skip to main content
10.1145/3159450.3159538acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

A Biology-themed Introductory CS Course at a Large, Diverse Public University

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the curriculum and evaluation of a pilot Biology-themed CS1 course offering at a large public university. Inspired by Harvey Mudd's CS 5 Green, we adapt CS1 + Bio to fit the needs of our student body, which is much more typical for those US institutions that produce the bulk of the nation's CS undergraduate degrees. This course was team-taught by a computer science professor and a biology professor, and combined typical CS1 topics with relevant biology content. Our initial offering attracted students who would not otherwise have taken CS1, and was the only one of our three CS1 courses where more students reported planning to major in CS after the course than before it.

References

  1. Christine Alvarado, Zachary Dodds, and Ran Libeskind-Hadas. 2012. Increasing Women's Participation in Computing at Harvey Mudd College. Inroads, Vol. 3, 4 (2012), 55--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2011. Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action. (2011). http://visionandchange.org/finalreport/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. William Bialek and David Botstein. 2004. Introductory science and mathematics education for 21st-century biologists. Science, Vol. 303, 5659 (2004), 788--790.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jane E. Caldwell. 2007. Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips. CBE Life Sciences Education Vol. 6, 1 (March. 2007), 9--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. K. Clark, I. Karsch-Mizrachi, D. J. Lipman, J. Ostell, and E. W. Sayers. 2016. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res., Vol. 44, D1 (Jan. 2016), 67--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Catherine H. Crouch and Eric Mazur. 2001. Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results. American Journal of Physics Vol. 69, 9 (2001), 970--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Quintin Cutts, Angela Carbone, and Kelsey van Haaster. 2004. Using an Electronic Voting System to Promote Active Reflection on Coursework Feedback Proceedings of ICCE 2004. APSCE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zachary Dodds, Ran Libeskind-Hadas, and Eliot Bush. 2010. When CS 1 is Biology 1: Cross-disciplinary Collaboration as CS Context Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE). 219--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Zachary Dodds, Ran Libeskind-Hadas, and Eliot Bush. 2012. Bio1 as CS1: Evaluating a Cross-disciplinary CS Context Proceedings of the 17th Annual conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE). ACM, 268--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Harvey Mudd College. 2015. Common Data Set. Online at https://www.hmc.edu/institutional-research/institutional-statistics/common-data-set/. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sharon K Lanning, Sonya L Ranson, and Rita M Willett. 2008. Communication skills instruction utilizing interdisciplinary peer teachers: program development and student perceptions. J Dent Educ, Vol. 72, 2 (Feb. 2008), 172--182. 1145/3059009.3059029Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. University of California at San Diego, Saint Petersburg Academic University, and the Russian Academy of Sciences. {n. d.}. Rosalind, a platform for learning bioinformatics through problem solving. http://rosalind.info. ({n. d.}). http://rosalind.info/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniel Zingaro. 2010. Experience Report: Peer Instruction in Remedial Computer Science Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications(Ed-Media), Jan Herrinton and Bill Hunger (Eds.). AACE, 5030--35. Online at http://editlib.org/p/36184/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Emile Zuckerkandl, Richard T Jones, and Linus Pauling. 1960. A comparison of animal hemoglobins by tryptic peptide pattern analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 46, 10 (1960), 1349--1360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Stuart Zweben and Betsy Bizot. 2017. 2016 Taulbee Survey. Computing Research News Vol. 29, 5 (2017). http://cra.org/crn/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/05/2016-Taulbee-Survey.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Biology-themed Introductory CS Course at a Large, Diverse Public University

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2018
      1174 pages
      ISBN:9781450351034
      DOI:10.1145/3159450

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate161of459submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
      November 30 - December 1, 2024
      Virtual Event , USA
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader