Diversity-focused Online Professional Development for Community College Computing Faculty: Participant Motivations and Perceptions

ABSTRACT

Although computing occupations increasingly dominate the workforce, the computing discipline does not attract sufficient and diverse students to meet societal workforce needs. LIGHTHOUSE FOR CS is a collection of professional development efforts seeking to increase computing diversity through faculty education. LIGHTHOUSE CC provides an open online course extending a decade of successful face-to-face TAPESTRY workshops. LIGHTHOUSE CC targets community college computing faculty, building off of research suggesting that online professional development can be as effective as in-person professional development. We believe it is one of the first attempts to validate that finding for community college computing faculty. The paper examines participant motivations and perceptions of online and face-to-face diversity-focused professional development for community college computing educators. To meet the needs of the community college computing faculty, we began with a needs assessment survey. Its feedback and prior face-to-face workshop experiences were integrated with several instructional design principles and theories to engage community college faculty, notably the ARCS motivational design model (Keller, 1987) and the Community of Practice model (Wenger, 1998). Project analyses involved both surveys and focus group interviews. The paper also provides directions for future improvements and suggestions for others who are considering online or diversity-focused professional development.

References

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2. Brooks, C., Stalburg, C., Dillahunt, T., & Robert, L. (2015). Learn with Friends: The Effects of Student Face-to-Face Collaborations on Massive Open Online Course Activities. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 241--244). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
3. Brophy, J. (1981). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist. 18 (3). 200--215.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32--42.
5. Buysse, V., Sparkman, K. L., & Wesley, P. W. (2003). Communities of practice: Connecting what we know with what we do. Exceptional children, 69 (3), 263--277.
6. Authors, 2016.
7. Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
8. Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (1), 8--19.
9. Fishman, B., Konstantopoulos, S., Kubitskey, B. W., Vath, R., Park, G., Johnson, H., & Edelson, D. C. (2013). Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64 (5), 426--438.
10. Huang, W., Huang, W., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2006). A preliminary validation of attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction model-based instructional material motivational survey in a computer-based tutorial setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37 (2), 243--259.
11. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10 (3), 2--10.
12. Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control.
13. Kulkarni, C. E., Bernstein, M. S., & Klemmer, S. R. (2015). PeerStudio: Rapid Peer Feedback Emphasizes Revision and Improves Performance (pp. 75--84). ACM Press.
14. Perna, L., Ruby, A., Boruch, R., Wang, N., Scull, J., Evans, C., Ahmad, S. (2013) The life cycle of a million MOOC users. University of Pennsylvania.
15. Shellnut, B. (1998). John keller: A motivating influence in the field of instructional systems design. Retrieved March 9, 2008, from http://www.arcsmodel.com/pdf/Biographical%20Information.pdf
16. Smith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2007). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education. Review of adult learning and literacy, 7(7), 205--244.
17. Song, S. H., & Keller, J. M. (1999). The ARCS model for developing motivationally-adaptive computer-assisted instruction. Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX. 19.
18. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (2), 137--158.
19. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (1), 80--91.
20. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.
21. Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (1), 8--19.
22. Chang, Y., Cintron, L., Cohoon, J., Cohoon, J., & Tychonievich, L. (2016, October). Instructional design principles of diversity-focused professional development MOOC for community college computing faculty: LIGHTHOUSE CC. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE (pp. 1--5). IEEE.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Education

    • Distance learning

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs