ABSTRACT
This study examined the effect of touching a warm or cold surface while interacting with a chatbot to see if temperature contributes to feelings of closeness with the artificial conversational agent. Our two-group experiment (N= 44) found no differences between hot and cold conditions in people's liking of the chatbot, but found a main effect of existing favorable attitudes toward chatbots.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
The files that are included contain the poster research board and this readme.txt. The poster is in a pdf format and contains a summarized version of the abstract. Any PDF viewing software can be used to open the files. The poster has a diagram of how the experiment was set up. A bar chart of the mean and standard deviation of temperature is under the results section.
- Martin Cooney, Shuichi Nishio, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2014. Affectionate Interaction with a Small Humanoid Robot Capable of Recognizing Social Touch Behavior. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 4, 4: 1--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stefania Druga, Randi Williams, Cynthia Breazeal, and Mitchel Resnick. 2017. "Hey Google is it OK if I eat you?" Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC '17: 595--600. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gijs Huisman, Merijn Bruijnes, Jan Kolkmeier, Merel Jung, Aduén Darriba Frederiks, and Yves Rybarczyk. 2013. Touching Virtual Agents: Embodiment and Mind. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology AICT-425: 114--138.Google Scholar
- Yoona Kang, Lawrence E. Williams, Margaret S. Clark, Jeremy R. Gray, and John A. Bargh. 2011. Physical temperature effects on trust behavior: The role of insula. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.Google Scholar
- Lue Lin, Luis Fernando D'Haro, and Rafael Banchs. 2016. A Web-based Platform for Collection of Human-Chatbot Interactions. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction - HAI '16: 363--366. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hideyuki Nakanishi, Kazuaki Tanaka, Yuya Wada. 2014. Remote handshaking. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, ACM Press, 2143--2152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Junya Nakanishi, Kaiko Kuwamura, Takashi Minato, Shuichi Nishio, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2013. Evoking affection for a communication partner by a robotic communication medium. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (iHAI 2013) 34, 2: 2326.Google Scholar
- Jiaqi Nie, Michelle Park, Angie Lorena Marin, and S Shyam Sundar. 2012. Can You Hold My Hand? Physical Warmth in Human-Robot Interaction. ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction: 201--202. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eunil Park and Jaeryoung Lee. 2014. I am a warm robot: the effects of temperature in physical human--robot interaction. Robotica 32, 1: 133--142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Subramanian Sivaramakrishnan, Wan Fang, and Tang Zaiyong. 2007. Giving an The-human touch to e-tailing: The moderating roles of static information quantity and consumption motive in the effectiveness of an anthropomorphic information agent. Journal of Interactive Marketing.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. E. Williams and J. A. Bargh. 2008. Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth. Science 322, 5901: 606--607.Google Scholar
- Ricarda Wullenkord, Marlena R. Fraune, Friederike Eyssel, and Selma Sabanovic. 2016. Getting in Touch: How imagined, actual, and physical contact affect evaluations of robots. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2016: 980--985.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer Zamora. 2017. Rise of the Chatbots?: Finding a Place for Artificial Intelligence in India and US. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion: 109--112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ryan Schuetzer, Mark Grimes, Justin Scott Giboney, and Joseph Buckman. Facilitating Natural Conversational Agent Interactions: Lessons from a Deception Experiment. 2014. Information Systems and Quantitative Analysis Faculty Proceedings & Presentations. Paper 16.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A Hot Bot: Testing Effect of Temperature on Feelings of Closeness When Interacting With a Chatbot
Recommendations
Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots
DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceText messaging-based conversational agents (CAs), popularly called chatbots, received significant attention in the last two years. However, chatbots are still in their nascent stage: They have a low penetration rate as 84% of the Internet users have not ...
Small Talk Conversations and the Long-Term Use of Chatbots in Educational Settings – Experiences from a Field Study
Chatbot Research and DesignAbstractIn this paper, we analyze the use of small talk conversations based on a dialogue analysis of a long-term field study in which university students regularly interacted with a chatbot during a 3-month period of time in an educational setting. In ...
Emojifying chatbot interactions: An exploration of emoji utilization in human-chatbot communications
Highlights- Emojis increase chatbots' service satisfaction, mediated by warmth perception. This effect is weaker for chatbots than humans.
- The study contributes a nuanced understanding of the CASA paradigm regarding inconsistencies in social ...
AbstractThe prevalence of chatbots in human–computer communication has significantly increased. Emojis, as a form of emotional disclosure, have gained significant attention for their potential to boost chatbot service satisfaction. However, how and when ...
Comments