skip to main content
10.1145/3147704.3147707acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroplopConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Management Stance Patterns

Published:12 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Situations repeat in every organisation. While some of them may constitute a reassuring structure, others may constitute an irritating obstacle in daily routine. Repeating situations may emerge quickly or slowly, they may be stable over time or volatile, and they may have minor or major consequences within an organisation. Either way, they are likely to affect each and every person within an organisation in one way or another. This raises the question if, in turn, one may influence repeating situations by adequate means. In this work, we try to provide such means and propose three management stances that constitute an approach to address repeating situations. We provide examples of use and mention their limits before codifying them into a pattern format as it is used within the pattern community.

References

  1. Brougham, G. 2015. The Cynefin Mini-Book: An Introduction to Complexity and the Cynefin Framework. lulu.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Derby, E. and Larsen, D. 2006. Agile Retrospectives: Making Good Team Great. O'Reilly UK Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Eoyang, G. H. and Holladay, R. J. 2013. Adaptive Action: Leveraging Uncertainty in Your Organization. Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Grosz, S. 2013. The Examined Life: How We Lose and Find Ourselves. Chatto & Windus.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kurtz, C. F. and Snowden, D. J. 2003. The New Dynamics of Strategy: Sense-Making in a Complex and Complicated World. IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 42, No. 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Patterson, K. and Grenny, J. and Maxfield, D. and McMillan, R. and Switzler, A. 2013. Crucial Accountability: Tools for Resolving Violated Expectations, Broken Commitments, and Bad Behavior. McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rock, D. 2008. SCARF: A Brain-Based Model for Collaborating with and Influencing Others. NeuroLeadership Journal, Vol. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rosenberg, M. B. 2009. Gewaltfreie Kommunikation: Eine Sprache des Lebens. Junfermann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Schein, E. H. 2013. Humbly Inquiry: The Gentle Art of Asking Instead of Telling. Berrett-Koehler.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Senge, P. M. 2011. Die fünfte Disziplin: Kunst und Praxis der lernenden Organisation. Schäffer-Poeschel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wellhausen, T. and Fiesser, A. 2011. How to write a pattern? A rough guide for first-time pattern authors. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Article 5, 9 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Wilkinson, D. J. 2006. The Ambiguity Advantage: What Great Leaders Are Great At. Palgrave Macmillian.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Management Stance Patterns

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          EuroPLoP '17: Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs
          July 2017
          566 pages
          ISBN:9781450348485
          DOI:10.1145/3147704

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 July 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          EuroPLoP '17 Paper Acceptance Rate34of53submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate216of354submissions,61%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader