communications Magazine (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Leo Breiman, Jerome Friedman, Charles J Stone, and Richard A Olshen. 1984. Classification and regression trees. CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Peter J Brockwell and Richard A Davis. 2016. Introduction to time series and forecasting. springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bin Cao, Jing Fan, Mingxuan Yuan, and Yanhua Li. 2016. Toward accurate energy-efficient cellular network: switching off excessive carriers based on traffic profiling. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shuguang Cui, Andrea J Goldsmith, and Ahmad Bahai. 2004. Energy-efficiency of MIMO and cooperative MIMO techniques in sensor networks. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Aleksandar Damnjanovic, Juan Montojo, Yongbin Wei, Tingfang Ji, Tao Luo, Madhavan Vajapeyam, Taesang Yoo, Osok Song, and Durga Malladi. 2011. A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks. IEEE Wireless Communications (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Weiwei Duan and Yao-Yi Chiang. 2016. Building knowledge graph from public data for predictive analysis: a case study on predicting technology future in space and time. In SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Analytics for Big Geospatial Data. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gerhard Fettweis and Ernesto Zimmermann. 2008. ICT energy consumption-trends and challenges. In Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on wireless personal multimedia communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fabien Girardin, Andrea Vaccari, Alexandre Gerber, Assaf Biderman, and Carlo Ratti. 2009. Towards estimating the presence of visitors from the aggregate mobile phone network activity they generate. In Intl. Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Congzheng Han, Tim Harrold, Simon Armour, Ioannis Krikidis, Stefan Videv, Peter M Grant, Harald Haas, John S Thompson, Ivan Ku, Cheng-Xiang Wang, and others. 2011. Green radio: radio techniques to enable energy-efficient wireless networks. IEEE communications magazine (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Minh X Hoang, Yu Zheng, and Ambuj K Singh. 2016. FCCF: forecasting citywide crowd flows based on big data. In SIGSPATIAL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nahina Islam, Sithamparanathan Kandeepan, and James Scott. 2015. Energy efficiency of cellular base stations with ternary-state transceivers. In ICSPCS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jinseong Jeong, Donald F Kimball, Myoungbo Kwak, Paul Draxler, Chin Hsia, Craig Steinbeiser, Thomas Landon, Oleh Krutko, Lawrence E Larson, and Peter M Asbeck. 2009. High-efficiency WCDMA envelope tracking base-station amplifier implemented with GaAs HVHBTs. IEEE journal of solid-state circuits (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ram Keralapura, Antonio Nucci, Zhi-Li Zhang, and Lixin Gao. 2010. Profiling users in a 3g network using hourglass co-clustering. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Chang Li, Jun Zhang, and Khaled Ben Letaief. 2013. Energy efficiency analysis of small cell networks. In ICC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ming Li, Pan Li, Xiaoxia Huang, Yuguang Fang, and Savo Glisic. 2015. Energy consumption optimization for multihop cognitive cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rongpeng Li, Zhifeng Zhao, Xianfu Chen, Jacques Palicot, and Honggang Zhang. 2014. TACT: A transfer actor-critic learning framework for energy saving in cellular radio access networks. IEEE transactions on wireless communications (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rongpeng Li, Zhifeng Zhao, Xuan Zhou, and Honggang Zhang. 2014. Energy savings scheme in radio access networks via compressive sensing-based traffic load prediction. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yexin Li, Yu Zheng, Huichu Zhang, and Lei Chen. 2015. Traffic prediction in a bike-sharing system. In SIGSPATIAL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Andy Liaw and Matthew Wiener. 2002. Classification and regression by random-Forest. R news 2, 3 (2002), 18--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Christopher D Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, Hinrich Schütze, and others. 2008. Introduction to information retrieval. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Marco Ajmone Marsan, Luca Chiaraviglio, Delia Ciullo, and Michela Meo. 2013. On the efectiveness of single and multiple base station sleep modes in cellular networks. Computer Networks (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In NIPS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Diala Naboulsi, Marco Fiore, Stephane Ribot, and Razvan Stanica. 2016. Large-scale mobile traffic analysis: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Diala Naboulsi, Razvan Stanica, and Marco Fiore. 2014. Classifying call profiles in large-scale mobile traffic datasets. In INFOCOM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Eduardo Mucelli Rezende Oliveira, Aline Carneiro Viana, Kolar Purushothama Naveen, and Carlos Sarraute. 2015. Measurement-driven mobile data traffic modeling in a large metropolitan area. In PerCom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Utpal Paul, Anand Prabhu Subramanian, Milind Madhav Buddhikot, and Samir R Das. 2011. Understanding traffic dynamics in cellular data networks. In INFOCOM, 2011 Proceedings IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Chunyi Peng, Suk-Bok Lee, Songwu Lu, Haiyun Luo, and Hewu Li. 2011. Traffic-driven power saving in operational 3G cellular networks. In Proceedings of the 17th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Louai Saker, Salah-Eddine Elayoubi, Richard Combes, and Tijani Chahed. 2012. Optimal control of wake up mechanisms of femtocells in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohammad Salahuddin, Khorshed Alam, and Ilhan Ozturk. 2016. The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. M Zubair Shafiq, Lusheng Ji, Alex X Liu, and Jia Wang. 2011. Characterizing and modeling internet traffic dynamics of cellular devices. In SIGMETRICS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ward Van Heddeghem, Sofie Lambert, Bart Lannoo, Didier Colle, Mario Pickavet, and Piet Demeester. 2014. Trends in worldwide ICT electricity consumption from 2007 to 2012. Computer Communications (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Guoxiang Wang, Caili Guo, Shengsen Wang, and Chunyan Feng. 2013. A traffic prediction based sleeping mechanism with low complexity in femtocell networks. In ICC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yi Wang, Michalis Faloutsos, and Hui Zang. 2013. On the usage patterns of multi-modal communication: Countries and evolution. In Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2013 IEEE Conference on.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Carey Williamson, Emir Halepovic, Hongxia Sun, and Yujing Wu. 2005. Characterization of CDMA2000 cellular data network traffic. In Local Computer Networks, 2005. 30th Anniversary. The IEEE Conference on. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Fei Wu, Hongjian Wang, and Zhenhui Li. 2016. Interpreting traffic dynamics using ubiquitous urban data. In SIGSPATIAL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jingjin Wu, Yujing Zhang, Moshe Zukerman, and Edward Kai-Ning Yung. 2015. Energy-efficient base-stations sleep-mode techniques in green cellular networks: A survey. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu Ximei. 2016. http://www.escn.com.cn/news/show-334775.html. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Cong Xiong, Geoffrey Ye Li, Shunqing Zhang, Yan Chen, and Shugong Xu. 2012. Energy-efficient resource allocation in OFDMA networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zheng Yang, Jonathan Roth, and Rishee K Jain. 2016. Data-driven benchmarking of building energy performance at the city scale. In SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Smart Cities and Urban Analytics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Xiuwen Yi, Yu Zheng, Junbo Zhang, and Tianrui Li. 2016. ST-MVL: Filling Missing Values in Geo-Sensory Time Series Data. In IJCAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ming Zeng, Tong Yu, Xiao Wang, Vincent Su, Le T Nguyen, and Ole J Mengshoel. 2016. Improving Demand Prediction in Bike Sharing System by Learning Global Features. Machine Learning for Large Scale Transportation Systems (LSTS)@ KDD-16 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Ying Zhang and Ake Årvidsson. 2012. Understanding the characteristics of cellular data traffic. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Shenglin Zhao, Irwin King, Michael R Lyu, Jia Zeng, and Mingxuan Yuan. 2017. Mining Business Opportunities from Location-based Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 1037--1040. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Traffic Prediction Based Power Saving in Cellular Networks: A Machine Learning Method

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGSPATIAL '17: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
            November 2017
            677 pages
            ISBN:9781450354905
            DOI:10.1145/3139958

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 November 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGSPATIAL '17 Paper Acceptance Rate39of193submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader