skip to main content
10.1145/3159450.3159594acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Reflections of a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Working Group based on Data from a National CS Education Program

Published:21 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the US, many groups of students are underrepresented in computer science (CS) classes at the K-12 level [23,25]. Many of the activities of TEALS (Technology Education and Literacy in Schools), a national computer science education program, have the potential to impact the diversity of students enrolled in computer science classes, student performance on AP exams, and student attitudes towards CS careers. TEALS works with high schools to build and grow sustainable computer science programs through teaching partnerships between classroom teachers and volunteers who work in the tech industry. In 2016, TEALS initiated a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Working Group (DEIWG) to holistically address the overall impact of the program on increasing diversity in CS, including TEALS' approach to: selection of schools, student recruitment efforts into CS courses, recruitment and training of TEALS volunteers, curriculum design and resources, and instructional support of volunteers and teachers. The working group compared national, regional, and state-wide outcomes and demographics to those of TEALS partner schools, students, volunteers, and teachers to identify best practices and areas in need of investment. This paper describes these findings and presents strategies for future work.

References

  1. Apple inclusion and diversity. https://www.apple.com/diversity/. Accessed: 2017-11-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Code.org computer science education tracker: K-12 computer science policy and implementation in states. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J3TbEQt3SmIWuha7ooBPvlWpiK-pNVIV5uuQEzNzdkE/edit#heading=h.xllbzwex. Accessed: 2017-08-31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Diversity gaps in computer science:exploring the underrepresentation of girls, blacks and hispanics 2016. http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/diversity-gaps-in-computer-science-report.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Facebook diversity update: Positive hiring trends show progress. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/07/facebook-diversity-update-positive-hiring-trends-show-progress/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fast facts: Educational institutions. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fast facts: Title 1. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Google diversity - commitments. https://diversity.google/commitments/. Accessed: 2017-11-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Inside microsoft - our workforce. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/diversity/inside-microsoft/default.aspx#epgDivFocusArea. Accessed: 2017-11-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nces high school longitudinal study. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/hsls09/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Computer science learning: Closing the gap: Rural and small town school districts. results from the 2015-2016 google-gallup study of computer science in u.s. k-12 schools (issue brief no. 4) google inc. & gallop inc. https://goo.gl/hYxqCr, August 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruckman, A., Biggers, M., Ericson, B., McKlin, T., Dimond, J., DiSalvo, B., Hewner, M., Ni, L., and Yardi, S. Georgia computes!: Improving the computing education pipeline. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (2009), vol. 41, ACM, pp. 86--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Buckingham, D., and Sefton-Green, J. Gotta catch'em all: Structure, agency and pedagogy in children's media culture. Media, Culture & Society 25, 3 (2003), 379--399.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dennehy, T. C., and Dasgupta, N. Female peer mentors early in college increase women's positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 23 (2017), 5964--5969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. DuBow, W. M., Quinn, B. A., Townsend, G. C., Robinson, R., and Barr, V. Efforts to make computer science more inclusive of women. ACM Inroads 7, 4 (2016), 74--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Goode, J., and Margolis, J. Exploring computer science: A case study of school reform. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 11, 2 (2011), 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Granor, N., DeLyser, L. A., and Wang, K. Teals: Teacher professional development using industry volunteers. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (2016), ACM, pp. 60--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jones, C. New class leads to big gains in number of girls, minorities taking ap computer science exams. https://edsource.org/2017/new-class-leads-to-big-gains-in-number-of-girls-minorities-taking-ap-computer-science-exams/585170, July 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Klawe, M. Increasing female participation in computing: The harvey mudd college story. Computer 46, 3 (2013), 56--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ladson-Billings, G. But that's just good teaching! the case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into practice 34, 3 (1995), 159--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Margolis, J., and Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. MIT press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Papini, A., DeLyser, L. A., Granor, N., and Wang, K. Preparing and supporting industry professionals as volunteer high school computer science co-instructors. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (New York, NY, USA, 2017), SIGCSE '17, ACM, pp. 441--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rhodes, J. E., Reddy, R., Grossman, J. B., and Maxine Lee, J. Volunteer mentoring relationships with minority youth: An analysis of same- versus cross-race matches. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32, 10 (2002), 2114--2133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Jacobs, J. A., Kanny, M. A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., and Zimmerman, H. B. Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: The evolution of women's participation in computer science. The Journal of Higher Education 88, 2 (2017), 258--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Stern, J., Reid, E., and Bancroft, K. Teaching introductory computer science for a diverse student body: Girls who code style. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (2015), ACM, pp. 705--705. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wang, J., and Hejazi Moghadam, S. Diversity barriers in k-12 computer science education: Structural and social. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (2017), ACM, pp. 615--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Reflections of a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Working Group based on Data from a National CS Education Program

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2018
      1174 pages
      ISBN:9781450351034
      DOI:10.1145/3159450

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate161of459submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
      November 30 - December 1, 2024
      Virtual Event , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader